From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59C5DC54E58 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rkH99-0007eA-Gn; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:27:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rkH96-0007dy-Hc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:27:20 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-xc29.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::c29]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rkH94-0001Um-TL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 01:27:20 -0400 Received: by mail-oo1-xc29.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5a422ea50e6so95362eaf.2 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 22:27:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710307637; x=1710912437; darn=nongnu.org; h=in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=SnXKdH2/uWP57aKF2ItTto9p7NWRfTRsqVbKFZCjSmw=; b=nRLKf7e14qeBM8hBNfvrRRgL5nzykYX8I6lS76lkmgAfuCOcbqgJxN+i1TTSYtw2JA gYqEEwQipI8vuSE/5oSONwY/XAUKzAkpgp2KFFR5U9KD7M39DwxGRtSMvly527wEhsvu nCxLirnyixSeslJ7CKTh3LUjo6Do2LlFlXOaKpNzaD/TrVDfoVnAIbvYDpoKHfFrnoRu Whfzr8WTiB94fj9NZxUUtDftL1joqDZnTY20jzM8P6iUoVYNUJyg4jyV44UEM3k2z2Qv ODvbVQzfM9E8vRd5gUmDMPqTK/XUnCjVbnU9DqY2eg2kMUMS138xMiAfDqeHMkACI/Vi oLsw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710307637; x=1710912437; h=in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SnXKdH2/uWP57aKF2ItTto9p7NWRfTRsqVbKFZCjSmw=; b=dG+Q0WWnd19Re0/LbFUnoeRPQyAcmP7zM8AoAYdRujZfqxHz8uOxSgrUcwGeTs7DPf qE/tKOfF4SuU8hlILLycVoMKoiXTU3EfNBc3yA+lNeQL1ycIZwfgCNGC1UN947UO7zPL nNOXLDwWSNxAF0AzhOiU2LFa4VtqSNDBembd5ld7PBEr5PcYBAqs/arJls/6Wm0sD0B2 p+hpd+JGGsF7oKt/YwNwWUFe4wkeobvSO4CQZ3oYII9x7T35Hs9rIr/L2mNwqbeESMVC f2QnsGaURZKHqbNQXMRBtmXD3I40kPOapxW6XrpPnPATGRhUrc+ONjnlZapCidPRu1Bg B0mA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwaQJylLnJFp23l2hjx9EuUaCvu4SkBRLFmK/uy8o6ATwxZ13pN WPc9Pc7NpbMArpLCCsWX8xKYmIb5kpRRKH0Uw7MOGEco2FPSYtDy X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEuZPopXt8ctCtN+RbTklJNLwkYT4db4caHAMMHw9nnNHv1qEDoHxuEK0pQkXMSWz6SvyZibQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6358:7f17:b0:17b:f880:a3c1 with SMTP id p23-20020a0563587f1700b0017bf880a3c1mr4067520rwn.17.1710307637448; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 22:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([1.146.20.17]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g6-20020aa79f06000000b006e6baf14752sm323054pfr.58.2024.03.12.22.27.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Mar 2024 22:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:27:08 +1000 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/24] Revert "replay: stop us hanging in rr_wait_io_event" From: "Nicholas Piggin" To: =?utf-8?q?Alex_Benn=C3=A9e?= Cc: , "Pavel Dovgalyuk" , =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , "Richard Henderson" , "Paolo Bonzini" , "John Snow" , "Cleber Rosa" , "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" , "Beraldo Leal" , "Michael Tokarev" X-Mailer: aerc 0.15.2 References: <20240311174026.2177152-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <20240311174026.2177152-6-npiggin@gmail.com> <87v85ro9qt.fsf@draig.linaro.org> <87a5n3mac5.fsf@draig.linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <87a5n3mac5.fsf@draig.linaro.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::c29; envelope-from=npiggin@gmail.com; helo=mail-oo1-xc29.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Wed Mar 13, 2024 at 7:03 AM AEST, Alex Benn=C3=A9e wrote: > "Nicholas Piggin" writes: > > > On Tue Mar 12, 2024 at 11:33 PM AEST, Alex Benn=C3=A9e wrote: > >> Nicholas Piggin writes: > >> > >> > This reverts commit 1f881ea4a444ef36a8b6907b0b82be4b3af253a2. > >> > > >> > That commit causes reverse_debugging.py test failures, and does > >> > not seem to solve the root cause of the problem x86-64 still > >> > hangs in record/replay tests. > >> > >> I'm still finding the reverse debugging tests failing with this series= . > > > > :( > > > > In gitlab CI or your own testing? What are you running exactly? > > My own - my mistake I didn't get a clean build because of the format > bug. Ah, x86_64 is working for you now? Great. > However I'm seeing new failures: > > env QEMU_TEST_FLAKY_TESTS=3D1 AVOCADO_TIMEOUT_EXPECTED=3D1 ./pyvenv/bin= /avocado run ./tests/avocado/reverse_debugging.py > Fetching asset from ./tests/avocado/reverse_debugging.py:ReverseDebuggi= ng_AArch64.test_aarch64_virt > JOB ID : bd4b29f7afaa24dc6e32933ea9bc5e46bbc3a5a4 > JOB LOG : /home/alex/avocado/job-results/job-2024-03-12T20.58-bd4b29= f/job.log > (1/5) ./tests/avocado/reverse_debugging.py:ReverseDebugging_X86_64.tes= t_x86_64_pc: PASS (4.49 s) > (2/5) ./tests/avocado/reverse_debugging.py:ReverseDebugging_X86_64.tes= t_x86_64_q35: PASS (4.50 s) > (3/5) ./tests/avocado/reverse_debugging.py:ReverseDebugging_AArch64.te= st_aarch64_virt: FAIL: Invalid PC (read ffff2d941e4d7f28 instead of ffff2d9= 41e4d7f2c) (3.06 s) I added a bunch of test cases that x86 has problems with for some reason, so it skips them. Maybe aarch64 is the same. I'll take a closer look at it. > (4/5) ./tests/avocado/reverse_debugging.py:ReverseDebugging_ppc64.test= _ppc64_pseries: PASS (16.48 s) > (5/5) ./tests/avocado/reverse_debugging.py:ReverseDebugging_ppc64.test= _ppc64_powernv: FAIL: Invalid PC (read 30020210 instead of 30020214) (2.80 = s) powernv is known flaky so that's expected for now. Thanks, Nick