From: "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: "Yan Vugenfirer" <yvugenfi@redhat.com>
Cc: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Dmitry Fleytman" <dmitry.fleytman@gmail.com>,
"Akihiko Odaki" <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Sriram Yagnaraman" <sriram.yagnaraman@ericsson.com>,
"Fabiano Rosas" <farosas@suse.de>,
"Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] qtest/e1000e|igb: assert irqs are clear before triggering an irq
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 14:45:27 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D77H7J5KX2NC.1A25FAUCNO1BV@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGoVJZxkm_zj7RPBs9Lk3tpgYfzNi9UdsVOKsDibGZ98i+Ddew@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun Jan 19, 2025 at 7:22 PM AEST, Yan Vugenfirer wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 7:05 PM Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Assert there is no existing irq raised that would lead to a false
>> positive interrupt test.
>>
>> e1000e has to disable interrupt throttling for this test, because
>> it can cause delayed superfluous interrupts which trip the assertions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> tests/qtest/libqos/e1000e.h | 1 +
>> tests/qtest/e1000e-test.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> tests/qtest/igb-test.c | 6 ++++++
>> tests/qtest/libqos/e1000e.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/qtest/libqos/e1000e.h b/tests/qtest/libqos/e1000e.h
>> index 30643c80949..7154aec0339 100644
>> --- a/tests/qtest/libqos/e1000e.h
>> +++ b/tests/qtest/libqos/e1000e.h
>> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ static inline uint32_t e1000e_macreg_read(QE1000E *d,
>> uint32_t reg)
>> return qpci_io_readl(&d_pci->pci_dev, d_pci->mac_regs, reg);
>> }
>>
>> +bool e1000e_seen_isr(QE1000E *d, uint16_t msg_id);
>> void e1000e_wait_isr(QE1000E *d, uint16_t msg_id);
>> void e1000e_tx_ring_push(QE1000E *d, void *descr);
>> void e1000e_rx_ring_push(QE1000E *d, void *descr);
>> diff --git a/tests/qtest/e1000e-test.c b/tests/qtest/e1000e-test.c
>> index 746d26cfb67..9ab81ecff5b 100644
>> --- a/tests/qtest/e1000e-test.c
>> +++ b/tests/qtest/e1000e-test.c
>> @@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ static void e1000e_send_verify(QE1000E *d, int
>> *test_sockets, QGuestAllocator *a
>> E1000_TXD_DTYP_D |
>> sizeof(buffer));
>>
>> + /* Ensure the interrupt has not been taken already */
>> + g_assert(!e1000e_seen_isr(d, E1000E_TX0_MSG_ID));
>> +
>> /* Put descriptor to the ring */
>> e1000e_tx_ring_push(d, &descr);
>>
>> @@ -105,6 +108,9 @@ static void e1000e_receive_verify(QE1000E *d, int
>> *test_sockets, QGuestAllocator
>> char buffer[64];
>> int ret;
>>
>> + /* Ensure the interrupt has not been taken already */
>> + g_assert(!e1000e_seen_isr(d, E1000E_RX0_MSG_ID));
>> +
>>
> I don't think potentially crashing the guest is the right solution.
> I suggest maybe substituting with logging.
This is just for qtest where assertions are used to indicate
failure.
Thanks,
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-21 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-17 17:02 [PATCH 0/9] hw/e1000e|igb: interrupts and qtests fixes Nicholas Piggin
2025-01-17 17:02 ` [PATCH 1/9] qtest/e1000e|igb: Clear interrupt-cause and msix pending bits after irq Nicholas Piggin
2025-01-17 17:02 ` [PATCH 2/9] net/e1000e: Permit disabling interrupt throttling Nicholas Piggin
2025-01-17 17:02 ` [PATCH 3/9] qtest/e1000e|igb: assert irqs are clear before triggering an irq Nicholas Piggin
2025-01-18 8:14 ` Akihiko Odaki
2025-01-19 9:22 ` Yan Vugenfirer
2025-01-21 4:45 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2025-01-17 17:03 ` [PATCH 4/9] net/igb: Fix interrupt throttling interval calculation Nicholas Piggin
2025-01-18 8:22 ` Akihiko Odaki
2025-01-17 17:03 ` [PATCH 5/9] net/igb: Fix EITR LLI and counter fields Nicholas Piggin
2025-01-18 8:37 ` Akihiko Odaki
2025-01-17 17:03 ` [PATCH 6/9] net/e1000e|igb: Fix interrupt throttling logic Nicholas Piggin
2025-01-18 9:50 ` Akihiko Odaki
2025-01-17 17:03 ` [PATCH 7/9] qtest/e1000e|igb: Test interrupt throttling in multiple_transfers test Nicholas Piggin
2025-01-17 17:03 ` [PATCH 8/9] net/e1000e: Fix xITR minimum value Nicholas Piggin
2025-01-18 7:50 ` Akihiko Odaki
2025-01-17 17:03 ` [PATCH 9/9] hw/net/e1000e|igb: Remove xitr_guest_value logic Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D77H7J5KX2NC.1A25FAUCNO1BV@gmail.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=akihiko.odaki@daynix.com \
--cc=dmitry.fleytman@gmail.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sriram.yagnaraman@ericsson.com \
--cc=yvugenfi@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).