From: "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: "Chalapathi V" <chalapathi.v@linux.ibm.com>, <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>, <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>, <clg@kaod.org>,
<calebs@linux.ibm.com>, <chalapathi.v@ibm.com>,
<saif.abrar@linux.ibm.com>, <dantan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<milesg@linux.ibm.com>, <philmd@linaro.org>,
<alistair@alistair23.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] hw/ssi/pnv_spi: Put a limit to RDR match failures
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 11:56:54 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D82USMP2EKXB.1LFUGZQZKVFL2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250103161824.22469-5-chalapathi.v@linux.ibm.com>
On Sat Jan 4, 2025 at 2:18 AM AEST, Chalapathi V wrote:
> There is a possibility that SPI controller can get into loop due to indefinite
> RDR match failures. Hence put a limit to failures and stop the sequencer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chalapathi V <chalapathi.v@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/ssi/pnv_spi.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ssi/pnv_spi.c b/hw/ssi/pnv_spi.c
> index 41beb559c6..d605fa8b46 100644
> --- a/hw/ssi/pnv_spi.c
> +++ b/hw/ssi/pnv_spi.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #define PNV_SPI_OPCODE_LO_NIBBLE(x) (x & 0x0F)
> #define PNV_SPI_MASKED_OPCODE(x) (x & 0xF0)
> #define PNV_SPI_FIFO_SIZE 16
> +#define RDR_MATCH_FAILURE_LIMIT 16
>
> /*
> * Macro from include/hw/ppc/fdt.h
> @@ -838,21 +839,31 @@ static void operation_sequencer(PnvSpi *s)
> */
> if (GETFIELD(SPI_STS_RDR_FULL, s->status) == 1) {
> bool rdr_matched = false;
> + static int fail_count;
This will be shared by SPI instances, is that okay or should it be
in PnvSpi?
Other than that, looks good.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-27 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-03 16:18 [PATCH v5 0/4] hw/ssi/pnv_spi: Remove PnvXferBuffer and fix CID 1558827 Chalapathi V
2025-01-03 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] hw/ssi/pnv_spi: Replace PnvXferBuffer with Fifo8 structure Chalapathi V
2025-02-27 1:39 ` Nicholas Piggin
2025-02-28 2:59 ` Chalapathi V
2025-01-03 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] hw/ssi/pnv_spi: Coverity CID 1558827: Use local var seq_index instead of get_seq_index() Chalapathi V
2025-02-27 1:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2025-02-27 1:44 ` Nicholas Piggin
2025-01-03 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] hw/ssi/pnv_spi: Make bus names distinct for each controllers of a socket Chalapathi V
2025-02-27 1:54 ` Nicholas Piggin
2025-02-28 3:03 ` Chalapathi V
2025-02-28 7:45 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-02-28 11:00 ` Chalapathi V
2025-02-28 16:15 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-01-03 16:18 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] hw/ssi/pnv_spi: Put a limit to RDR match failures Chalapathi V
2025-02-27 1:56 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2025-02-28 3:04 ` Chalapathi V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D82USMP2EKXB.1LFUGZQZKVFL2@gmail.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=alistair@alistair23.me \
--cc=calebs@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chalapathi.v@ibm.com \
--cc=chalapathi.v@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=dantan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=fbarrat@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=milesg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=saif.abrar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).