* [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-ppc speed
@ 2004-07-03 21:08 Brad Watson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brad Watson @ 2004-07-03 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Hi All,
I've been experimenting w/running linux under
qemu-system-ppc. My impression is that is
considerably slower than linux running under qemu. Is
it due to primarily endian conversion overhead or
something else ?
Regards,
Brad Watson
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-ppc speed
@ 2004-07-03 21:14 Natalia Portillo
2004-07-04 10:30 ` J. Mayer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Natalia Portillo @ 2004-07-03 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
It is due to emulation overhead, and the PowerPC CPU (specially the MMU)
complexity.
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: qemu-devel-bounces+iosglpgc=teleline.es@nongnu.org
> [mailto:qemu-devel-bounces+iosglpgc=teleline.es@nongnu.org]
> En nombre de Brad Watson
> Enviado el: sábado, 03 de julio de 2004 22:09
> Para: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Asunto: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-ppc speed
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've been experimenting w/running linux under
> qemu-system-ppc. My impression is that is considerably
> slower than linux running under qemu. Is it due to primarily
> endian conversion overhead or something else ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Brad Watson
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-ppc speed
2004-07-03 21:14 [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-ppc speed Natalia Portillo
@ 2004-07-04 10:30 ` J. Mayer
2004-07-04 15:09 ` Brad Watson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: J. Mayer @ 2004-07-04 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
On Sat, 2004-07-03 at 23:14, Natalia Portillo wrote:
> It is due to emulation overhead, and the PowerPC CPU (specially the MMU)
> complexity.
In my opinion, PPC is far less complicated than x86....
I ran nbench under qemu-system-ppc some time ago. It gave me the
emulated system was 15 times slower than the host machine. It seems to
be quite acceptable to me.
> > En nombre de Brad Watson
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've been experimenting w/running linux under
> > qemu-system-ppc. My impression is that is considerably
> > slower than linux running under qemu. Is it due to primarily
> > endian conversion overhead or something else ?
Did you compare with i386-softmmu ?
--
J. Mayer <l_indien@magic.fr>
Never organized
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-ppc speed
2004-07-04 10:30 ` J. Mayer
@ 2004-07-04 15:09 ` Brad Watson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brad Watson @ 2004-07-04 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Hi J,
I was comparing the ppc-softmmu w/ the i86-softmmu.
I've since noticed the following messages in dmesg on
the ppc Linux instance, and I suspect that my
impression that it was more "sluggishness" is likely
related to the following messages:
hdc: DSC timeout
hdc: DSC timeout
.
.
.
etc.
hdc was assigned to an iso file via the -cdrom
parameter when qemu-system-ppc was started.
Regards,
Brad Watson
--- "J. Mayer" <l_indien@magic.fr> wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-07-03 at 23:14, Natalia Portillo wrote:
>
> > It is due to emulation overhead, and the PowerPC
> CPU (specially the MMU)
> > complexity.
>
> In my opinion, PPC is far less complicated than
> x86....
> I ran nbench under qemu-system-ppc some time ago. It
> gave me the
> emulated system was 15 times slower than the host
> machine. It seems to
> be quite acceptable to me.
>
> > > En nombre de Brad Watson
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I've been experimenting w/running linux under
> > > qemu-system-ppc. My impression is that is
> considerably
> > > slower than linux running under qemu. Is it due
> to primarily
> > > endian conversion overhead or something else ?
>
> Did you compare with i386-softmmu ?
>
>
> --
>
> J. Mayer <l_indien@magic.fr>
>
> Never organized
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-07-04 15:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-07-03 21:14 [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-ppc speed Natalia Portillo
2004-07-04 10:30 ` J. Mayer
2004-07-04 15:09 ` Brad Watson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-03 21:08 Brad Watson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).