From: "Natalia Portillo" <claunia@claunia.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [Qemu-devel] Inquiry, speed comparison on OS X, QEMU vs Virtual PC
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 21:07:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1Bj1gZ-0002G6-GF@lists.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7431CE2A-D1DF-11D8-A23B-000A2796D230@free.fr>
I think that including support for the PowerPC swapping instructions in QEMU
will break compatibility with host PowerPCs before G3, so that instructions
should be used in a run-time capability detection scheme.
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: qemu-devel-bounces+iosglpgc=teleline.es@nongnu.org
> [mailto:qemu-devel-bounces+iosglpgc=teleline.es@nongnu.org]
> En nombre de Pierre d'Herbemont
> Enviado el: viernes, 09 de julio de 2004 20:38
> Para: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Asunto: Re: [Qemu-devel] Inquiry, speed comparison on OS X,
> QEMU vs Virtual PC
>
> I probably should add that the Mac OS X version that is
> avalaible for download doesn't include support for the
> PowerPC swapping instructions (little-endian storing and
> loading instructions). Next release will.
>
> Pierre
>
> Le 6 juil. 04, à 02:29, dguinan@mac.com a écrit :
>
> > It was precisely because it has not yet been optimized that I was
> > curious of first impressions. The fact that it has been
> described as
> > "somewhat" slower is encouraging. No one expects it to be
> faster than
> > VPC out the gate, but to be in the same ballpark is quite an
> > achievement.
> >
> > -Daniel
> >
> >
> > On Jul 5, 2004, at 5:23 PM, Leigh Dyer wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 15:24 -0700, Daniel J.Guinan wrote:
> >>> I'm curious, how does the speed compare to Virtual PC?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Not terribly well yet - on my 1Ghz Tibook, it feels about the same
> >> speed as on my 800Mhz PIII desktop PC at work, which is to
> say that
> >> the emulated system seems somewhere around
> >> high-end-468/low-end-Pentium speed. However, it's important to
> >> remember that Virtual PC:
> >>
> >> * has been around for ages, and has seen lots of development and
> >> optimisation
> >> * uses a hand-written and heavily optimised x86->PPC translator
> >> * uses special PPC features like Altivec and little-endian mode to
> >> speed things up
> >> * uses the host system's MMU to accelerate memory access
> >>
> >> Qemu's still fast enough to be usable for a great many
> things though,
> >> so if you're debating whether or not to try it, by all
> means download
> >> it and give it a go.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Leigh
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Qemu-devel mailing list
> >> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> >> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qemu-devel mailing list
> > Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-09 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-02 22:56 [Qemu-devel] [Patch] Mac OS X Port Pierre d'Herbemont
2004-07-03 13:34 ` Jean-Michel POURE
2004-07-04 7:21 ` [Qemu-devel] " Christian Walther
2004-07-04 10:08 ` Pierre d'Herbemont
2004-07-04 10:37 ` Leigh Dyer
2004-07-05 1:22 ` [Qemu-devel] " Leigh Dyer
2004-07-05 22:24 ` [Qemu-devel] Inquiry, speed comparison on OS X, QEMU vs Virtual PC Daniel J. Guinan
2004-07-06 0:23 ` Leigh Dyer
2004-07-06 0:29 ` dguinan
2004-07-09 19:37 ` Pierre d'Herbemont
2004-07-09 20:07 ` Natalia Portillo [this message]
2004-07-09 20:14 ` Chad Page
2004-07-10 12:47 ` Pierre d'Herbemont
2004-07-10 13:08 ` J. Mayer
2004-07-10 13:23 ` Pierre d'Herbemont
2004-07-10 14:05 ` J. Mayer
2004-08-12 10:56 ` David Woodhouse
2004-08-12 12:51 ` Pierre d'Herbemont
2004-07-10 13:14 ` Fabrice Bellard
2004-07-10 13:27 ` Pierre d'Herbemont
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1Bj1gZ-0002G6-GF@lists.gnu.org \
--to=claunia@claunia.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).