qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Natalia Portillo" <claunia@claunia.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [Qemu-devel] BIOS behaves different as real BIOS
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 09:20:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1BlkSU-0005xU-Ly@lists.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1090048364.21480.6.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com>

Well the PC-DOS 1.0 does not have that signature, and also does not create
it in any disk you format. Nor the SCO Xenix has it.

I know this signature is present on DOS 3.0 and upper versions in all disks
you create. I not know about DOS 2.0 (I lost my copy of this version).

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: qemu-devel-bounces+iosglpgc=teleline.es@nongnu.org
> [mailto:qemu-devel-bounces+iosglpgc=teleline.es@nongnu.org]
> En nombre de Antony T Curtis
> Enviado el: sábado, 17 de julio de 2004 8:13
> Para: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Asunto: Re: [Qemu-devel] BIOS behaves different as real BIOS
> 
> On Sat, 2004-07-17 at 07:01, Natalia Portillo wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > I tried to boot an old operating system from qemu and I get
> a message
> > from BIOS saying that tbe floppy is not bootable
> (literally: "FATAL: 
> > Not a bootable disk").
> > 
> > I think that this is because the BIOS searches for the 0x55AA 
> > signature on last two bytes of first sector of disk.
> > As far as I remember, this signature was introduced very
> lately and as
> > far as I tested on my real systems, this signature is not really 
> > searched at boot time, and every DOS before 3.0 doesn't
> have it (it is
> > used also by later DOSes and Windows to identify a FAT
> filesystem), at
> > least on floppies (I think that on hard disks it is also
> ignored, but
> > never tested -0x55AA is also used to identify Intel
> partition scheme, aka MBR-).
> 
> I remember looking at the IBM PC/XT BIOS source and seeing it, and 
> when I used to play with putting my own messages in the boot sector, 
> It had to be there. This was around 15 years ago. The old IBM PC/XT 
> would boot into ROM Cassette BASIC if it did not find the signature. 
> It is possible that the original IBM PC did not have the check but by 
> the time the PC/XT came out, it did. The model of the PC/XT I had was 
> 5150 (the 2 full height floppy drive model)
> 
> <snip>
> 
> --
> Antony T Curtis <antony.t.curtis@ntlworld.com>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel

      reply	other threads:[~2004-07-17  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-17  6:01 [Qemu-devel] BIOS behaves different as real BIOS Natalia Portillo
2004-07-17  6:40 ` [Qemu-devel] " Ben Pfaff
2004-07-17  6:45   ` Natalia Portillo
2004-07-17  6:51     ` Ben Pfaff
2004-07-17  7:04       ` Natalia Portillo
2004-07-17 15:47         ` Ben Pfaff
2004-07-17  7:12 ` [Qemu-devel] " Antony T Curtis
2004-07-17  8:20   ` Natalia Portillo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1BlkSU-0005xU-Ly@lists.gnu.org \
    --to=claunia@claunia.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).