From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CmosL-0007db-B0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 02:49:37 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CmosK-0007dP-Ub for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 02:49:37 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CmosK-0007dM-S8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 02:49:36 -0500 Received: from [213.228.0.62] (helo=postfix4-1.free.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CmogY-00037l-Vd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 02:37:27 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: References: <0607B33A-5E93-11D9-9B65-000A9585A104@cordney.com> <20050106223507.GG23549@cs.unibo.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Laurent Amon Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:37:26 +0100 Subject: [Qemu-devel] softmmu ppc Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Magnus Damm , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 6 janv. 05, at 23:52, Magnus Damm wrote: > Speaking of linuxppc... > Have you tried the improved softmmu patches on a ppc host? > I don't know about linuxppc, but on osx 1.3.7, as reported by Daniel Egger on Jan 2nd, it bombs out. Lga.