From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EtoM9-0004D4-UN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 10:45:50 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EtoM7-0004CS-QV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 10:45:49 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EtoM7-0004CM-LG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 10:45:47 -0500
Received: from [217.10.32.19] (helo=comtv.ru)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EtoNM-0002zb-Nc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 10:47:04 -0500
Received: from av1474.oops ([10.0.66.9] verified)
	by comtv.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8)
	with ESMTP id 118889461 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org;
	Tue, 03 Jan 2006 18:44:03 +0300
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:44:32 +0300 (MSK)
From: malc <malc@pulsesoft.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] OpenStep / Busmouse - correct patch
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0601031447430.9796@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0601031844010.1532@home.oyster.ru>
References: <61142.80.226.246.226.1136140727.squirrel@www.mathematik.uni-marburg.de>
	<Pine.LNX.4.63.0601012333280.32534@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
	<53441.80.226.220.222.1136289496.squirrel@www.mathematik.uni-marburg.de>
	<Pine.LNX.4.63.0601031447430.9796@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, engel@mathematik.uni-marburg.de wrote:
>
>> The most difficult problem was actually finding documentation on the
>> busmouse controller ;-).
>
> That always seems to be the biggest problem...
>
>>> How about this on top (unfortunately untested, since I do not
>>> have a system handy which supports a busmouse):
>>
>> Hmm, there seems to be a problem with your patch, though I haven't quite
>> figured out what exactly the cause is. When using the -busmouse option,
>> the busmouse_init function is called and seems to register the callbacks
>> for the provided I/O address ranges successfully (return value is 0 from
>> register_ioport_{read,write}) - but the actual callback routines are
>> never being executed, which results in OpenStep not recognizing the
>> busmouse.
>
> I'll investigate.
>

FWIW. IRQ 5 is already taken by sb16.

-- 
mailto:malc@pulsesoft.com