From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0j2v-0008Hj-N8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:35:05 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0j2u-0008Gk-1K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:35:05 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0j2t-0008Gd-Sw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:35:03 -0500 Received: from [217.10.32.17] (helo=comtv.ru) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H0j2t-0002v5-HL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:35:03 -0500 Received: from av1474.oops ([10.0.66.9] verified) by comtv.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 14891032 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:35:01 +0300 Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:35:05 +0300 (MSK) From: malc Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Some patches for QEMU In-Reply-To: <200612301124.36125.info@vruppert.de> Message-ID: References: <200612301124.36125.info@vruppert.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Qemu Devel On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Volker Ruppert wrote: > Hi all, > > I have created a set of patches for QEMU. Here is the list of changes: > [..snip..] > * standard and Cirrus VGA: implemented vertical retrace timing instead of just > toggling the register bits. The retrace patch is wrong it does not do what hardware does. Was this done to please some particular application? If yes, does it not work with correct(at least i hope so) retrace implementation? http://www.boblycat.org/~malc/code/patches/qemu/5c_rqemu.patch.gz -- vale