From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HThe8-00025f-Ic for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:57:16 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HThe6-000255-Rm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:57:16 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HThe6-00024z-NN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:57:14 -0500 Received: from grayson.netsweng.com ([207.235.77.11]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HThcW-00042q-4d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:55:36 -0400 Received: from amavis by grayson.netsweng.com with scanned-ok (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1HThcA-0000Ji-00 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:55:14 -0400 Received: from grayson.netsweng.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (grayson.netsweng.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZxMLVNmVkHOG for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:54:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from h211.241.141.67.ip.alltel.net ([67.141.241.211] helo=trantor.stuart.netsweng.com) by grayson.netsweng.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1HThbL-0000G1-00 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:54:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:54:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Stuart Anderson Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fcntl64 fix In-Reply-To: <20070320135910.GA18571@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <20070309215335.GB5629@localhost.localdomain> <20070319171303.GE28895@networkno.de> <20070320114315.GA26019@localhost.localdomain> <20070320135910.GA18571@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: >> Kiril, >> What 32 bit host and 64 bit host are you using? I'm working on >> arm on x86_64, and I'm starting to think that perhaps all of the different >> parts of the fix are needed to ensure it works correctly on all target/host >> combinations. >> > > I'm using arm(little-endian) on x86_64. That blows that theory 8-). What are you using as a test app? I think that remapping the constants is needed, but I'm just curious how we seem to be coming up with different parts of the fix when we have the same target/host combination. Stuart Stuart R. Anderson anderson@netsweng.com Network & Software Engineering http://www.netsweng.com/ 1024D/37A79149: 0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149