From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HTkwY-0006cr-Bg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:28:30 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HTkwV-0006ao-RX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:28:29 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HTkwV-0006ab-NV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:28:27 -0500
Received: from grayson.netsweng.com ([207.235.77.11])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anderson@netsweng.com>) id 1HTkuu-0006Xo-0N
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:26:48 -0400
Received: from amavis by grayson.netsweng.com with scanned-ok (Exim 3.36 #1
	(Debian)) id 1HTkut-0005qX-00
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:26:47 -0400
Received: from grayson.netsweng.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (grayson.netsweng.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id sYFzNLO-sbmQ for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>;
	Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:26:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from h211.241.141.67.ip.alltel.net ([67.141.241.211]
	helo=trantor.stuart.netsweng.com)
	by grayson.netsweng.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1HTkuZ-0005qI-00
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:26:27 -0400
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:26:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Stuart Anderson <anderson@netsweng.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fcntl64 fix
In-Reply-To: <20070320193442.GA11933@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703201625070.12505@trantor.stuart.netsweng.com>
References: <20070309215335.GB5629@localhost.localdomain>
	<20070319171303.GE28895@networkno.de>
	<20070320114315.GA26019@localhost.localdomain>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0703200954000.12505@trantor.stuart.netsweng.com>
	<20070320135910.GA18571@localhost.localdomain>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0703201252460.12505@trantor.stuart.netsweng.com>
	<20070320171103.GA20530@localhost.localdomain>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0703201358190.12505@trantor.stuart.netsweng.com>
	<20070320193442.GA11933@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:

> No. Remap is needed:
>
> $ uname -m; echo -e '#include <fcntl.h>\nF_GETLK64' | cpp | tail -1
> x86_64
> 5
>
> $ uname -m; echo -e '#include <fcntl.h>\nF_GETLK64' | cpp | tail -1
> armv5l
> 12
>
> Same for F_SETLK64 and F_SETLKW64.

You are right. I had previously printed out the non-64 versions, and
they are the same, but we not using those.

TARGET_F_GETLK 5
F_GETLK 5
TARGET_F_GETLK64 12
F_GETLK64 5

My confusion...



                                 Stuart

Stuart R. Anderson                               anderson@netsweng.com
Network & Software Engineering                   http://www.netsweng.com/
1024D/37A79149:                                  0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F
                                                  BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149