From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HuCg1-0004qd-JA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:20:45 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HuCfz-0004qR-WE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:20:44 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HuCfz-0004qK-SU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:20:43 -0400 Received: from grayson.netsweng.com ([207.235.77.11]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HuCfz-0001nw-JQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:20:43 -0400 Received: from amavis by grayson.netsweng.com with scanned-ok (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1HuCfZ-0001YW-00 for ; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:20:17 -0400 Received: from grayson.netsweng.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (grayson.netsweng.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j5lj2PQ+TXS8 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 15:20:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [71.31.89.73] (helo=trantor.stuart.netsweng.com) by grayson.netsweng.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1HuCeo-0001Xt-00 for ; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:19:30 -0400 Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 15:19:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Stuart Anderson Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user semaphore structure mapping In-Reply-To: <20070601115922.GI28232@networkno.de> Message-ID: References: <20070601115922.GI28232@networkno.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Stuart Anderson wrote: >> >> This is a refresh (vs 5/28 cvs) of a patch sent several weeks ago. This >> patch implments the structure handling for the semaphore IPC related >> structures used by semctl(). >> >> This was tested using LTP on an ARM target. >> >> Were there any objections to this patch? > > It produces too many compiler warnings to be comfortable with, and > breaks compilation of alpha-linux-user. I think alpha was actually added after I first created this patch, and I haven't been building it as it's not one of the archs I normally use. Note to self to do a build w/ everything turned on more often. The fix for it is to remove the same stuff as is done for a couple of the other archs. I'll clean it up, and take another look at the warning for this and the message queue patch, and resubmit. Stuart Stuart R. Anderson anderson@netsweng.com Network & Software Engineering http://www.netsweng.com/ 1024D/37A79149: 0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149