From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HuEgh-0006Dl-Mz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:29:35 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HuEgf-0006DZ-9g
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:29:34 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HuEgf-0006DW-43
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:29:33 -0400
Received: from grayson.netsweng.com ([207.235.77.11])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anderson@netsweng.com>) id 1HuEge-0000Gm-QT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:29:32 -0400
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 17:28:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: Stuart Anderson <anderson@netsweng.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] message queue IPC structures
In-Reply-To: <20070601120057.GJ28232@networkno.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706011711390.10904@trantor.stuart.netsweng.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705292236210.6270@trantor.stuart.netsweng.com>
	<20070601120057.GJ28232@networkno.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Thiemo Seufer wrote:

> Stuart Anderson wrote:
>>
>> This is a refresh (vs 05/28 cvs) of a patch sent several weeks ago. This
>> patch implements the structure handling for the structures used by the
>> Message queue IPC interfaces msgctl(), msgrcv() and msgsnd().
>>
>> This was tested using LTP on an ARM target.
>
> Breaks building i386-linux-user.

I forgot to mention that this patch should be applied on top of the 
semaphore patch that was sent at the same time. It seems to be building
OK for me when stacked as intended.


                                 Stuart

Stuart R. Anderson                               anderson@netsweng.com
Network & Software Engineering                   http://www.netsweng.com/
1024D/37A79149:                                  0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F
                                                  BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149