From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I53qq-0004BS-FJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 14:08:48 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I53qo-00047q-Do
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 14:08:47 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I53qo-00047W-92
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 14:08:46 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>) id 1I53qn-00019u-H7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 14:08:45 -0400
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:08:37 +0100 (BST)
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Porting QEMU to PalmOS
In-Reply-To: <200707011220.45306.luke@dashjr.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707011907270.4438@racer.site>
References: <748971.45217.qm@web54607.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
	<fb249edb0707010529n759dd181s47270bd1770f5d44@mail.gmail.com>
	<200707011220.45306.luke@dashjr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi,

On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, Luke-Jr wrote:

> On Sunday 01 July 2007 07:29, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> > On 5/24/07, sinisa marovic <sinisamarovic@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > [...] When I ported dosbox (which is written in c++)
> >
> > (Happily violating the GPL)
> >
> > Will the qemu port also be binary only?
> 
> What did he say that violates the GPL?

I think he was talking about dosbox. And expressing an implicit interest 
that whatever will be ported from qemu be handled differently.

Ciao,
Dscho