From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IQNdD-0002tP-E2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:30:51 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IQNdB-0002rr-NI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:30:50 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IQNdB-0002rQ-7s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:30:49 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IQNdA-0001i8-JN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:30:48 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:30:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Matz Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] make qemu work with GCC 4 In-Reply-To: <49F27907-6C55-40D8-A6FF-7769156F8E74@web.de> Message-ID: References: <8AEA1D4C-F488-43F2-B350-D62C3C4C1FD9@web.de> <49F27907-6C55-40D8-A6FF-7769156F8E74@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="168427776-744563551-1188394245=:23011" Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --168427776-744563551-1188394245=:23011 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: > > >What do you mean with 0.9.0-cvs? The 0.9.0 GCC4 patches for OSX/Inte= l > > > >Do you mean my patches? >=20 > No. Are yours already OSX-compatible? No OSX, no idea :) > I referred to previous patches, specifically those currently applied fo= r=20 > Q: http://www.kju-app.org/proj/browser/trunk/patches There were also=20 > some in the QEMU forums. Those only apply to the 0.9.0 tag. I see. We seem to use some of these patches (perhaps in a modified form)= =20 in our qemu package too. Sorry that I'm so unsure about the qemu topics,= =20 I'm only a compiler developer hitting qemu hard enough until it works wit= h=20 gcc4 :-) > So I was wondering whether 0.9.0-cvs from date meant 0.9.0 tag or HEAD=20 > as of date. It was supposed to mean some CVS checkout from after 0.9.0 release, where= =20 I myself couldn't really make out at which date the checkout was done=20 (because it wasn't done by me, and I didn't feel like digging too long, a= s=20 the patch obviously still applied mostly). > Sorry if this is obvious but I'm used to Subversion. In your patch I=20 > first read qemu-0.9.0, which confused me as I don't consider CVS HEAD t= o=20 > be 0.9.0. Will try your updated patch later. That btw. is against CVS HEAD (as of today). I have no idea what's=20 necessary for OSX, it might be that you need additional patches, or not,=20 can't help with that. Ciao, Michael. --168427776-744563551-1188394245=:23011--