From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IQQoy-0006qR-2F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:55:12 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IQQow-0006lK-9C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:55:11 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IQQow-0006l8-09 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:55:10 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IQQov-0000lA-E7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:55:09 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:55:05 +0100 (BST) From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] make qemu work with GCC 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <8AEA1D4C-F488-43F2-B350-D62C3C4C1FD9@web.de> <49F27907-6C55-40D8-A6FF-7769156F8E74@web.de> <46D57BB5.5000302@softhome.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Matz Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Michael Matz wrote: > On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > Thanks for your effor Michael! Now, I only hope, one of the patches > > > that makes qemu gcc4 compliant are soon merged. > > > > Well, to throw a spanner in the works: this patch is the 4th patch along > > the lines that I came about. None of them (AFAICT) was tested well > > enough to be included in CVS. Indeed, the biggest problem seems to be > > to make a patch that not only works on the machine of the poster, but on > > other machines, too. > > Please? qemu with that patch builds on four architectures, and tests > fine on two of them (including cross targets) and only because I haven't > run it on the other two architectures yet. Hey, I am not criticising you! Instead, I am thankful enough that I went so far as to expose it with git. > It might or might not need more patches than just mine (as I started > from our package), but in that case they are independend of making qemu > work with gcc 4, which is the only thing my patch is concerned about. I already reported the non-compiling state of sparc-linux-user... Any idea what I could do about it? Ciao, Dscho