From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IQQb2-0001Xw-TM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:40:48 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IQQb0-0001WB-Ph
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:40:48 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IQQb0-0001Vv-DU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:40:46 -0400
Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2] helo=mx1.suse.de)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <matz@suse.de>) id 1IQQaz-0005bP-Tu
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:40:46 -0400
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:40:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] make qemu work with GCC 4
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708291508190.28586@racer.site>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708291834260.23011@wotan.suse.de>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708282124590.23011@wotan.suse.de>
	<8AEA1D4C-F488-43F2-B350-D62C3C4C1FD9@web.de>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0708291220010.23011@wotan.suse.de>
	<49F27907-6C55-40D8-A6FF-7769156F8E74@web.de>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0708291524560.23011@wotan.suse.de>
	<46D57BB5.5000302@softhome.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0708291508190.28586@racer.site>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi,

On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> > Thanks for your effor Michael! Now, I only hope, one of the patches 
> > that makes qemu gcc4 compliant are soon merged.
> 
> Well, to throw a spanner in the works: this patch is the 4th patch along 
> the lines that I came about.  None of them (AFAICT) was tested well 
> enough to be included in CVS.  Indeed, the biggest problem seems to be 
> to make a patch that not only works on the machine of the poster, but on 
> other machines, too.

Please?  qemu with that patch builds on four architectures, and tests fine 
on two of them (including cross targets) and only because I haven't run it 
on the other two architectures yet.  It might or might not need more 
patches than just mine (as I started from our package), but in that case 
they are independend of making qemu work with gcc 4, which is the only 
thing my patch is concerned about.


Ciao,
Michael.