From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IZX00-0007q4-7w
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:20:12 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IZWzy-0007oc-Fq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:20:11 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IZWzy-0007oK-5W
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:20:10 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>) id 1IZWzx-0004hR-Lr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:20:10 -0400
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 20:18:38 +0100 (BST)
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <46F68C56.8000408@tele2.it>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709232017280.28395@racer.site>
References: <219e947f0709221443l494e4c46w6efafce989dbb867@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0709222342190.28395@racer.site>
	<fd54o8$kjc$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0709231223040.28395@racer.site>
	<46F68C56.8000408@tele2.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] vvfat mbr fixes
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Lorenzo Campedelli <lorenzo.campedelli@tele2.it>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi,

On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Lorenzo Campedelli wrote:

> I was concerned by having this handling outside of a proper place (i.e. 
> block-vvfat.c), but if we want to leave it there, wouldn't it be better 
> to just handle cases which would otherwise fail, and just try to fix the 
> "fat:" format?

I don't like that option, since it special-cases vvfat to much.

Ciao,
Dscho