From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IcoNW-0005VQ-2K
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:30:02 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IcoNU-0005Qr-6k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:30:01 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IcoNT-0005QX-QQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:29:59 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>) id 1IcoNT-0001LI-Bx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:29:59 -0400
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 21:28:43 +0100 (BST)
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: merge GGI support? [was: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] CRIS target port]
In-Reply-To: <470291D3.8020805@codemonkey.ws>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710022128160.28395@racer.site>
References: <20071002105745.GB4845@edgar.underground.se.axis.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0710021258510.28395@racer.site>
	<20071002164226.GB13534@aon.at> <470291D3.8020805@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi,

On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, Anthony Liguori wrote:

> What does one gain with GGI support?  I've never seen a good answer to 
> this.

GGI has backends that SDL does not have.

Hth,
Dscho