From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Izg5j-0007zu-Cq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:18:11 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Izg5h-0007x3-7n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:18:10 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Izg5g-0007wO-Ma for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:18:08 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Izg5g-0006xM-7t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:18:08 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 22:17:12 +0000 (GMT) From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: gcc In-Reply-To: <87zlwqw3bu.fsf@brigitte.dna.fi> Message-ID: References: <200712032020.29182.rickv@hobi.com> <87zlwqw3bu.fsf@brigitte.dna.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Antti P Miettinen Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Antti P Miettinen wrote: > Rick Vernam writes: > > any comments on the current status of moving beyond dependency on GCC > > 3.3.6? > > Sorry for a vague ignorant question, but would the gcc-4 issues be > affected in any way if the ops were inside a big function (use labels to > find them) vs the current use of separate functions? It might be a bit outdated, but the basic ideas still hold valid in http://libvncserver.sourceforge.net/qemu/qemu-porting.html. So no, you cannot have the ops inside a big function. Hth, Dscho