From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOGVi-0000VH-4X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:34:54 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KOGVg-0000T5-7Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:34:53 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59219 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KOGVg-0000Sq-3X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:34:52 -0400 Received: from fe01x03-cgp.akado.ru ([77.232.31.164]:58213 helo=akado.ru) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KOGVf-00080S-Qs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:34:52 -0400 Received: from av1474.oops ([10.0.66.9] verified) by fe01-cgp.akado.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTPS id 22083933 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:34:41 +0400 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:34:47 +0400 (MSD) From: malc Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] targets that still use dyngen In-Reply-To: <761ea48b0807291334v23d4e7f2l915c1c06aa291c@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <761ea48b0807291334v23d4e7f2l915c1c06aa291c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Laurent Desnogues wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:11 PM, malc wrote: >> It is harder, also much more tedious and requiring intimate knowlege of >> underlying architecture. > > I would have thought that Alpha is of similar complexity as MIPS, > that is less than SPARC, x86 or ARM. Or did you mean that > writing a front-end is harder than a TCG target? Yes the latter. -- mailto:av1474@comtv.ru