From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ls8Bf-0005yl-U1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:17:55 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ls8Be-0005y8-3w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:17:55 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45903 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ls8Bd-0005y4-Vm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:17:54 -0400 Received: from fe01x03-cgp.akado.ru ([77.232.31.164]:61991 helo=akado.ru) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ls8Bd-0007Vi-He for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:17:53 -0400 Received: from [10.0.66.9] ([10.0.66.9] verified) by fe01-cgp.akado.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 69796049 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 08:17:48 +0400 Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 08:17:52 +0400 (MSD) From: malc Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Next stable release In-Reply-To: <22982404.post@talk.nabble.com> Message-ID: References: <49D908C7.9040104@us.ibm.com> <22908437.post@talk.nabble.com> <22982211.post@talk.nabble.com> <22982404.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, TeLeMan wrote: > > In fact its still overflow gen_opc_buf. > Ah, i thought you were concerned with efficiency of ro[lr], my bad. And you are right - the number must be bumped, "safe guess" about MAX_OP_PER_INSTR isn't so safe after all. -- mailto:av1474@comtv.ru