From: malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Questions on audio_atexit(), possibly bugs
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 16:55:30 +0400 (MSD) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0910031654100.2433@linmac.oyster.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87iqewhcbn.fsf@pike.pond.sub.org>
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> malc <av1474@comtv.ru> writes:
>
> > On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >
> >> malc <av1474@comtv.ru> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> >> Thanks. Next question: I'm having difficulties understanding how
> >> >> HWVoiceIn / HWVoiceOut member enabled works.
> >> >>
> >> >> AUD_set_active_out(), AUD_set_active_in() and audio_run_out() take care
> >> >> to maintain hw->enabled reflecting the state of the voice. They also
> >> >> use it to avoid changing the state uselessly.
> >> >>
> >> >> audio_vm_change_state_handler() uses hw->enabled the same way. But it
> >> >> doesn't update it. Why? Same for audio_atexit().
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Because it's more or less a hack, just to make sure host doesn't loop
> >> > the sample it has. Cleaner approach would be to have a member named
> >> > something like tmporarily_disabled or paused, but that's an overkill.
> >>
> >> I think I understand why we disable voices on stop. My question is why
> >> we don't record the fact in hw->enabled. Care to explain?
> >
> > Because of overloaded meaning, here we are only pausing, what enabled
> > means in other contexts is that all the soft voices are gone or inactive,
> > so the host should stop.
> >
> >> > After some thinking i believe not calling VOICE_DISABLE in atexit is
> >> > possible given that s->vm_running is zero.
> >>
> >> Is it? We call exit() in many, many places...
> >
> > Yes. The logic goes like this, vm_stop can be zero only if we saw
> > vm_change_state_handler going from running to stopped and consequently all
> > the voices were already stopped/paused - no need to do it at exit.
>
> I fear I don't understand. vm_stop is a function, and as such can't "be
> zero".
My bad, i meant AudioState's vm_running field.
>
> Consider monitor command "quit". All it does is exit(0). I don't see
> it stopping the VM.
Yes, vm_running would still be 1 (audio's vm_change_state_handler didn't
run, so we will proceed with disabling).
--
mailto:av1474@comtv.ru
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-03 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-30 21:39 [Qemu-devel] Questions on audio_atexit(), possibly bugs Markus Armbruster
2009-09-30 22:42 ` malc
2009-09-30 22:59 ` Markus Armbruster
2009-09-30 23:22 ` malc
2009-10-02 17:04 ` Markus Armbruster
2009-10-02 21:26 ` malc
2009-10-03 11:47 ` Markus Armbruster
2009-10-03 12:21 ` malc
2009-10-03 12:49 ` Markus Armbruster
2009-10-03 12:55 ` malc [this message]
2009-09-30 23:28 ` malc
2009-10-01 15:21 ` Markus Armbruster
2009-10-01 21:26 ` malc
2009-10-01 22:40 ` Markus Armbruster
2009-10-01 22:49 ` malc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0910031654100.2433@linmac.oyster.ru \
--to=av1474@comtv.ru \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).