From: Roman Bolshakov <r.bolshakov@yadro.com>
To: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Cc: "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
libvir-list@redhat.com,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
"Claudio Fontana" <cfontana@suse.de>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-6.0] accel: Wire accel to /machine
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 11:13:07 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X881k+IdAzs5O1yQ@SPB-NB-133.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201207175007.GO105758@angien.pipo.sk>
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 06:50:07PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 12:38:49 -0500, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:46:22AM +0300, Roman Bolshakov wrote:
> > > There's no generic way to query current accel and its properties via QOM
> > > because there's no link between an accel and current machine.
> > >
> > > The change adds the link, i.e. if HVF is enabled the following will be
> > > available in QOM:
> > >
> > > (qemu) qom-get /machine/accel type
> > > "hvf-accel"
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> > > Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Roman Bolshakov <r.bolshakov@yadro.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > this is a follow up patch that deprecates earlier series [1].
> > >
> >
> > Is there a reference to the reasoning for dropping the earlier
> > approach? Your previous approach seems preferable.
>
> The gist of the discussion before was that deprecating old commands in
> the same release cycle as introducing the replacement might be
> problematic if libvirt wants to adapt ASAP and that the new command
> should be elevated to a intermediate tier of stability, where ACK from
> libvirt is needed to change it during the same release cycle
> incompatibly.
>
> That was meant generally for any command, and was started because we had
> a similar issue recently.
>
> My intention definitely was not to change the patch itself, but more a
> process change so that we can keep cooperating on new stuff rapidly, but
> without actually breaking what we do.
>
Thanks Peter,
I'll drop deprecation patch in v2 of query-accel QMP command.
Ragards,
Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-08 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-07 8:46 [PATCH for-6.0] accel: Wire accel to /machine Roman Bolshakov
2020-12-07 17:38 ` Eduardo Habkost
2020-12-07 17:50 ` Peter Krempa
2020-12-08 8:13 ` Roman Bolshakov [this message]
2020-12-08 8:19 ` Peter Krempa
2020-12-08 8:11 ` Roman Bolshakov
2020-12-07 17:44 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-12-08 7:40 ` Roman Bolshakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X881k+IdAzs5O1yQ@SPB-NB-133.local \
--to=r.bolshakov@yadro.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=cfontana@suse.de \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=pkrempa@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).