From: Emilio Cota <cota@braap.org>
To: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Aaron Lindsay" <aaron@os.amperecomputing.com>,
"Eli G. Boling" <eboling@draper.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] plugin: fix clearing of plugin_mem_cbs before TB exit
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 06:41:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/86BPnjTctXT4jz@cota-l14> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e1fc5734-2548-eba1-cc14-5f2a6482fba0@linaro.org>
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 10:50:26 -1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 2/21/23 18:32, Emilio Cota wrote:
> > Currently we are wrongly accessing plugin_tb->mem_helper at
> > translation time from plugin_gen_disable_mem_helpers, which is
> > called before generating a TB exit, e.g. with exit_tb.
> >
> > Recall that it is only during TB finalisation, i.e. when we go over
> > the TB post-translation to inject or remove plugin instrumentation,
> > when plugin_tb->mem_helper is set. This means that we never clear
> > plugin_mem_cbs when calling plugin_gen_disable_mem_helpers since
> > mem_helper is always false. Therefore a guest instruction that uses
> > helpers and emits an explicit TB exit results in plugin_mem_cbs being
> > set upon exiting, which is caught by an assertion as reported in
> > the reopening of issue #1381 and replicated below.
> >
> > Fix this by (1) adding an insertion point before exiting a TB
> > ("before_exit"), and (2) deciding whether or not to emit the
> > clearing of plugin_mem_cbs at this newly-added insertion point
> > during TB finalisation.
>
> This is an improvement, but incomplete, because it does not handle the
> exception exit case, via cpu_loop_exit.
AFAICT that is already handled -- see the call to
qemu_plugin_disable_mem_helpers upon returning from the longjmp
in cpu-exec.c.
I do think that doing the clearing in C as done in your series
is a better solution. It is simpler and what I most like about
it is that it generates less code. In fact I wanted to mention
that approach as an alternative in the commit log, but forgot
to do so.
Thanks,
Emilio
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-01 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-22 4:32 [PATCH] plugin: fix clearing of plugin_mem_cbs before TB exit Emilio Cota
2023-02-28 17:33 ` Frédéric Pétrot
2023-02-28 20:50 ` Richard Henderson
2023-03-01 11:41 ` Emilio Cota [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y/86BPnjTctXT4jz@cota-l14 \
--to=cota@braap.org \
--cc=aaron@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=eboling@draper.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).