qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinoud Zandijk <reinoud@NetBSD.org>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	libvir-list@redhat.com, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
	"Reinoud Zandijk" <reinoud@netbsd.org>,
	"Ryo ONODERA" <ryoon@netbsd.org>,
	"Brad Smith" <brad@comstyle.com>, "Stefan Weil" <sw@weilnetz.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate 32-bit host systems
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 17:06:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y++mEtUSmWYPTkPN@gorilla.13thmonkey.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a61cbmti.fsf@pond.sub.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 599 bytes --]

On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:36:41AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> I feel the discussion petered out without a conclusion.
> 
> I don't think letting the status quo win by inertia is a good outcome
> here.
> 
> Which 32-bit hosts are still useful, and why?

NetBSD runs on a bunch of 32 bit-only hosts (sparc32, ppc32, armv7, vax,
mips32 etc.) that all run Qemu fine. They are all actively maintained and
released as part of the main releases.

Maintaining 32 bit host support is thus vital for those machines; not everyone
runs a 64 bit system.

with regards,
Reinoud Zandijk,
NetBSD developer.


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-17 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-30 11:44 [RFC PATCH] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate 32-bit host systems Thomas Huth
2023-01-30 11:47 ` Peter Maydell
2023-01-30 12:01   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-30 12:22     ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-30 12:43       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-30 13:07         ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-30 19:19     ` Richard Henderson
2023-01-30 23:14       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-01-30 23:33         ` Richard Henderson
2023-01-31  0:19           ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-01-30 20:45     ` Alex Bennée
2023-02-05 22:12       ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2023-04-04 14:00         ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-04 14:20           ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04 15:58             ` BALATON Zoltan
2023-04-04 14:32           ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-04-04 15:42             ` BALATON Zoltan
2023-04-05  8:01               ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-05 11:54                 ` BALATON Zoltan
2023-04-05 12:51                   ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-04 15:50           ` BALATON Zoltan
2023-04-05 21:01           ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2023-02-22  9:11       ` Bernhard Beschow
2023-02-22  9:51         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-22 12:28           ` Reinoud Zandijk
2023-02-22 13:37             ` Alex Bennée
2023-02-17 10:36 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-02-17 10:40   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-17 10:45   ` Claudio Fontana
2023-02-17 10:47   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-17 11:05     ` Stefan Weil via
2023-02-17 11:43       ` Markus Armbruster
2023-02-17 11:47       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-19 11:27       ` Reinoud Zandijk
2023-02-19 12:12         ` Stefan Weil via
2023-02-17 16:38     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-02-17 17:43       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-02-17 18:57         ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-18 22:54           ` Jiaxun Yang
2023-02-17 19:49       ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-17 16:06   ` Reinoud Zandijk [this message]
2023-02-17 17:20     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-02-17 18:22     ` Richard Henderson
2023-02-19 11:07       ` Reinoud Zandijk
2023-02-17 11:09 ` Claudio Fontana

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y++mEtUSmWYPTkPN@gorilla.13thmonkey.org \
    --to=reinoud@netbsd.org \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=brad@comstyle.com \
    --cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=ryoon@netbsd.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).