qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
	"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] multifd: Create property multifd-flush-after-each-section
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:59:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+05hM4JPbfjUjn8@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230215180231.7644-2-quintela@redhat.com>

On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 07:02:29PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> We used to flush all channels at the end of each RAM section
> sent.  That is not needed, so preparing to only flush after a full
> iteration through all the RAM.
> 
> Default value of the property is false.  But we return "true" in
> migrate_multifd_flush_after_each_section() until we implement the code
> in following patches.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>

This line can be dropped, after (I assume) git commit helped to add the
other one below. :)

Normally that's also why I put R-bs before my SoB because I should have two
SoB but then I merge them into the last; git is happy with that too.

> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

But some nitpicks below (I'll leave those to you to decide whether to
rework or keep them as is..).

>
> ---
> 
> Rename each-iteration to after-each-section
> Rename multifd-sync-after-each-section to
>        multifd-flush-after-each-section
> ---
>  qapi/migration.json   | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  migration/migration.h |  1 +
>  hw/core/machine.c     |  1 +
>  migration/migration.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>  4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/qapi/migration.json b/qapi/migration.json
> index c84fa10e86..3afd81174d 100644
> --- a/qapi/migration.json
> +++ b/qapi/migration.json
> @@ -478,6 +478,24 @@
>  #                    should not affect the correctness of postcopy migration.
>  #                    (since 7.1)
>  #
> +# @multifd-flush-after-each-section: flush every channel after each
> +#                                    section sent.  This assures that
> +#                                    we can't mix pages from one
> +#                                    iteration through ram pages with
> +#                                    pages for the following
> +#                                    iteration.  We really only need
> +#                                    to do this flush after we have go
> +#                                    through all the dirty pages.
> +#                                    For historical reasons, we do
> +#                                    that after each section.  This is
> +#                                    suboptimal (we flush too many
> +#                                    times).
> +#                                    Default value is false.
> +#                                    Setting this capability has no
> +#                                    effect until the patch that
> +#                                    removes this comment.
> +#                                    (since 8.0)

IMHO the core of this new "cap" is the new RAM_SAVE_FLAG_MULTIFD_FLUSH bit
in the stream protocol, but it's not referenced here.  I would suggest
simplify the content but highlight the core change:

 @multifd-lazy-flush:  When enabled, multifd will only do sync flush after
                       each whole round of bitmap scan.  Otherwise it'll be
                       done per RAM save iteration (which happens with a much
                       higher frequency).

                       Please consider enable this as long as possible, and
                       keep this off only if any of the src/dst QEMU binary
                       doesn't support it.

                       This capability is bound to the new RAM save flag
                       RAM_SAVE_FLAG_MULTIFD_FLUSH, the new flag will only
                       be used and recognized when this feature bit set.

I know you dislike multifd-lazy-flush, but that's still the best I can come
up with when writting this (yeah I still like it :-p), please bare with me
and take whatever you think the best.

> +#
>  # Features:
>  # @unstable: Members @x-colo and @x-ignore-shared are experimental.
>  #
> @@ -492,7 +510,8 @@
>             'dirty-bitmaps', 'postcopy-blocktime', 'late-block-activate',
>             { 'name': 'x-ignore-shared', 'features': [ 'unstable' ] },
>             'validate-uuid', 'background-snapshot',
> -           'zero-copy-send', 'postcopy-preempt'] }
> +           'zero-copy-send', 'postcopy-preempt',
> +           'multifd-flush-after-each-section'] }
>  
>  ##
>  # @MigrationCapabilityStatus:
> diff --git a/migration/migration.h b/migration/migration.h
> index 2da2f8a164..7f0f4260ba 100644
> --- a/migration/migration.h
> +++ b/migration/migration.h
> @@ -424,6 +424,7 @@ int migrate_multifd_channels(void);
>  MultiFDCompression migrate_multifd_compression(void);
>  int migrate_multifd_zlib_level(void);
>  int migrate_multifd_zstd_level(void);
> +bool migrate_multifd_flush_after_each_section(void);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_LINUX
>  bool migrate_use_zero_copy_send(void);
> diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
> index f73fc4c45c..602e775f34 100644
> --- a/hw/core/machine.c
> +++ b/hw/core/machine.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ const size_t hw_compat_7_1_len = G_N_ELEMENTS(hw_compat_7_1);
>  GlobalProperty hw_compat_7_0[] = {
>      { "arm-gicv3-common", "force-8-bit-prio", "on" },
>      { "nvme-ns", "eui64-default", "on"},
> +    { "migration", "multifd-flush-after-each-section", "on"},

[same note to IRC: need to revert if rename, but otherwise don't bother]

Thanks,

>  };
>  const size_t hw_compat_7_0_len = G_N_ELEMENTS(hw_compat_7_0);
>  
> diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
> index 90fca70cb7..cfba0da005 100644
> --- a/migration/migration.c
> +++ b/migration/migration.c
> @@ -167,7 +167,8 @@ INITIALIZE_MIGRATE_CAPS_SET(check_caps_background_snapshot,
>      MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_XBZRLE,
>      MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_X_COLO,
>      MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_VALIDATE_UUID,
> -    MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_ZERO_COPY_SEND);
> +    MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_ZERO_COPY_SEND,
> +    MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_MULTIFD_FLUSH_AFTER_EACH_SECTION);
>  
>  /* When we add fault tolerance, we could have several
>     migrations at once.  For now we don't need to add
> @@ -2701,6 +2702,17 @@ bool migrate_use_multifd(void)
>      return s->enabled_capabilities[MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_MULTIFD];
>  }
>  
> +bool migrate_multifd_flush_after_each_section(void)
> +{
> +    MigrationState *s = migrate_get_current();
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Until the patch that remove this comment, we always return that
> +     * the capability is enabled.
> +     */
> +    return true || s->enabled_capabilities[MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_MULTIFD_FLUSH_AFTER_EACH_SECTION];

(I'd rather not care about what happens if someone applies only this patch
 not the latter two by dropping "true ||" directly here, but again, no a
 huge deal)

> +}
> +
>  bool migrate_pause_before_switchover(void)
>  {
>      MigrationState *s;
> @@ -4535,7 +4547,8 @@ static Property migration_properties[] = {
>      DEFINE_PROP_MIG_CAP("x-zero-copy-send",
>              MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_ZERO_COPY_SEND),
>  #endif
> -
> +    DEFINE_PROP_MIG_CAP("multifd-flush-after-each-section",
> +                        MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_MULTIFD_FLUSH_AFTER_EACH_SECTION),
>      DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.1
> 
> 

-- 
Peter Xu



  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-15 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-15 18:02 [PATCH v6 0/3] Eliminate multifd flush Juan Quintela
2023-02-15 18:02 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] multifd: Create property multifd-flush-after-each-section Juan Quintela
2023-02-15 19:59   ` Peter Xu [this message]
2023-02-15 20:13     ` Juan Quintela
2023-02-16 15:15       ` Markus Armbruster
2023-02-16 17:13         ` Juan Quintela
2023-02-17  5:53           ` Markus Armbruster
2023-02-15 18:02 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] multifd: Protect multifd_send_sync_main() calls Juan Quintela
2023-02-15 20:06   ` Peter Xu
2023-02-15 18:02 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] multifd: Only flush once each full round of memory Juan Quintela
2023-02-15 20:05   ` Peter Xu
2023-02-16 11:00     ` Juan Quintela
2023-02-16 16:44       ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y+05hM4JPbfjUjn8@x1n \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    --cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).