From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] multifd: Create property multifd-flush-after-each-section
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:59:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+05hM4JPbfjUjn8@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230215180231.7644-2-quintela@redhat.com>
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 07:02:29PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> We used to flush all channels at the end of each RAM section
> sent. That is not needed, so preparing to only flush after a full
> iteration through all the RAM.
>
> Default value of the property is false. But we return "true" in
> migrate_multifd_flush_after_each_section() until we implement the code
> in following patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
This line can be dropped, after (I assume) git commit helped to add the
other one below. :)
Normally that's also why I put R-bs before my SoB because I should have two
SoB but then I merge them into the last; git is happy with that too.
> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
But some nitpicks below (I'll leave those to you to decide whether to
rework or keep them as is..).
>
> ---
>
> Rename each-iteration to after-each-section
> Rename multifd-sync-after-each-section to
> multifd-flush-after-each-section
> ---
> qapi/migration.json | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> migration/migration.h | 1 +
> hw/core/machine.c | 1 +
> migration/migration.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/qapi/migration.json b/qapi/migration.json
> index c84fa10e86..3afd81174d 100644
> --- a/qapi/migration.json
> +++ b/qapi/migration.json
> @@ -478,6 +478,24 @@
> # should not affect the correctness of postcopy migration.
> # (since 7.1)
> #
> +# @multifd-flush-after-each-section: flush every channel after each
> +# section sent. This assures that
> +# we can't mix pages from one
> +# iteration through ram pages with
> +# pages for the following
> +# iteration. We really only need
> +# to do this flush after we have go
> +# through all the dirty pages.
> +# For historical reasons, we do
> +# that after each section. This is
> +# suboptimal (we flush too many
> +# times).
> +# Default value is false.
> +# Setting this capability has no
> +# effect until the patch that
> +# removes this comment.
> +# (since 8.0)
IMHO the core of this new "cap" is the new RAM_SAVE_FLAG_MULTIFD_FLUSH bit
in the stream protocol, but it's not referenced here. I would suggest
simplify the content but highlight the core change:
@multifd-lazy-flush: When enabled, multifd will only do sync flush after
each whole round of bitmap scan. Otherwise it'll be
done per RAM save iteration (which happens with a much
higher frequency).
Please consider enable this as long as possible, and
keep this off only if any of the src/dst QEMU binary
doesn't support it.
This capability is bound to the new RAM save flag
RAM_SAVE_FLAG_MULTIFD_FLUSH, the new flag will only
be used and recognized when this feature bit set.
I know you dislike multifd-lazy-flush, but that's still the best I can come
up with when writting this (yeah I still like it :-p), please bare with me
and take whatever you think the best.
> +#
> # Features:
> # @unstable: Members @x-colo and @x-ignore-shared are experimental.
> #
> @@ -492,7 +510,8 @@
> 'dirty-bitmaps', 'postcopy-blocktime', 'late-block-activate',
> { 'name': 'x-ignore-shared', 'features': [ 'unstable' ] },
> 'validate-uuid', 'background-snapshot',
> - 'zero-copy-send', 'postcopy-preempt'] }
> + 'zero-copy-send', 'postcopy-preempt',
> + 'multifd-flush-after-each-section'] }
>
> ##
> # @MigrationCapabilityStatus:
> diff --git a/migration/migration.h b/migration/migration.h
> index 2da2f8a164..7f0f4260ba 100644
> --- a/migration/migration.h
> +++ b/migration/migration.h
> @@ -424,6 +424,7 @@ int migrate_multifd_channels(void);
> MultiFDCompression migrate_multifd_compression(void);
> int migrate_multifd_zlib_level(void);
> int migrate_multifd_zstd_level(void);
> +bool migrate_multifd_flush_after_each_section(void);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_LINUX
> bool migrate_use_zero_copy_send(void);
> diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
> index f73fc4c45c..602e775f34 100644
> --- a/hw/core/machine.c
> +++ b/hw/core/machine.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ const size_t hw_compat_7_1_len = G_N_ELEMENTS(hw_compat_7_1);
> GlobalProperty hw_compat_7_0[] = {
> { "arm-gicv3-common", "force-8-bit-prio", "on" },
> { "nvme-ns", "eui64-default", "on"},
> + { "migration", "multifd-flush-after-each-section", "on"},
[same note to IRC: need to revert if rename, but otherwise don't bother]
Thanks,
> };
> const size_t hw_compat_7_0_len = G_N_ELEMENTS(hw_compat_7_0);
>
> diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
> index 90fca70cb7..cfba0da005 100644
> --- a/migration/migration.c
> +++ b/migration/migration.c
> @@ -167,7 +167,8 @@ INITIALIZE_MIGRATE_CAPS_SET(check_caps_background_snapshot,
> MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_XBZRLE,
> MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_X_COLO,
> MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_VALIDATE_UUID,
> - MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_ZERO_COPY_SEND);
> + MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_ZERO_COPY_SEND,
> + MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_MULTIFD_FLUSH_AFTER_EACH_SECTION);
>
> /* When we add fault tolerance, we could have several
> migrations at once. For now we don't need to add
> @@ -2701,6 +2702,17 @@ bool migrate_use_multifd(void)
> return s->enabled_capabilities[MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_MULTIFD];
> }
>
> +bool migrate_multifd_flush_after_each_section(void)
> +{
> + MigrationState *s = migrate_get_current();
> +
> + /*
> + * Until the patch that remove this comment, we always return that
> + * the capability is enabled.
> + */
> + return true || s->enabled_capabilities[MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_MULTIFD_FLUSH_AFTER_EACH_SECTION];
(I'd rather not care about what happens if someone applies only this patch
not the latter two by dropping "true ||" directly here, but again, no a
huge deal)
> +}
> +
> bool migrate_pause_before_switchover(void)
> {
> MigrationState *s;
> @@ -4535,7 +4547,8 @@ static Property migration_properties[] = {
> DEFINE_PROP_MIG_CAP("x-zero-copy-send",
> MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_ZERO_COPY_SEND),
> #endif
> -
> + DEFINE_PROP_MIG_CAP("multifd-flush-after-each-section",
> + MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_MULTIFD_FLUSH_AFTER_EACH_SECTION),
> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> };
>
> --
> 2.39.1
>
>
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-15 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-15 18:02 [PATCH v6 0/3] Eliminate multifd flush Juan Quintela
2023-02-15 18:02 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] multifd: Create property multifd-flush-after-each-section Juan Quintela
2023-02-15 19:59 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2023-02-15 20:13 ` Juan Quintela
2023-02-16 15:15 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-02-16 17:13 ` Juan Quintela
2023-02-17 5:53 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-02-15 18:02 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] multifd: Protect multifd_send_sync_main() calls Juan Quintela
2023-02-15 20:06 ` Peter Xu
2023-02-15 18:02 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] multifd: Only flush once each full round of memory Juan Quintela
2023-02-15 20:05 ` Peter Xu
2023-02-16 11:00 ` Juan Quintela
2023-02-16 16:44 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y+05hM4JPbfjUjn8@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).