From: Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk>
To: Major Saheb <majosaheb@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
k.jensen@samsung.com, philmd@linaro.org, armbru@redhat.com,
mst@redhat.com, lukasz.gieryk@linux.intel.com,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Alberto Faria <afaria@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: DMAR fault with qemu 7.2 and Ubuntu 22.04 base image
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 14:05:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+uHMm1hvP7N6sKD@cormorant.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANBBZXOtEF6Ao+Nxznf6dGOSTMX3F7iJvfOiWWngs79Bjy_YEQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1518 bytes --]
On Feb 14 17:34, Major Saheb wrote:
> Thanks Peter for the reply. I tried to connect gdb to qemu and able to
> break 'vtd_iova_to_slpte()', I dumped the following with both Ubuntu
> 20.04 base image container which is the success case and Ubuntu 22.04
> base image container which is failure case
> One thing I observed is the NvmeSQueue::dma_addr is correctly set to
> '0x800000000', however in failure case this value is 0x1196b1000. A
> closer look indicates more fields in NvmeSQueue might be corrupted,
> for example we are setting admin queue size as 512 but in failure case
> it is showing 32.
>
Hi Major,
It's obviously pretty bad if hw/nvme somehow corrupts the SQ structure,
but it's difficult to say from this output.
Are you configuring shadow doorbells (the db_addr and ei_addr's are
set in both cases)?
> > > Following is the partial qemu command line that I am using
> > >
> > > -device intel-iommu,intremap=on,caching-mode=on,eim=on,device-iotlb=on,aw-bits=48
> > >
I'm not sure if caching-mode=on and device-iotlb=on leads to any issues
here? As far as I understand, this is mostly used with stuff like vhost.
I've tested and developed vfio-based drivers against hw/nvme excessively
and I'm not using anything besides `-device intel-iommu`.
Do I undestand correctly that your setup is "just" a Ubuntu 22.04 guest
with a container and a user-space driver to interact with the nvme
devices available on the guest? No nested virtualization with vfio
passthrough?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-14 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-13 16:45 DMAR fault with qemu 7.2 and Ubuntu 22.04 base image Major Saheb
2023-02-13 22:21 ` Peter Xu
2023-02-14 12:04 ` Major Saheb
2023-02-14 13:05 ` Klaus Jensen [this message]
2023-02-14 14:56 ` Klaus Jensen
2023-02-15 6:31 ` Major Saheb
2023-02-15 7:35 ` Klaus Jensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y+uHMm1hvP7N6sKD@cormorant.local \
--to=its@irrelevant.dk \
--cc=afaria@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=k.jensen@samsung.com \
--cc=lukasz.gieryk@linux.intel.com \
--cc=majosaheb@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).