From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
peter.maydell@linaro.org, agraf@csgraf.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] docs/devel: simplify the minimal checklist
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 13:14:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y0avmWEScsC57zBt@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221012121152.1179051-4-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 01:11:51PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> The bullet points are quite long and contain process tips. Move those
> bits of the bullet to the relevant sections and link to them. Use a
> table for nicer formatting of the checklist.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> ---
> docs/devel/submitting-a-patch.rst | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> roms/qboot | 2 +-
git submodule surprise !
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-12 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-12 12:11 [RFC PATCH 0/4] docs/devel suggestions for discussion Alex Bennée
2022-10-12 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] docs/devel: add a maintainers section to development process Alex Bennée
2022-10-12 14:59 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-10-13 8:39 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-10-14 9:26 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2022-10-14 11:23 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-10-14 13:24 ` Alex Bennée
2022-10-20 10:51 ` Peter Maydell
2022-10-12 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] docs/devel: make language a little less code centric Alex Bennée
2022-10-12 15:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-10-12 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] docs/devel: simplify the minimal checklist Alex Bennée
2022-10-12 12:14 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2022-10-12 15:02 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-10-14 9:31 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2022-10-12 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] docs/devel: try and improve the language around patch review Alex Bennée
2022-10-13 8:40 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-10-12 15:02 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] docs/devel suggestions for discussion Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-10-12 15:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-10-14 9:46 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2022-10-14 11:35 ` Markus Armbruster
2022-10-14 13:31 ` Alex Bennée
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y0avmWEScsC57zBt@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@csgraf.de \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).