From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-iommu: Fail flag registration of DEVIOTLB if DT not supported
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:01:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1ADOivPsgWzOjF6@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98df60ec-be6d-84aa-d2bd-3bb2ebf0d1a5@redhat.com>
Hi, Eric,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 01:24:15PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> > @@ -1484,6 +1485,13 @@ static int amdvi_iommu_notify_flag_changed(IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu,
> > PCI_FUNC(as->devfn));
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > +
> > + if ((new & IOMMU_NOTIFIER_DEVIOTLB_UNMAP) && !x86_iommu->dt_supported) {
> > + error_setg_errno(errp, ENOTSUP,
> > + "Device-iotlb not declared support for vIOMMU");
> with current vhost code, vhost will then silently fallbac to UNMAP
> notifier registration and this will succeed. It would be nice to clarify
> whether the vIOMMU works with vhost in this downgraded mode (at least
> ats=off and device-ioltb=off)?
I'm slightly confused, why do we need to clarify that?
As we have discussed, if a device with ATS capability got attached into a
vIOMMU context that does not support ATS, then it should just work like
without ATS without any warning. Isn't this the case here?
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-19 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-18 21:54 [PATCH] x86-iommu: Fail flag registration of DEVIOTLB if DT not supported Peter Xu
2022-10-19 5:45 ` Jason Wang
2022-10-19 11:24 ` Eric Auger
2022-10-19 14:01 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2022-10-19 14:12 ` Eric Auger
2022-10-19 14:54 ` Peter Xu
2022-10-20 3:58 ` Jason Wang
2022-10-20 16:45 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1ADOivPsgWzOjF6@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).