From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, hreitz@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
nsoffer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] file-posix: fix Linux alignment probing when EIO is returned
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 19:49:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2HasGvN6qMFq29A@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y2HVgnwAPdTIaZR6@sol.localdomain>
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 07:27:16PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:00:30PM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > Linux dm-crypt returns errno EIO from unaligned O_DIRECT pread(2) calls.
>
> Citation needed. For direct I/O to block devices, the kernel's block layer
> checks the alignment before the I/O is actually submitted to the underlying
> block device. See
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/block/fops.c?h=v6.1-rc3#n306
>
> > Buglink: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1290
>
> That "bug" seems to be based on a misunderstanding of the kernel source code,
> and not any actual testing.
>
> I just tested it, and the error code is EINVAL.
>
I think I see what's happening. The kernel code was broken just a few months
ago, in v6.0 by the commit "block: relax direct io memory alignment"
(https://git.kernel.org/linus/b1a000d3b8ec582d). Now the block layer lets DIO
through when the user buffer is only aligned to the device's dma_alignment. But
a dm-crypt device has a dma_alignment of 512 even when the crypto sector size
(and thus also the logical block size) is 4096. So there is now a case where
misaligned DIO can reach dm-crypt, when that shouldn't be possible.
It also means that STATX_DIOALIGN will give the wrong value for
stx_dio_mem_align in the above case, 512 instead of 4096. This is because
STATX_DIOALIGN for block devices relies on the dma_alignment.
I'll raise this on the linux-block and dm-devel mailing lists. It would be nice
if people reported kernel bugs instead of silently working around them...
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-02 2:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-01 19:00 [PATCH 0/2] file-posix: alignment probing improvements Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-11-01 19:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] file-posix: fix Linux alignment probing when EIO is returned Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-11-02 2:27 ` Eric Biggers
2022-11-02 2:49 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2022-11-02 18:50 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-11-03 9:52 ` Kevin Wolf
2022-11-03 13:57 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-11-03 16:26 ` Eric Biggers
2022-11-03 16:54 ` Eric Biggers
2022-11-03 17:54 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-11-01 19:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] file-posix: add statx(STATX_DIOALIGN) support Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-11-02 3:32 ` Eric Biggers
2022-11-02 18:53 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2HasGvN6qMFq29A@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=nsoffer@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).