From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] block: call bdrv_co_drain_begin in a coroutine
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 16:20:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2pzzuQ4E8VIwV0u@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1a4627a3-e5c3-5ee7-d953-5719e5a019d1@yandex-team.ru>
Am 08.11.2022 um 15:33 hat Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy geschrieben:
> On 11/4/22 12:56, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> > It seems that bdrv_open_driver() forgot to create a coroutine
> > where to call bs->drv->bdrv_co_drain_begin(), a callback
> > marked as coroutine_fn.
> >
> > Because there is no active I/O at this point, the coroutine
> > should end right after entering, so the caller does not need
> > to poll until it is finished.
>
> Hmm. I see your point. But isn't it better to go the generic way and
> use a generated coroutine wrapper? Nothing guarantees that
> .bdrv_co_drain_begin() handlers will never do any yield point even on
> driver open...
>
> Look for example at bdrv_co_check(). It has a generated wrapper
> bdrv_check(), declared in include/block/block-io.h
>
> So you just need to declare the wrapper, and use it in
> bdrv_open_driver(), the code would be clearer too.
Note that if we apply the drain simplification series I sent today up to
at least patch 3 ('block: Revert .bdrv_drained_begin/end to
non-coroutine_fn') [1], then this patch isn't actually needed any more.
Kevin
[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2022-11/msg00206.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-08 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-04 9:56 [PATCH v2 0/9] Still more coroutine and various fixes in block layer Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-04 9:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] block: call bdrv_co_drain_begin in a coroutine Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-08 14:33 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-11-08 15:13 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-08 15:52 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-11-08 16:06 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-08 15:20 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2022-11-04 9:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] block-copy: add missing coroutine_fn annotations Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-08 14:48 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-11-08 15:09 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-08 16:19 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-11-08 16:30 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-11-09 12:23 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-09 23:52 ` Alberto Faria
2022-11-10 10:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-11-15 15:41 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 16:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-11-04 9:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] nbd/server.c: " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-08 14:54 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-11-04 9:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] block-backend: replace bdrv_*_above with blk_*_above Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-04 9:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] block: distinguish between bdrv_create running in coroutine and not Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-08 14:59 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2022-11-04 9:56 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] block/vmdk: add missing coroutine_fn annotations Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-04 9:56 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] block: bdrv_create_file is a coroutine_fn Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-04 9:56 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] block: bdrv_create is never called in non-coroutine context Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-08 15:23 ` Kevin Wolf
2022-11-04 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] block/dirty-bitmap: remove unnecessary qemu_in_coroutine() case Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-04 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Still more coroutine and various fixes in block layer Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2pzzuQ4E8VIwV0u@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eesposit@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).