From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: bakulinm@ispras.ru
Cc: Pavel Dovgalyuk <pavel.dovgalyuk@ispras.ru>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
alex.bennee@linaro.org, philmd@redhat.com, crosa@redhat.com,
wainersm@redhat.com, bleal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/avocado: using several workers while testing
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 14:42:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3T26+ZNRsd7ELbB@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99df713da53c1f8b726a1fdb63c8473f@ispras.ru>
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 02:37:43PM +0000, bakulinm@ispras.ru wrote:
> Valid point, thank you.
>
> I can see three options what to do:
> e1) Ignore older version of make and assume that 4.2 or newer is used
> (4.1 is in Ubuntu 18.04 that is no longer supported as a build platform
> as I was told; 20.04 has 4.2). In this case make provides number of
> jobs in $MAKEFLAGS and this makes getting it trivial. In case of an
> older make only two options will be available: (default) single-threaded,
> and using all cores.
> Which one should I choose?
Ignore older make. Ubuntu 18.04 is not a platform we target anymore,
so we shouldn't be writing compat code for handling it, and in any
case degrading to single threaded or all-cores is fine fallback IMHO.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-16 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-16 13:48 [PATCH] tests/avocado: using several workers while testing Pavel Dovgalyuk
2022-11-16 14:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-11-16 14:37 ` bakulinm
2022-11-16 14:42 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2022-11-22 11:14 ` bakulinm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3T26+ZNRsd7ELbB@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=bakulinm@ispras.ru \
--cc=bleal@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=pavel.dovgalyuk@ispras.ru \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).