qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Lindsay via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Emilio G. Cota" <cota@braap.org>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: Plugin Memory Callback Debugging
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 15:18:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3vdIHJrR1k1lmf8@strawberry.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878rkbalba.fsf@linaro.org>

On Nov 15 22:36, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Aaron Lindsay <aaron@os.amperecomputing.com> writes:
> > I believe the code *should* always reset `cpu->plugin_mem_cbs` to NULL at the
> > end of an instruction/TB's execution, so its not exactly clear to me how this
> > is occurring. However, I suspect it may be relevant that we are calling
> > `free_dyn_cb_arr()` because my plugin called `qemu_plugin_reset()`.
> 
> Hmm I'm going to have to remind myself about how this bit works.

When is it expected that cpu->plugin_mem_cbs is reset to NULL if it is
set for an instruction? Is it guaranteed it is reset by the end of the
tb? If I were to put an assertion in cpu_tb_exec() just after the call
to tcg_qemu_tb_exec(), should cpu->plugin_mem_cbs always be NULL there?

In my debugging, I *think* I'm seeing a tb set cpu->plugin_mem_cbs
for an instruction, and then not reset it to NULL. I'm wondering if its
getting optimized away or something, but want to make sure I've got my
assumptions correct about how this is intended to be working.

Thanks!

-Aaron


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-21 20:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-15 22:05 Plugin Memory Callback Debugging Aaron Lindsay
2022-11-15 22:36 ` Alex Bennée
2022-11-18 21:58   ` Aaron Lindsay via
2022-11-18 22:02     ` Aaron Lindsay
2022-11-21 22:02       ` Alex Bennée
2022-11-22 17:05         ` Aaron Lindsay via
2022-11-21 20:18   ` Aaron Lindsay via [this message]
2022-11-21 21:51     ` Alex Bennée
2022-11-22  2:22       ` Richard Henderson
2022-11-22 15:57         ` Aaron Lindsay via
2022-11-29 20:37           ` Aaron Lindsay via
2022-12-01 19:32             ` Alex Bennée
2022-12-18  5:24             ` Emilio Cota
2022-12-19 20:11               ` Aaron Lindsay
2023-01-06 10:30                 ` Alex Bennée
2023-01-07  3:07                   ` Emilio Cota
2022-11-16  6:19 ` Emilio Cota

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y3vdIHJrR1k1lmf8@strawberry.localdomain \
    --to=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=aaron@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=cota@braap.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).