From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-7.2] block-backend: avoid bdrv_unregister_buf() NULL pointer deref
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 09:21:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3yGeRWfJn2fGF9x@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221121211923.1993171-1-stefanha@redhat.com>
Am 21.11.2022 um 22:19 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> bdrv_*() APIs expect a valid BlockDriverState. Calling them with bs=NULL
> leads to undefined behavior.
>
> Jonathan Cameron reported this following NULL pointer dereference when a
> VM with a virtio-blk device and a memory-backend-file object is
> terminated:
> 1. qemu_cleanup() closes all drives, setting blk->root to NULL
> 2. qemu_cleanup() calls user_creatable_cleanup(), which results in a RAM
> block notifier callback because the memory-backend-file is destroyed.
> 3. blk_unregister_buf() is called by virtio-blk's BlockRamRegistrar
> notifier callback and undefined behavior occurs.
>
> Fixes: baf422684d73 ("virtio-blk: use BDRV_REQ_REGISTERED_BUF optimization hint")
> Co-authored-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
This raises some questions, though. What happens if the graph isn't
static between creation and deletion of the device? Do we need to do
something with registered buffers when a node is attached to or detached
from an existing device?
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-22 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-21 21:19 [PATCH for-7.2] block-backend: avoid bdrv_unregister_buf() NULL pointer deref Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-11-21 22:22 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2022-11-22 8:21 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2022-11-29 20:53 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-11-30 19:47 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3yGeRWfJn2fGF9x@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).