From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] block: convert bdrv_create to generated_co_wrapper_simple
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:16:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3yTYxW1qlJkFxaL@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221116122241.2856527-11-eesposit@redhat.com>
Am 16.11.2022 um 13:22 hat Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito geschrieben:
> This function is never called in coroutine context, therefore
> instead of manually creating a new coroutine, delegate it to the
> block-coroutine-wrapper script, defining it as g_c_w_simple.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
At first I thought that "never called in coroutine context" was not
entirely true because of paths like this:
qcow2_co_create() -> bdrv_open_blockdev_ref() -> bdrv_open_inherit() ->
bdrv_append_temp_snapshot() -> bdrv_create().
The only reason why it doesn't happen is that with a BlockdevRef, it's
impossible to get BDRV_O_SNAPSHOT set, so bdrv_append_temp_snapshot()
can't actually be called when you come from bdrv_open_blockdev_ref().
Of course, opening images in a coroutine is likely to already do similar
things. We should probably drop out of coroutine context for bdrv_open
to be safe. In practice, I suspect it might work anyway because nothing
is going to wait on the current coroutine, but maybe better not to rely
on it.
Anyway, not a problem of your patch, it's just something it made me
think of.
> diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
> index 7a4c3eb540..d3e168408a 100644
> --- a/block.c
> +++ b/block.c
> @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ typedef struct CreateCo {
> Error *err;
> } CreateCo;
>
> -static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_create(BlockDriver *drv, const char *filename,
> +int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_create(BlockDriver *drv, const char *filename,
> QemuOpts *opts, Error **errp)
The indentation is off now. With this fixed:
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-22 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-16 12:22 [PATCH v4 00/11] Still more coroutine and various fixes in block layer Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] block-copy: add missing coroutine_fn annotations Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-18 19:05 ` Kevin Wolf
2022-11-21 8:32 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-21 8:51 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-21 11:50 ` Kevin Wolf
2022-11-21 13:26 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] nbd/server.c: " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-18 19:08 ` Kevin Wolf
2022-11-16 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] block-backend: replace bdrv_*_above with blk_*_above Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-18 19:15 ` Kevin Wolf
2022-11-16 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] block-coroutine-wrapper.py: introduce generated_co_wrapper_simple Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-21 12:21 ` Kevin Wolf
2022-11-16 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] block-coroutine-wrapper.py: default to main loop aiocontext if function does not have a BlockDriverState parameter Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-21 15:30 ` Kevin Wolf
2022-11-21 15:52 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-22 8:27 ` Kevin Wolf
2022-11-16 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] block-coroutine-wrapper.py: support also basic return types Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-21 15:55 ` Kevin Wolf
2022-11-16 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] block/vmdk: add missing coroutine_fn annotations Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-21 16:01 ` Kevin Wolf
2022-11-21 16:07 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] block: distinguish between bdrv_create running in coroutine and not Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-22 8:45 ` Kevin Wolf
2022-11-16 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] block: bdrv_create_file is a coroutine_fn Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-22 8:58 ` Kevin Wolf
2022-11-22 9:04 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-16 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] block: convert bdrv_create to generated_co_wrapper_simple Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-22 9:16 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2022-11-16 12:22 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] block/dirty-bitmap: convert coroutine-only functions " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-11-22 10:04 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3yTYxW1qlJkFxaL@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eesposit@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).