From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/7] migration: Remove res_compatible parameter
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:54:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3zUsI7uNbQkabCh@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221003031600.20084-2-quintela@redhat.com>
* Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
> It was only used for RAM, and in that case, it means that this amount
> of data was sent for memory. Just delete the field in all callers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/migration/register.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
> migration/savevm.h | 4 +---
> hw/s390x/s390-stattrib.c | 6 ++----
> hw/vfio/migration.c | 10 ++++------
> migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c | 7 +++----
> migration/block.c | 7 +++----
> migration/migration.c | 9 ++++-----
> migration/ram.c | 8 +++-----
> migration/savevm.c | 14 +++++---------
> hw/vfio/trace-events | 2 +-
> migration/trace-events | 2 +-
> 11 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/migration/register.h b/include/migration/register.h
> index c1dcff0f90..1950fee6a8 100644
> --- a/include/migration/register.h
> +++ b/include/migration/register.h
> @@ -48,18 +48,18 @@ typedef struct SaveVMHandlers {
> int (*save_setup)(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque);
> void (*save_live_pending)(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque,
> uint64_t threshold_size,
> - uint64_t *res_precopy_only,
> - uint64_t *res_compatible,
> - uint64_t *res_postcopy_only);
> + uint64_t *rest_precopy,
> + uint64_t *rest_postcopy);
> /* Note for save_live_pending:
> - * - res_precopy_only is for data which must be migrated in precopy phase
> - * or in stopped state, in other words - before target vm start
> - * - res_compatible is for data which may be migrated in any phase
> - * - res_postcopy_only is for data which must be migrated in postcopy phase
> - * or in stopped state, in other words - after source vm stop
> + * - res_precopy is for data which must be migrated in precopy
> + * phase or in stopped state, in other words - before target
> + * vm start
> + * - res_postcopy is for data which must be migrated in postcopy
> + * phase or in stopped state, in other words - after source vm
> + * stop
> *
> - * Sum of res_postcopy_only, res_compatible and res_postcopy_only is the
> - * whole amount of pending data.
> + * Sum of res_precopy and res_postcopy is the whole amount of
> + * pending data.
I'm not sure if this is correct; I think we really do have three
different kinds of device:
a) Those that don't know how to postcopy
b) Those that can only send data in postcopy (which I think is what
the dirty-bitmap block stuff does)
c) Devices that know how to postcopy, like RAM
<snip>
> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> index dc1de9ddbc..20167e1102 100644
> --- a/migration/ram.c
> +++ b/migration/ram.c
> @@ -3435,9 +3435,7 @@ static int ram_save_complete(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)
> }
>
> static void ram_save_pending(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, uint64_t max_size,
> - uint64_t *res_precopy_only,
> - uint64_t *res_compatible,
> - uint64_t *res_postcopy_only)
> + uint64_t *res_precopy, uint64_t *res_postcopy)
> {
> RAMState **temp = opaque;
> RAMState *rs = *temp;
> @@ -3457,9 +3455,9 @@ static void ram_save_pending(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, uint64_t max_size,
>
> if (migrate_postcopy_ram()) {
> /* We can do postcopy, and all the data is postcopiable */
> - *res_compatible += remaining_size;
> + *res_postcopy += remaining_size;
migrate_postcopy_ram() says that postcopy is enabled, not active, so here you are saying that
ram is 'postcopy only' according to your definition above.
I don't think it actually changes behaviour though at the moment; but it
doesn't feel right to assign that to something that says 'postcopy only'
migration_iteration_run doesn't enforce the postcopy-only part very
hard; it's just part of the threshold as far as I can tell.
Dave
> } else {
> - *res_precopy_only += remaining_size;
> + *res_precopy += remaining_size;
> }
> }
> diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
> index bb8bbddfe4..440aa62f16 100644
> --- a/migration/migration.c
> +++ b/migration/migration.c
> @@ -3734,15 +3734,14 @@ typedef enum {
> */
> static MigIterateState migration_iteration_run(MigrationState *s)
> {
> - uint64_t pending_size, pend_pre, pend_compat, pend_post;
> + uint64_t pending_size, pend_pre, pend_post;
> bool in_postcopy = s->state == MIGRATION_STATUS_POSTCOPY_ACTIVE;
>
> qemu_savevm_state_pending(s->to_dst_file, s->threshold_size, &pend_pre,
> - &pend_compat, &pend_post);
> - pending_size = pend_pre + pend_compat + pend_post;
> + &pend_post);
> + pending_size = pend_pre + pend_post;
>
> - trace_migrate_pending(pending_size, s->threshold_size,
> - pend_pre, pend_compat, pend_post);
> + trace_migrate_pending(pending_size, s->threshold_size, pend_pre, pend_post);
>
> if (pending_size && pending_size >= s->threshold_size) {
> /* Still a significant amount to transfer */
> diff --git a/migration/savevm.c b/migration/savevm.c
> index 48e85c052c..a752ff9ea1 100644
> --- a/migration/savevm.c
> +++ b/migration/savevm.c
> @@ -1472,16 +1472,13 @@ flush:
> * for units that can't do postcopy.
> */
> void qemu_savevm_state_pending(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t threshold_size,
> - uint64_t *res_precopy_only,
> - uint64_t *res_compatible,
> - uint64_t *res_postcopy_only)
> + uint64_t *res_precopy,
> + uint64_t *res_postcopy)
> {
> SaveStateEntry *se;
>
> - *res_precopy_only = 0;
> - *res_compatible = 0;
> - *res_postcopy_only = 0;
> -
> + *res_precopy = 0;
> + *res_postcopy = 0;
>
> QTAILQ_FOREACH(se, &savevm_state.handlers, entry) {
> if (!se->ops || !se->ops->save_live_pending) {
> @@ -1493,8 +1490,7 @@ void qemu_savevm_state_pending(QEMUFile *f, uint64_t threshold_size,
> }
> }
> se->ops->save_live_pending(f, se->opaque, threshold_size,
> - res_precopy_only, res_compatible,
> - res_postcopy_only);
> + res_precopy, res_postcopy);
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/trace-events b/hw/vfio/trace-events
> index 73dffe9e00..a21cbd2a56 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/trace-events
> +++ b/hw/vfio/trace-events
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ vfio_save_cleanup(const char *name) " (%s)"
> vfio_save_buffer(const char *name, uint64_t data_offset, uint64_t data_size, uint64_t pending) " (%s) Offset 0x%"PRIx64" size 0x%"PRIx64" pending 0x%"PRIx64
> vfio_update_pending(const char *name, uint64_t pending) " (%s) pending 0x%"PRIx64
> vfio_save_device_config_state(const char *name) " (%s)"
> -vfio_save_pending(const char *name, uint64_t precopy, uint64_t postcopy, uint64_t compatible) " (%s) precopy 0x%"PRIx64" postcopy 0x%"PRIx64" compatible 0x%"PRIx64
> +vfio_save_pending(const char *name, uint64_t precopy, uint64_t postcopy) " (%s) precopy 0x%"PRIx64" postcopy 0x%"PRIx64
> vfio_save_iterate(const char *name, int data_size) " (%s) data_size %d"
> vfio_save_complete_precopy(const char *name) " (%s)"
> vfio_load_device_config_state(const char *name) " (%s)"
> diff --git a/migration/trace-events b/migration/trace-events
> index 57003edcbd..f2a873fd6c 100644
> --- a/migration/trace-events
> +++ b/migration/trace-events
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ migrate_fd_cleanup(void) ""
> migrate_fd_error(const char *error_desc) "error=%s"
> migrate_fd_cancel(void) ""
> migrate_handle_rp_req_pages(const char *rbname, size_t start, size_t len) "in %s at 0x%zx len 0x%zx"
> -migrate_pending(uint64_t size, uint64_t max, uint64_t pre, uint64_t compat, uint64_t post) "pending size %" PRIu64 " max %" PRIu64 " (pre = %" PRIu64 " compat=%" PRIu64 " post=%" PRIu64 ")"
> +migrate_pending(uint64_t size, uint64_t max, uint64_t pre, uint64_t post) "pending size %" PRIu64 " max %" PRIu64 " (pre = %" PRIu64 " post=%" PRIu64 ")"
> migrate_send_rp_message(int msg_type, uint16_t len) "%d: len %d"
> migrate_send_rp_recv_bitmap(char *name, int64_t size) "block '%s' size 0x%"PRIi64
> migration_completion_file_err(void) ""
> --
> 2.37.2
>
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-22 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-03 3:15 [RFC 0/7] migration patches for VFIO Juan Quintela
2022-10-03 3:15 ` [RFC 1/7] migration: Remove res_compatible parameter Juan Quintela
2022-11-22 13:54 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2022-10-03 3:15 ` [RFC 2/7] migration: No save_live_pending() method uses the QEMUFile parameter Juan Quintela
2022-11-22 17:48 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-10-03 3:15 ` [RFC 3/7] migration: Block migration comment or code is wrong Juan Quintela
2022-10-03 19:12 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2022-10-03 3:15 ` [RFC 4/7] migration: Split save_live_pending() into state_pending_* Juan Quintela
2022-11-22 20:08 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-10-03 3:15 ` [RFC 5/7] migration: Remove unused threshold_size parameter Juan Quintela
2022-11-23 16:38 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-10-03 3:15 ` [RFC 6/7] migration: simplify migration_iteration_run() Juan Quintela
2022-11-23 17:39 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2022-10-03 3:16 ` [RFC 7/7] migration: call qemu_savevm_state_pending_exact() with the guest stopped Juan Quintela
2022-10-13 12:25 ` Joao Martins
2022-10-13 16:08 ` Juan Quintela
2022-10-14 10:36 ` Joao Martins
2022-10-14 11:28 ` Juan Quintela
2022-10-14 12:29 ` Joao Martins
2022-10-18 12:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe via
2022-10-19 15:51 ` Yishai Hadas
2022-10-14 19:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-20 14:56 ` [RFC 0/7] migration patches for VFIO Yishai Hadas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y3zUsI7uNbQkabCh@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).