From: Shreesh Adiga <16567adigashreesh@gmail.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, jasowang@redhat.com, andrew@daynix.com,
yuri.benditovich@daynix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ebpf: fix compatibility with libbpf 1.0+
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 19:14:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y6Bq1nQwu6DitPLY@arch.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y6BDeYCy309Ug4G5@redhat.com>
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 10:56:57AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 08:09:27PM +0530, Shreesh Adiga wrote:
> > The current implementation fails to load on a system with
> > libbpf 1.0 and reports that legacy map definitions in 'maps'
> > section are not supported by libbpf v1.0+. This commit updates
> > the Makefile to add BTF (-g flag) and appropriately updates
> > the maps in rss.bpf.c and update the skeleton file in repo.
>
> Can you split this into two pieces - one updating the build
> system for new compiler usage, and one updating the program
> to remove the legacy map defs.
>
If I just update the Makefile first, rss.bpf.c doesn't compile
and throws error:
rss.bpf.c:80:1: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct bpf_map_def'
Similarly if first rss.bpf.c only is updated, then error is thrown:
libbpf: BTF is required, but is missing or corrupted
Hence, it would seem logical to update both of them together in same
commit.
Do you mean first commit should update the Makefile and rss.bpf.c
together and second commit should be updating the rss.bpf.skeleton.h
file? I was under the impression that every commit should result in
compilable sources, hence wanted to clarify this.
Thanks,
Shreesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-19 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-18 14:39 [PATCH] ebpf: fix compatibility with libbpf 1.0+ Shreesh Adiga
2022-12-18 16:15 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2022-12-20 16:30 ` Shreesh Adiga
2022-12-28 16:19 ` Andrew Melnichenko
2023-02-14 20:10 ` Andrew Melnichenko
2023-02-16 5:28 ` Jason Wang
2022-12-19 10:56 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-12-19 13:44 ` Shreesh Adiga [this message]
2022-12-19 13:49 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-12-20 14:02 ` Shreesh Adiga
2022-12-20 14:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y6Bq1nQwu6DitPLY@arch.localdomain \
--to=16567adigashreesh@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@daynix.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yuri.benditovich@daynix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).