From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E2C3C54EBD for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 15:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pEtih-0005dB-RX; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 10:05:51 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pEtie-0005aS-Ty for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 10:05:48 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pEtid-0004nB-0H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 10:05:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1673276743; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=CDdCqu1yle6f5NoNmhvVbJnLg923QayWCBQuVAG2z44=; b=jFncORPFGluumIEU8P1JX6EJNBPHOe46R8m8PK10jsM0x4woFbWgiW3w1GLZQgp+VlpgCs oAOAiXWhvYvPrO82tE/YuJKPQDykowspLvPYBapaI4oskADhsjzJiSHzPpjSVKcpTJIpFE uJOw1o+PMRtEipRLmvJXYj3LFHbFFhg= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-526-alfL5uYRN2Obwp6RIUvb7g-1; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 10:05:42 -0500 X-MC-Unique: alfL5uYRN2Obwp6RIUvb7g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EC6D1991C6C; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 15:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.33.37.5]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76825492B00; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 15:05:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 15:05:35 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Tom Lendacky Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Eric Blake , Markus Armbruster , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Paolo Bonzini , Marcelo Tosatti , Michael Roth Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Qemu SEV reduced-phys-bits fixes Message-ID: References: <82c766a6-fe48-fe01-a3ec-5adb320fed75@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <82c766a6-fe48-fe01-a3ec-5adb320fed75@amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.7 (2022-08-07) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.10 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 12:13:09PM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote: > On 9/30/22 10:14, Tom Lendacky wrote: > > This patch series fixes up and tries to remove some confusion around the > > SEV reduced-phys-bits parameter. > > > > Based on the "AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 2: System > > Programming", section "15.34.6 Page Table Support" [1], a guest should > > only ever see a maximum of 1 bit of physical address space reduction. > > > > - Update the documentation, to change the default value from 5 to 1. > > - Update the validation of the parameter to ensure the parameter value > > is within the range of the CPUID field that it is reported in. To allow > > for backwards compatibility, especially to support the previously > > documented value of 5, allow the full range of values from 1 to 63 > > (0 was never allowed). > > - Update the setting of CPUID 0x8000001F_EBX to limit the values to the > > field width that they are setting as an additional safeguard. > > > > [1] https://www.amd.com/system/files/TechDocs/24593.pdf > > Ping, any concerns with this series? Looks like you got postive review from David in Oct, so this needs one of the x86 maintainers to queue the series. > > Tom Lendacky (4): > > qapi, i386/sev: Change the reduced-phys-bits value from 5 to 1 > > qemu-options.hx: Update the reduced-phys-bits documentation > > i386/sev: Update checks and information related to reduced-phys-bits > > i386/cpu: Update how the EBX register of CPUID 0x8000001F is set > > > > qapi/misc-target.json | 2 +- > > qemu-options.hx | 4 ++-- > > target/i386/cpu.c | 4 ++-- > > target/i386/sev.c | 17 ++++++++++++++--- > > 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|