[PATCH v4 0/2] arm: enable MTE for QEMU + kvm

[PATCH v4 0/2] arm: enable MTE for QEMU + kvm

[Cornelia Huck]

Here's another repost of my kvm/mte series; no substantial changes.

Changes v3->v4:
- rebase to current master
- tweak message when specifying "mte=on" for the virt machine for non-tcg
- added Thomas' ack for the qtests patch

Cornelia Huck (2):
  arm/kvm: add support for MTE
  qtests/arm: add some mte tests

 docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst |  21 +++++
 hw/arm/virt.c                    |   2 +-
 target/arm/cpu.c                 |  18 ++---
 target/arm/cpu.h                 |   1 +
 target/arm/cpu64.c               | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 target/arm/internals.h           |   1 +
 target/arm/kvm64.c               |   5 ++
 target/arm/kvm_arm.h             |  12 +++
 target/arm/monitor.c             |   1 +
 tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c   |  76 ++++++++++++++++++
 10 files changed, 257 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

-- 
2.39.0

[PATCH v4 1/2] arm/kvm: add support for MTE

[Cornelia Huck]

Introduce a new cpu feature flag to control MTE support. To preserve
backwards compatibility for tcg, MTE will continue to be enabled as
long as tag memory has been provided.

If MTE has been enabled, we need to disable migration, as we do not
yet have a way to migrate the tags as well. Therefore, MTE will stay
off with KVM unless requested explicitly.

Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
---
 docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst |  21 +++++
 hw/arm/virt.c                    |   2 +-
 target/arm/cpu.c                 |  18 ++---
 target/arm/cpu.h                 |   1 +
 target/arm/cpu64.c               | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 target/arm/internals.h           |   1 +
 target/arm/kvm64.c               |   5 ++
 target/arm/kvm_arm.h             |  12 +++
 target/arm/monitor.c             |   1 +
 9 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst b/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
index 00c444042ff5..e278650c837e 100644
--- a/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
+++ b/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
@@ -443,3 +443,24 @@ As with ``sve-default-vector-length``, if the default length is larger
 than the maximum vector length enabled, the actual vector length will
 be reduced.  If this property is set to ``-1`` then the default vector
 length is set to the maximum possible length.
+
+MTE CPU Property
+================
+
+The ``mte`` property controls the Memory Tagging Extension. For TCG, it requires
+presence of tag memory (which can be turned on for the ``virt`` machine via
+``mte=on``). For KVM, it requires the ``KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE`` capability; until
+proper migration support is implemented, enabling MTE will install a migration
+blocker.
+
+If not specified explicitly via ``on`` or ``off``, MTE will be available
+according to the following rules:
+
+* When TCG is used, MTE will be available iff tag memory is available; i.e. it
+  preserves the behaviour prior to introduction of the feature.
+
+* When KVM is used, MTE will default to off, so that migration will not
+  unintentionally be blocked.
+
+* Other accelerators currently don't support MTE.
+
diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
index ea2413a0bad7..42359e256ad0 100644
--- a/hw/arm/virt.c
+++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
@@ -2136,7 +2136,7 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
 
     if (vms->mte && (kvm_enabled() || hvf_enabled())) {
         error_report("mach-virt: %s does not support providing "
-                     "MTE to the guest CPU",
+                     "emulated MTE to the guest CPU",
                      kvm_enabled() ? "KVM" : "HVF");
         exit(1);
     }
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
index 5f63316dbf22..decab743d0d5 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
@@ -1529,6 +1529,11 @@ void arm_cpu_finalize_features(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
             error_propagate(errp, local_err);
             return;
         }
+        arm_cpu_mte_finalize(cpu, &local_err);
+        if (local_err != NULL) {
+            error_propagate(errp, local_err);
+            return;
+        }
     }
 #endif
 
@@ -1605,7 +1610,7 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
         }
         if (cpu->tag_memory) {
             error_setg(errp,
-                       "Cannot enable %s when guest CPUs has MTE enabled",
+                       "Cannot enable %s when guest CPUs has tag memory enabled",
                        current_accel_name());
             return;
         }
@@ -1984,17 +1989,6 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
                                        ID_PFR1, VIRTUALIZATION, 0);
     }
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
-    if (cpu->tag_memory == NULL && cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mte, cpu)) {
-        /*
-         * Disable the MTE feature bits if we do not have tag-memory
-         * provided by the machine.
-         */
-        cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr1 =
-            FIELD_DP64(cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr1, ID_AA64PFR1, MTE, 0);
-    }
-#endif
-
     if (tcg_enabled()) {
         /*
          * Don't report the Statistical Profiling Extension in the ID
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index bf2bce046d56..f1a9015a7ed7 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -1038,6 +1038,7 @@ struct ArchCPU {
     bool prop_pauth;
     bool prop_pauth_impdef;
     bool prop_lpa2;
+    OnOffAuto prop_mte;
 
     /* DCZ blocksize, in log_2(words), ie low 4 bits of DCZID_EL0 */
     uint32_t dcz_blocksize;
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c
index 0e021960fb5b..3cf42ee05ca3 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu64.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c
@@ -29,6 +29,13 @@
 #include "qapi/visitor.h"
 #include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
 #include "internals.h"
+#include "migration/blocker.h"
+#include "qapi/qapi-visit-common.h"
+#include "hw/arm/virt.h"
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
+static Error *mte_migration_blocker;
+#endif
 
 static void aarch64_a35_initfn(Object *obj)
 {
@@ -1096,6 +1103,130 @@ static void aarch64_neoverse_n1_initfn(Object *obj)
     cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x410c3000;
 }
 
+static void aarch64_cpu_get_mte(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
+                                void *opaque, Error **errp)
+{
+    ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
+    OnOffAuto mte = cpu->prop_mte;
+
+    visit_type_OnOffAuto(v, name, &mte, errp);
+}
+
+static void aarch64_cpu_set_mte(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
+                                void *opaque, Error **errp)
+{
+    ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
+
+    visit_type_OnOffAuto(v, name, &cpu->prop_mte, errp);
+
+}
+
+static void aarch64_add_mte_properties(Object *obj)
+{
+    /*
+     * For tcg, "AUTO" means turn on mte if tag memory has been provided, and
+     * turn it off (without error) if not.
+     * For kvm, "AUTO" currently means mte off, as migration is not supported
+     * yet.
+     * For all others, "AUTO" means mte off.
+     */
+    object_property_add(obj, "mte", "OnOffAuto", aarch64_cpu_get_mte,
+                        aarch64_cpu_set_mte, NULL, NULL);
+}
+
+static inline bool arm_machine_has_tag_memory(void)
+{
+#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
+    Object *obj = object_dynamic_cast(qdev_get_machine(), TYPE_VIRT_MACHINE);
+
+    /* so far, only the virt machine has support for tag memory */
+    if (obj) {
+        VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(obj);
+
+        return vms->mte;
+    }
+#endif
+    return false;
+}
+
+void arm_cpu_mte_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
+{
+    bool enable_mte;
+
+    switch (cpu->prop_mte) {
+    case ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF:
+        enable_mte = false;
+        break;
+    case ON_OFF_AUTO_ON:
+        if (!kvm_enabled()) {
+            if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mte, cpu)) {
+                if (!arm_machine_has_tag_memory()) {
+                    error_setg(errp, "mte=on requires tag memory");
+                    return;
+                }
+            } else {
+                error_setg(errp, "mte not provided");
+                return;
+            }
+        }
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
+        if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_mte_supported()) {
+            error_setg(errp, "mte not supported by kvm");
+            return;
+        }
+#endif
+        enable_mte = true;
+        break;
+    default: /* AUTO */
+        if (!kvm_enabled()) {
+            if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mte, cpu)) {
+                /*
+                 * Tie mte enablement to presence of tag memory, in order to
+                 * preserve pre-existing behaviour.
+                 */
+                enable_mte = arm_machine_has_tag_memory();
+            } else {
+                enable_mte = false;
+            }
+            break;
+        } else {
+            /*
+             * This cannot yet be
+             * enable_mte = kvm_arm_mte_supported();
+             * as we don't support migration yet.
+             */
+            enable_mte = false;
+        }
+    }
+
+    if (!enable_mte) {
+        /* Disable MTE feature bits. */
+        cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr1 =
+            FIELD_DP64(cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr1, ID_AA64PFR1, MTE, 0);
+        return;
+    }
+
+    /* accelerator-specific enablement */
+    if (kvm_enabled()) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
+        if (kvm_vm_enable_cap(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE, 0)) {
+            error_setg(errp, "Failed to enable KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE");
+        } else {
+            /* TODO: add proper migration support with MTE enabled */
+            if (!mte_migration_blocker) {
+                error_setg(&mte_migration_blocker,
+                           "Live migration disabled due to MTE enabled");
+                if (migrate_add_blocker(mte_migration_blocker, NULL)) {
+                    error_setg(errp, "Failed to add MTE migration blocker");
+                    error_free(mte_migration_blocker);
+                    mte_migration_blocker = NULL;
+                }
+            }
+        }
+#endif
+    }
+}
+
 static void aarch64_host_initfn(Object *obj)
 {
 #if defined(CONFIG_KVM)
@@ -1104,6 +1235,7 @@ static void aarch64_host_initfn(Object *obj)
     if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64)) {
         aarch64_add_sve_properties(obj);
         aarch64_add_pauth_properties(obj);
+        aarch64_add_mte_properties(obj);
     }
 #elif defined(CONFIG_HVF)
     ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
@@ -1300,6 +1432,7 @@ static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj)
     object_property_add(obj, "sve-max-vq", "uint32", cpu_max_get_sve_max_vq,
                         cpu_max_set_sve_max_vq, NULL, NULL);
     qdev_property_add_static(DEVICE(obj), &arm_cpu_lpa2_property);
+    aarch64_add_mte_properties(obj);
 }
 
 static const ARMCPUInfo aarch64_cpus[] = {
diff --git a/target/arm/internals.h b/target/arm/internals.h
index d9555309df0f..4dc6d19be42b 100644
--- a/target/arm/internals.h
+++ b/target/arm/internals.h
@@ -1348,6 +1348,7 @@ void arm_cpu_sve_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
 void arm_cpu_sme_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
 void arm_cpu_pauth_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
 void arm_cpu_lpa2_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
+void arm_cpu_mte_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
diff --git a/target/arm/kvm64.c b/target/arm/kvm64.c
index 1197253d12f7..b777bd0a11d2 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm64.c
+++ b/target/arm/kvm64.c
@@ -764,6 +764,11 @@ bool kvm_arm_steal_time_supported(void)
     return kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_STEAL_TIME);
 }
 
+bool kvm_arm_mte_supported(void)
+{
+    return kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE);
+}
+
 QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(KVM_ARM64_SVE_VQ_MIN != 1);
 
 uint32_t kvm_arm_sve_get_vls(CPUState *cs)
diff --git a/target/arm/kvm_arm.h b/target/arm/kvm_arm.h
index 99017b635ce4..762443f8a7c0 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm_arm.h
+++ b/target/arm/kvm_arm.h
@@ -305,6 +305,13 @@ bool kvm_arm_pmu_supported(void);
  */
 bool kvm_arm_sve_supported(void);
 
+/**
+ * kvm_arm_mte_supported:
+ *
+ * Returns: true if KVM can enable MTE, and false otherwise.
+ */
+bool kvm_arm_mte_supported(void);
+
 /**
  * kvm_arm_get_max_vm_ipa_size:
  * @ms: Machine state handle
@@ -395,6 +402,11 @@ static inline bool kvm_arm_steal_time_supported(void)
     return false;
 }
 
+static inline bool kvm_arm_mte_supported(void)
+{
+    return false;
+}
+
 /*
  * These functions should never actually be called without KVM support.
  */
diff --git a/target/arm/monitor.c b/target/arm/monitor.c
index ecdd5ee81742..c419c81612ed 100644
--- a/target/arm/monitor.c
+++ b/target/arm/monitor.c
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ static const char *cpu_model_advertised_features[] = {
     "sve1408", "sve1536", "sve1664", "sve1792", "sve1920", "sve2048",
     "kvm-no-adjvtime", "kvm-steal-time",
     "pauth", "pauth-impdef",
+    "mte",
     NULL
 };
 
-- 
2.39.0

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] arm/kvm: add support for MTE

[Peter Maydell]

On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 16:13, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Introduce a new cpu feature flag to control MTE support. To preserve
> backwards compatibility for tcg, MTE will continue to be enabled as
> long as tag memory has been provided.
>
> If MTE has been enabled, we need to disable migration, as we do not
> yet have a way to migrate the tags as well. Therefore, MTE will stay
> off with KVM unless requested explicitly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> ---
>  docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst |  21 +++++
>  hw/arm/virt.c                    |   2 +-
>  target/arm/cpu.c                 |  18 ++---
>  target/arm/cpu.h                 |   1 +
>  target/arm/cpu64.c               | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  target/arm/internals.h           |   1 +
>  target/arm/kvm64.c               |   5 ++
>  target/arm/kvm_arm.h             |  12 +++
>  target/arm/monitor.c             |   1 +
>  9 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst b/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
> index 00c444042ff5..e278650c837e 100644
> --- a/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
> +++ b/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
> @@ -443,3 +443,24 @@ As with ``sve-default-vector-length``, if the default length is larger
>  than the maximum vector length enabled, the actual vector length will
>  be reduced.  If this property is set to ``-1`` then the default vector
>  length is set to the maximum possible length.
> +
> +MTE CPU Property
> +================
> +
> +The ``mte`` property controls the Memory Tagging Extension. For TCG, it requires
> +presence of tag memory (which can be turned on for the ``virt`` machine via
> +``mte=on``). For KVM, it requires the ``KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE`` capability; until
> +proper migration support is implemented, enabling MTE will install a migration
> +blocker.
> +
> +If not specified explicitly via ``on`` or ``off``, MTE will be available
> +according to the following rules:
> +
> +* When TCG is used, MTE will be available iff tag memory is available; i.e. it
> +  preserves the behaviour prior to introduction of the feature.
> +
> +* When KVM is used, MTE will default to off, so that migration will not
> +  unintentionally be blocked.
> +
> +* Other accelerators currently don't support MTE.

Minor nits for the documentation:
we should expand out "if and only if" -- not everybody recognizes
"iff", especially if they're not native English speakers or not
mathematicians.

Should we write specifically that in a future QEMU version KVM
might change to defaulting to "on if available" when migration
support is implemented?

thanks
-- PMM

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] arm/kvm: add support for MTE

[Dr. David Alan Gilbert]

* Peter Maydell (peter.maydell@linaro.org) wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 16:13, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Introduce a new cpu feature flag to control MTE support. To preserve
> > backwards compatibility for tcg, MTE will continue to be enabled as
> > long as tag memory has been provided.
> >
> > If MTE has been enabled, we need to disable migration, as we do not
> > yet have a way to migrate the tags as well. Therefore, MTE will stay
> > off with KVM unless requested explicitly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst |  21 +++++
> >  hw/arm/virt.c                    |   2 +-
> >  target/arm/cpu.c                 |  18 ++---
> >  target/arm/cpu.h                 |   1 +
> >  target/arm/cpu64.c               | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  target/arm/internals.h           |   1 +
> >  target/arm/kvm64.c               |   5 ++
> >  target/arm/kvm_arm.h             |  12 +++
> >  target/arm/monitor.c             |   1 +
> >  9 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst b/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
> > index 00c444042ff5..e278650c837e 100644
> > --- a/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
> > +++ b/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
> > @@ -443,3 +443,24 @@ As with ``sve-default-vector-length``, if the default length is larger
> >  than the maximum vector length enabled, the actual vector length will
> >  be reduced.  If this property is set to ``-1`` then the default vector
> >  length is set to the maximum possible length.
> > +
> > +MTE CPU Property
> > +================
> > +
> > +The ``mte`` property controls the Memory Tagging Extension. For TCG, it requires
> > +presence of tag memory (which can be turned on for the ``virt`` machine via
> > +``mte=on``). For KVM, it requires the ``KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE`` capability; until
> > +proper migration support is implemented, enabling MTE will install a migration
> > +blocker.
> > +
> > +If not specified explicitly via ``on`` or ``off``, MTE will be available
> > +according to the following rules:
> > +
> > +* When TCG is used, MTE will be available iff tag memory is available; i.e. it
> > +  preserves the behaviour prior to introduction of the feature.
> > +
> > +* When KVM is used, MTE will default to off, so that migration will not
> > +  unintentionally be blocked.
> > +
> > +* Other accelerators currently don't support MTE.
> 
> Minor nits for the documentation:
> we should expand out "if and only if" -- not everybody recognizes
> "iff", especially if they're not native English speakers or not
> mathematicians.
> 
> Should we write specifically that in a future QEMU version KVM
> might change to defaulting to "on if available" when migration
> support is implemented?

Please make sure if you do something like that, that the failure
is obious; 'on if available' gets messy for things like libvirt
and higher level tools detecting features that are available and
machines they can migrate to.

Dave

> thanks
> -- PMM
> 
-- 
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] arm/kvm: add support for MTE

[Cornelia Huck]

On Tue, Jan 17 2023, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> wrote:

> * Peter Maydell (peter.maydell@linaro.org) wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 16:13, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Introduce a new cpu feature flag to control MTE support. To preserve
>> > backwards compatibility for tcg, MTE will continue to be enabled as
>> > long as tag memory has been provided.
>> >
>> > If MTE has been enabled, we need to disable migration, as we do not
>> > yet have a way to migrate the tags as well. Therefore, MTE will stay
>> > off with KVM unless requested explicitly.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
>> > ---
>> >  docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst |  21 +++++
>> >  hw/arm/virt.c                    |   2 +-
>> >  target/arm/cpu.c                 |  18 ++---
>> >  target/arm/cpu.h                 |   1 +
>> >  target/arm/cpu64.c               | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >  target/arm/internals.h           |   1 +
>> >  target/arm/kvm64.c               |   5 ++
>> >  target/arm/kvm_arm.h             |  12 +++
>> >  target/arm/monitor.c             |   1 +
>> >  9 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst b/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
>> > index 00c444042ff5..e278650c837e 100644
>> > --- a/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
>> > +++ b/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
>> > @@ -443,3 +443,24 @@ As with ``sve-default-vector-length``, if the default length is larger
>> >  than the maximum vector length enabled, the actual vector length will
>> >  be reduced.  If this property is set to ``-1`` then the default vector
>> >  length is set to the maximum possible length.
>> > +
>> > +MTE CPU Property
>> > +================
>> > +
>> > +The ``mte`` property controls the Memory Tagging Extension. For TCG, it requires
>> > +presence of tag memory (which can be turned on for the ``virt`` machine via
>> > +``mte=on``). For KVM, it requires the ``KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE`` capability; until
>> > +proper migration support is implemented, enabling MTE will install a migration
>> > +blocker.
>> > +
>> > +If not specified explicitly via ``on`` or ``off``, MTE will be available
>> > +according to the following rules:
>> > +
>> > +* When TCG is used, MTE will be available iff tag memory is available; i.e. it
>> > +  preserves the behaviour prior to introduction of the feature.
>> > +
>> > +* When KVM is used, MTE will default to off, so that migration will not
>> > +  unintentionally be blocked.
>> > +
>> > +* Other accelerators currently don't support MTE.
>> 
>> Minor nits for the documentation:
>> we should expand out "if and only if" -- not everybody recognizes
>> "iff", especially if they're not native English speakers or not
>> mathematicians.
>> 
>> Should we write specifically that in a future QEMU version KVM
>> might change to defaulting to "on if available" when migration
>> support is implemented?
>
> Please make sure if you do something like that, that the failure
> is obious; 'on if available' gets messy for things like libvirt
> and higher level tools detecting features that are available and
> machines they can migrate to.

I guess we can just keep the door open but decline walking through it if
we fail to come up with a good solution...

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] arm/kvm: add support for MTE

[Dr. David Alan Gilbert]

* Cornelia Huck (cohuck@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17 2023, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > * Peter Maydell (peter.maydell@linaro.org) wrote:
> >> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 16:13, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Introduce a new cpu feature flag to control MTE support. To preserve
> >> > backwards compatibility for tcg, MTE will continue to be enabled as
> >> > long as tag memory has been provided.
> >> >
> >> > If MTE has been enabled, we need to disable migration, as we do not
> >> > yet have a way to migrate the tags as well. Therefore, MTE will stay
> >> > off with KVM unless requested explicitly.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> >> > ---
> >> >  docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst |  21 +++++
> >> >  hw/arm/virt.c                    |   2 +-
> >> >  target/arm/cpu.c                 |  18 ++---
> >> >  target/arm/cpu.h                 |   1 +
> >> >  target/arm/cpu64.c               | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >  target/arm/internals.h           |   1 +
> >> >  target/arm/kvm64.c               |   5 ++
> >> >  target/arm/kvm_arm.h             |  12 +++
> >> >  target/arm/monitor.c             |   1 +
> >> >  9 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst b/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
> >> > index 00c444042ff5..e278650c837e 100644
> >> > --- a/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
> >> > +++ b/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
> >> > @@ -443,3 +443,24 @@ As with ``sve-default-vector-length``, if the default length is larger
> >> >  than the maximum vector length enabled, the actual vector length will
> >> >  be reduced.  If this property is set to ``-1`` then the default vector
> >> >  length is set to the maximum possible length.
> >> > +
> >> > +MTE CPU Property
> >> > +================
> >> > +
> >> > +The ``mte`` property controls the Memory Tagging Extension. For TCG, it requires
> >> > +presence of tag memory (which can be turned on for the ``virt`` machine via
> >> > +``mte=on``). For KVM, it requires the ``KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE`` capability; until
> >> > +proper migration support is implemented, enabling MTE will install a migration
> >> > +blocker.
> >> > +
> >> > +If not specified explicitly via ``on`` or ``off``, MTE will be available
> >> > +according to the following rules:
> >> > +
> >> > +* When TCG is used, MTE will be available iff tag memory is available; i.e. it
> >> > +  preserves the behaviour prior to introduction of the feature.
> >> > +
> >> > +* When KVM is used, MTE will default to off, so that migration will not
> >> > +  unintentionally be blocked.
> >> > +
> >> > +* Other accelerators currently don't support MTE.
> >> 
> >> Minor nits for the documentation:
> >> we should expand out "if and only if" -- not everybody recognizes
> >> "iff", especially if they're not native English speakers or not
> >> mathematicians.
> >> 
> >> Should we write specifically that in a future QEMU version KVM
> >> might change to defaulting to "on if available" when migration
> >> support is implemented?
> >
> > Please make sure if you do something like that, that the failure
> > is obious; 'on if available' gets messy for things like libvirt
> > and higher level tools detecting features that are available and
> > machines they can migrate to.
> 
> I guess we can just keep the door open but decline walking through it if
> we fail to come up with a good solution...

Yeh; at least make sure that any migration failure gives an obvious
message in the log.

Dave

-- 
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] arm/kvm: add support for MTE

[Peter Maydell]

On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 16:51, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
<dgilbert@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> * Peter Maydell (peter.maydell@linaro.org) wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 16:13, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > +MTE CPU Property
> > > +================
> > > +
> > > +The ``mte`` property controls the Memory Tagging Extension. For TCG, it requires
> > > +presence of tag memory (which can be turned on for the ``virt`` machine via
> > > +``mte=on``). For KVM, it requires the ``KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE`` capability; until
> > > +proper migration support is implemented, enabling MTE will install a migration
> > > +blocker.
> > > +
> > > +If not specified explicitly via ``on`` or ``off``, MTE will be available
> > > +according to the following rules:
> > > +
> > > +* When TCG is used, MTE will be available iff tag memory is available; i.e. it
> > > +  preserves the behaviour prior to introduction of the feature.
> > > +
> > > +* When KVM is used, MTE will default to off, so that migration will not
> > > +  unintentionally be blocked.
> > > +
> > > +* Other accelerators currently don't support MTE.
> >
> > Minor nits for the documentation:
> > we should expand out "if and only if" -- not everybody recognizes
> > "iff", especially if they're not native English speakers or not
> > mathematicians.
> >
> > Should we write specifically that in a future QEMU version KVM
> > might change to defaulting to "on if available" when migration
> > support is implemented?
>
> Please make sure if you do something like that, that the failure
> is obious; 'on if available' gets messy for things like libvirt
> and higher level tools detecting features that are available and
> machines they can migrate to.

If we have a plan for how this ought to work when we eventually
implement migration support that's great and we should document
it. My point is really "we should make sure we don't box ourselves
into a set of defaults that we regret in the future, eg where
TCG and KVM always have different defaults forever". If we don't
have a plan for what the future is, then I'd rather we delayed
adding MTE-without-migration-support until we've determined that
plan.

Though the default for the CPU property is a bit moot, because
at the machine level we only implement tag memory on the virt
board, and there we disable it at the machine level (ie the
machine property 'mte' defaults to 'false').

thanks
-- PMM

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] arm/kvm: add support for MTE

[Dr. David Alan Gilbert]

* Peter Maydell (peter.maydell@linaro.org) wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 16:51, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> <dgilbert@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > * Peter Maydell (peter.maydell@linaro.org) wrote:
> > > On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 16:13, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > +MTE CPU Property
> > > > +================
> > > > +
> > > > +The ``mte`` property controls the Memory Tagging Extension. For TCG, it requires
> > > > +presence of tag memory (which can be turned on for the ``virt`` machine via
> > > > +``mte=on``). For KVM, it requires the ``KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE`` capability; until
> > > > +proper migration support is implemented, enabling MTE will install a migration
> > > > +blocker.
> > > > +
> > > > +If not specified explicitly via ``on`` or ``off``, MTE will be available
> > > > +according to the following rules:
> > > > +
> > > > +* When TCG is used, MTE will be available iff tag memory is available; i.e. it
> > > > +  preserves the behaviour prior to introduction of the feature.
> > > > +
> > > > +* When KVM is used, MTE will default to off, so that migration will not
> > > > +  unintentionally be blocked.
> > > > +
> > > > +* Other accelerators currently don't support MTE.
> > >
> > > Minor nits for the documentation:
> > > we should expand out "if and only if" -- not everybody recognizes
> > > "iff", especially if they're not native English speakers or not
> > > mathematicians.
> > >
> > > Should we write specifically that in a future QEMU version KVM
> > > might change to defaulting to "on if available" when migration
> > > support is implemented?
> >
> > Please make sure if you do something like that, that the failure
> > is obious; 'on if available' gets messy for things like libvirt
> > and higher level tools detecting features that are available and
> > machines they can migrate to.
> 
> If we have a plan for how this ought to work when we eventually
> implement migration support that's great and we should document
> it. My point is really "we should make sure we don't box ourselves
> into a set of defaults that we regret in the future, eg where
> TCG and KVM always have different defaults forever". If we don't
> have a plan for what the future is, then I'd rather we delayed
> adding MTE-without-migration-support until we've determined that
> plan.
> 
> Though the default for the CPU property is a bit moot, because
> at the machine level we only implement tag memory on the virt
> board, and there we disable it at the machine level (ie the
> machine property 'mte' defaults to 'false').

Oh, if you're disabling it at the machine level that's fine;
with versioned machine types the answer then is to turn it on
at the machine level when it all works, and that keeps the old
machine types with it off, and then VMs migrating with the old
machine type don't get confused.

(Having said that, there are always odd rules around CPU flags and
machine types and what libvirt thinks of them, but I'd ask a libvirt
person (jdenemar) for more details if needed).

Dave

> thanks
> -- PMM
> 
-- 
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] arm/kvm: add support for MTE

[Cornelia Huck]

On Tue, Jan 17 2023, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 16:13, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Introduce a new cpu feature flag to control MTE support. To preserve
>> backwards compatibility for tcg, MTE will continue to be enabled as
>> long as tag memory has been provided.
>>
>> If MTE has been enabled, we need to disable migration, as we do not
>> yet have a way to migrate the tags as well. Therefore, MTE will stay
>> off with KVM unless requested explicitly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst |  21 +++++
>>  hw/arm/virt.c                    |   2 +-
>>  target/arm/cpu.c                 |  18 ++---
>>  target/arm/cpu.h                 |   1 +
>>  target/arm/cpu64.c               | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  target/arm/internals.h           |   1 +
>>  target/arm/kvm64.c               |   5 ++
>>  target/arm/kvm_arm.h             |  12 +++
>>  target/arm/monitor.c             |   1 +
>>  9 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst b/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
>> index 00c444042ff5..e278650c837e 100644
>> --- a/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
>> +++ b/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
>> @@ -443,3 +443,24 @@ As with ``sve-default-vector-length``, if the default length is larger
>>  than the maximum vector length enabled, the actual vector length will
>>  be reduced.  If this property is set to ``-1`` then the default vector
>>  length is set to the maximum possible length.
>> +
>> +MTE CPU Property
>> +================
>> +
>> +The ``mte`` property controls the Memory Tagging Extension. For TCG, it requires
>> +presence of tag memory (which can be turned on for the ``virt`` machine via
>> +``mte=on``). For KVM, it requires the ``KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE`` capability; until
>> +proper migration support is implemented, enabling MTE will install a migration
>> +blocker.
>> +
>> +If not specified explicitly via ``on`` or ``off``, MTE will be available
>> +according to the following rules:
>> +
>> +* When TCG is used, MTE will be available iff tag memory is available; i.e. it
>> +  preserves the behaviour prior to introduction of the feature.
>> +
>> +* When KVM is used, MTE will default to off, so that migration will not
>> +  unintentionally be blocked.
>> +
>> +* Other accelerators currently don't support MTE.
>
> Minor nits for the documentation:
> we should expand out "if and only if" -- not everybody recognizes
> "iff", especially if they're not native English speakers or not
> mathematicians.

Ok, will change that.

>
> Should we write specifically that in a future QEMU version KVM
> might change to defaulting to "on if available" when migration
> support is implemented?

I can certainly add "Future QEMU versions might change that behaviour."
We should be able to add compat handling for that.

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] arm/kvm: add support for MTE

[Richard Henderson]

On 1/11/23 06:13, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> @@ -2136,7 +2136,7 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
>   
>       if (vms->mte && (kvm_enabled() || hvf_enabled())) {
>           error_report("mach-virt: %s does not support providing "
> -                     "MTE to the guest CPU",
> +                     "emulated MTE to the guest CPU",
>                        kvm_enabled() ? "KVM" : "HVF");

Not your bug, but noticing this should use current_accel_name().

> +static inline bool arm_machine_has_tag_memory(void)
> +{
> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> +    Object *obj = object_dynamic_cast(qdev_get_machine(), TYPE_VIRT_MACHINE);
> +
> +    /* so far, only the virt machine has support for tag memory */
> +    if (obj) {
> +        VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(obj);
> +
> +        return vms->mte;
> +    }
> +#endif
> +    return false;
> +}

True for CONFIG_USER_ONLY, via page_get_target_data().
You should have seen check-tcg test failures...

> +void arm_cpu_mte_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
> +{
> +    bool enable_mte;
> +
> +    switch (cpu->prop_mte) {
> +    case ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF:
> +        enable_mte = false;
> +        break;
> +    case ON_OFF_AUTO_ON:
> +        if (!kvm_enabled()) {

tcg_enabled(), here and everywhere else you test for !kvm.

> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
> +        if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_mte_supported()) {

kvm_arm.h should get a stub inline returning false, so that the ifdef is removed.
See e.g. kvm_arm_sve_supported().

> +    default: /* AUTO */
> +        if (!kvm_enabled()) {

tcg_enabled.

> +    /* accelerator-specific enablement */
> +    if (kvm_enabled()) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
> +        if (kvm_vm_enable_cap(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE, 0)) {
> +            error_setg(errp, "Failed to enable KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE");

Ideally this ifdef could go away as well.

> +        } else {
> +            /* TODO: add proper migration support with MTE enabled */
> +            if (!mte_migration_blocker) {

Move the global variable here, as a local static?

I guess this check is to avoid adding one blocker per cpu?
I would guess the cap doesn't need enabling more than once either?


> +                error_setg(&mte_migration_blocker,
> +                           "Live migration disabled due to MTE enabled");
> +                if (migrate_add_blocker(mte_migration_blocker, NULL)) {

You pass NULL to the migrate_add_blocker errp argument...

> +                    error_setg(errp, "Failed to add MTE migration blocker");

... then make up your own generic reason for why it failed.
In this case it seems only related to another command-line option: --only-migratable.


Anyway, I wonder about hiding all of this in target/arm/kvm.c:

bool kvm_arm_enable_mte(Error *errp)
{
     static bool once = false;
     Error *blocker;

     if (once) {
         return;
     }
     once = true;

     if (kvm_vm_enable_cap(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE, 0)) {
         error_setg_errno(errp, "Failed to enable KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE");
         return false;
     }

     blocker = g_new0(Error);
     error_setg(blocker, "Live migration disabled....");
     return !migrate_add_blocker(blocker, errp);
}

with

static inline bool kvm_arm_enable_mte(Error *errp)
{
     g_assert_not_reached();
}

in the !CONFIG_KVM block in kvm_arm.h.

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] arm/kvm: add support for MTE

[Cornelia Huck]

On Tue, Jan 17 2023, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 1/11/23 06:13, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> @@ -2136,7 +2136,7 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
>>   
>>       if (vms->mte && (kvm_enabled() || hvf_enabled())) {
>>           error_report("mach-virt: %s does not support providing "
>> -                     "MTE to the guest CPU",
>> +                     "emulated MTE to the guest CPU",
>>                        kvm_enabled() ? "KVM" : "HVF");
>
> Not your bug, but noticing this should use current_accel_name().

I can fix it as I'm touching the code anyway.

(Hm... two more of these right above. Maybe better in a separate patch.)

>
>> +static inline bool arm_machine_has_tag_memory(void)
>> +{
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>> +    Object *obj = object_dynamic_cast(qdev_get_machine(), TYPE_VIRT_MACHINE);
>> +
>> +    /* so far, only the virt machine has support for tag memory */
>> +    if (obj) {
>> +        VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(obj);
>> +
>> +        return vms->mte;
>> +    }
>> +#endif
>> +    return false;
>> +}
>
> True for CONFIG_USER_ONLY, via page_get_target_data().
> You should have seen check-tcg test failures...

Weird, let me check my setup...

>
>> +void arm_cpu_mte_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
>> +{
>> +    bool enable_mte;
>> +
>> +    switch (cpu->prop_mte) {
>> +    case ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF:
>> +        enable_mte = false;
>> +        break;
>> +    case ON_OFF_AUTO_ON:
>> +        if (!kvm_enabled()) {
>
> tcg_enabled(), here and everywhere else you test for !kvm.
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
>> +        if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_mte_supported()) {
>
> kvm_arm.h should get a stub inline returning false, so that the ifdef is removed.
> See e.g. kvm_arm_sve_supported().

Oh, I actually did add it already...

>
>> +    default: /* AUTO */
>> +        if (!kvm_enabled()) {
>
> tcg_enabled.
>
>> +    /* accelerator-specific enablement */
>> +    if (kvm_enabled()) {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
>> +        if (kvm_vm_enable_cap(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE, 0)) {
>> +            error_setg(errp, "Failed to enable KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE");
>
> Ideally this ifdef could go away as well.
>
>> +        } else {
>> +            /* TODO: add proper migration support with MTE enabled */
>> +            if (!mte_migration_blocker) {
>
> Move the global variable here, as a local static?
>
> I guess this check is to avoid adding one blocker per cpu?
> I would guess the cap doesn't need enabling more than once either?

Indeed, it's a VM cap. (I only tested this on a single-cpu FVP setup.)

>
>
>> +                error_setg(&mte_migration_blocker,
>> +                           "Live migration disabled due to MTE enabled");
>> +                if (migrate_add_blocker(mte_migration_blocker, NULL)) {
>
> You pass NULL to the migrate_add_blocker errp argument...
>
>> +                    error_setg(errp, "Failed to add MTE migration blocker");
>
> ... then make up your own generic reason for why it failed.
> In this case it seems only related to another command-line option: --only-migratable.
>
>
> Anyway, I wonder about hiding all of this in target/arm/kvm.c:
>
> bool kvm_arm_enable_mte(Error *errp)
> {
>      static bool once = false;
>      Error *blocker;
>
>      if (once) {
>          return;
>      }
>      once = true;
>
>      if (kvm_vm_enable_cap(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE, 0)) {
>          error_setg_errno(errp, "Failed to enable KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE");
>          return false;
>      }
>
>      blocker = g_new0(Error);
>      error_setg(blocker, "Live migration disabled....");
>      return !migrate_add_blocker(blocker, errp);
> }
>
> with
>
> static inline bool kvm_arm_enable_mte(Error *errp)
> {
>      g_assert_not_reached();
> }
>
> in the !CONFIG_KVM block in kvm_arm.h.

Good suggestion, I'll give that one a try.

Thanks for the feedback!

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] arm/kvm: add support for MTE

[Eric Auger]

Hi Connie,
On 1/11/23 17:13, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> Introduce a new cpu feature flag to control MTE support. To preserve
> backwards compatibility for tcg, MTE will continue to be enabled as
> long as tag memory has been provided.
> 
> If MTE has been enabled, we need to disable migration, as we do not
this only applies to KVM acceleration
> yet have a way to migrate the tags as well. Therefore, MTE will stay
> off with KVM unless requested explicitly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> ---
>  docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst |  21 +++++
>  hw/arm/virt.c                    |   2 +-
>  target/arm/cpu.c                 |  18 ++---
>  target/arm/cpu.h                 |   1 +
>  target/arm/cpu64.c               | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  target/arm/internals.h           |   1 +
>  target/arm/kvm64.c               |   5 ++
>  target/arm/kvm_arm.h             |  12 +++
>  target/arm/monitor.c             |   1 +
>  9 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst b/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
> index 00c444042ff5..e278650c837e 100644
> --- a/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
> +++ b/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
> @@ -443,3 +443,24 @@ As with ``sve-default-vector-length``, if the default length is larger
>  than the maximum vector length enabled, the actual vector length will
>  be reduced.  If this property is set to ``-1`` then the default vector
>  length is set to the maximum possible length.
> +
> +MTE CPU Property
> +================
> +
> +The ``mte`` property controls the Memory Tagging Extension. For TCG, it requires
> +presence of tag memory (which can be turned on for the ``virt`` machine via
> +``mte=on``). For KVM, it requires the ``KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE`` capability; until
> +proper migration support is implemented, enabling MTE will install a migration
> +blocker.
maybe re-emphasize: when KVM is enabled
> +
> +If not specified explicitly via ``on`` or ``off``, MTE will be available
> +according to the following rules:
> +
> +* When TCG is used, MTE will be available iff tag memory is available; i.e. it
suggestion: is available at machine level
> +  preserves the behaviour prior to introduction of the feature.
s/prior to/prior to the ?
> +
> +* When KVM is used, MTE will default to off, so that migration will not
> +  unintentionally be blocked.
> +
> +* Other accelerators currently don't support MTE.
> +
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
> index ea2413a0bad7..42359e256ad0 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
> @@ -2136,7 +2136,7 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
>  
>      if (vms->mte && (kvm_enabled() || hvf_enabled())) {
>          error_report("mach-virt: %s does not support providing "
> -                     "MTE to the guest CPU",
> +                     "emulated MTE to the guest CPU",
each time I read this message I feel difficult to understand it. Why not
replacing by
"mach-virt does not support tag memory with %s acceleration" or
something alike?
>                       kvm_enabled() ? "KVM" : "HVF");
>          exit(1);
>      }
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
> index 5f63316dbf22..decab743d0d5 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
> @@ -1529,6 +1529,11 @@ void arm_cpu_finalize_features(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
>              error_propagate(errp, local_err);
>              return;
>          }
> +        arm_cpu_mte_finalize(cpu, &local_err);
> +        if (local_err != NULL) {
> +            error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> +            return;
> +        }
>      }
>  #endif
>  
> @@ -1605,7 +1610,7 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>          }
>          if (cpu->tag_memory) {
>              error_setg(errp,
> -                       "Cannot enable %s when guest CPUs has MTE enabled",
> +                       "Cannot enable %s when guest CPUs has tag memory enabled",
>                         current_accel_name());
>              return;
>          }
> @@ -1984,17 +1989,6 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>                                         ID_PFR1, VIRTUALIZATION, 0);
>      }
>  
> -#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> -    if (cpu->tag_memory == NULL && cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mte, cpu)) {
> -        /*
> -         * Disable the MTE feature bits if we do not have tag-memory
> -         * provided by the machine.
> -         */
> -        cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr1 =
> -            FIELD_DP64(cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr1, ID_AA64PFR1, MTE, 0);
> -    }
> -#endif
> -
>      if (tcg_enabled()) {
>          /*
>           * Don't report the Statistical Profiling Extension in the ID
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
> index bf2bce046d56..f1a9015a7ed7 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
> @@ -1038,6 +1038,7 @@ struct ArchCPU {
>      bool prop_pauth;
>      bool prop_pauth_impdef;
>      bool prop_lpa2;
> +    OnOffAuto prop_mte;
>  
>      /* DCZ blocksize, in log_2(words), ie low 4 bits of DCZID_EL0 */
>      uint32_t dcz_blocksize;
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c
> index 0e021960fb5b..3cf42ee05ca3 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu64.c
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,13 @@
>  #include "qapi/visitor.h"
>  #include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
>  #include "internals.h"
> +#include "migration/blocker.h"
> +#include "qapi/qapi-visit-common.h"
> +#include "hw/arm/virt.h"
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
> +static Error *mte_migration_blocker;
> +#endif
>  
>  static void aarch64_a35_initfn(Object *obj)
>  {
> @@ -1096,6 +1103,130 @@ static void aarch64_neoverse_n1_initfn(Object *obj)
>      cpu->isar.reset_pmcr_el0 = 0x410c3000;
>  }
>  
> +static void aarch64_cpu_get_mte(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
> +                                void *opaque, Error **errp)
> +{
> +    ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> +    OnOffAuto mte = cpu->prop_mte;
> +
> +    visit_type_OnOffAuto(v, name, &mte, errp);
> +}
> +
> +static void aarch64_cpu_set_mte(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
> +                                void *opaque, Error **errp)
> +{
> +    ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> +
> +    visit_type_OnOffAuto(v, name, &cpu->prop_mte, errp);
> +
nit: spare void line
> +}
> +
> +static void aarch64_add_mte_properties(Object *obj)
> +{
> +    /*
> +     * For tcg, "AUTO" means turn on mte if tag memory has been provided, and
> +     * turn it off (without error) if not.
> +     * For kvm, "AUTO" currently means mte off, as migration is not supported
> +     * yet.
> +     * For all others, "AUTO" means mte off.
> +     */
> +    object_property_add(obj, "mte", "OnOffAuto", aarch64_cpu_get_mte,
> +                        aarch64_cpu_set_mte, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool arm_machine_has_tag_memory(void)
> +{
> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> +    Object *obj = object_dynamic_cast(qdev_get_machine(), TYPE_VIRT_MACHINE);
> +
> +    /* so far, only the virt machine has support for tag memory */
> +    if (obj) {
> +        VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(obj);
> +
> +        return vms->mte;
> +    }
> +#endif
> +    return false;
> +}
> +
> +void arm_cpu_mte_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
> +{
> +    bool enable_mte;
> +
> +    switch (cpu->prop_mte) {
> +    case ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF:
> +        enable_mte = false;
> +        break;
> +    case ON_OFF_AUTO_ON:
> +        if (!kvm_enabled()) {
> +            if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mte, cpu)) {
> +                if (!arm_machine_has_tag_memory()) {
> +                    error_setg(errp, "mte=on requires tag memory");
> +                    return;
> +                }
> +            } else {
> +                error_setg(errp, "mte not provided");
mte not supported by this CPU type?
> +                return;
> +            }
> +        }
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
> +        if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_mte_supported()) {
as you have stubs for both, is the #ifdef needed?
> +            error_setg(errp, "mte not supported by kvm");
> +            return;
> +        }
> +#endif
> +        enable_mte = true;
> +        break;
> +    default: /* AUTO */
> +        if (!kvm_enabled()) {
> +            if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mte, cpu)) {
> +                /*
> +                 * Tie mte enablement to presence of tag memory, in order to
> +                 * preserve pre-existing behaviour.
> +                 */
> +                enable_mte = arm_machine_has_tag_memory();
> +            } else {
> +                enable_mte = false;
> +            }
> +            break;
> +        } else {
> +            /*
> +             * This cannot yet be
> +             * enable_mte = kvm_arm_mte_supported();
> +             * as we don't support migration yet.
> +             */
> +            enable_mte = false;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    if (!enable_mte) {
> +        /* Disable MTE feature bits. */
> +        cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr1 =
> +            FIELD_DP64(cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr1, ID_AA64PFR1, MTE, 0);
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* accelerator-specific enablement */
> +    if (kvm_enabled()) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
> +        if (kvm_vm_enable_cap(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE, 0)) {
> +            error_setg(errp, "Failed to enable KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE");
nit: return and remove the else?
> +        } else {
> +            /* TODO: add proper migration support with MTE enabled */
> +            if (!mte_migration_blocker) {
> +                error_setg(&mte_migration_blocker,
> +                           "Live migration disabled due to MTE enabled");
> +                if (migrate_add_blocker(mte_migration_blocker, NULL)) {
Can't you pass the erro directly to migrate_add_blocker. Also  in
arm_gicv3_its_kvm.c or virtio-gpu-pci, < 0 is checked. Maybe worth to
double check the rationale.
> +                    error_setg(errp, "Failed to add MTE migration blocker");
> +                    error_free(mte_migration_blocker);
> +                    mte_migration_blocker = NULL;
> +                }
> +            }
> +        }
> +#endif
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  static void aarch64_host_initfn(Object *obj)
>  {
>  #if defined(CONFIG_KVM)
> @@ -1104,6 +1235,7 @@ static void aarch64_host_initfn(Object *obj)
>      if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64)) {
>          aarch64_add_sve_properties(obj);
>          aarch64_add_pauth_properties(obj);
> +        aarch64_add_mte_properties(obj);
>      }
>  #elif defined(CONFIG_HVF)
>      ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> @@ -1300,6 +1432,7 @@ static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj)
>      object_property_add(obj, "sve-max-vq", "uint32", cpu_max_get_sve_max_vq,
>                          cpu_max_set_sve_max_vq, NULL, NULL);
>      qdev_property_add_static(DEVICE(obj), &arm_cpu_lpa2_property);
> +    aarch64_add_mte_properties(obj);
>  }
>  
>  static const ARMCPUInfo aarch64_cpus[] = {
> diff --git a/target/arm/internals.h b/target/arm/internals.h
> index d9555309df0f..4dc6d19be42b 100644
> --- a/target/arm/internals.h
> +++ b/target/arm/internals.h
> @@ -1348,6 +1348,7 @@ void arm_cpu_sve_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
>  void arm_cpu_sme_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
>  void arm_cpu_pauth_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
>  void arm_cpu_lpa2_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
> +void arm_cpu_mte_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> diff --git a/target/arm/kvm64.c b/target/arm/kvm64.c
> index 1197253d12f7..b777bd0a11d2 100644
> --- a/target/arm/kvm64.c
> +++ b/target/arm/kvm64.c
> @@ -764,6 +764,11 @@ bool kvm_arm_steal_time_supported(void)
>      return kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_STEAL_TIME);
>  }
>  
> +bool kvm_arm_mte_supported(void)
> +{
> +    return kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE);
> +}
> +
>  QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(KVM_ARM64_SVE_VQ_MIN != 1);
>  
>  uint32_t kvm_arm_sve_get_vls(CPUState *cs)
> diff --git a/target/arm/kvm_arm.h b/target/arm/kvm_arm.h
> index 99017b635ce4..762443f8a7c0 100644
> --- a/target/arm/kvm_arm.h
> +++ b/target/arm/kvm_arm.h
> @@ -305,6 +305,13 @@ bool kvm_arm_pmu_supported(void);
>   */
>  bool kvm_arm_sve_supported(void);
>  
> +/**
> + * kvm_arm_mte_supported:
> + *
> + * Returns: true if KVM can enable MTE, and false otherwise.
> + */
> +bool kvm_arm_mte_supported(void);
> +
>  /**
>   * kvm_arm_get_max_vm_ipa_size:
>   * @ms: Machine state handle
> @@ -395,6 +402,11 @@ static inline bool kvm_arm_steal_time_supported(void)
>      return false;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool kvm_arm_mte_supported(void)
> +{
> +    return false;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * These functions should never actually be called without KVM support.
>   */
> diff --git a/target/arm/monitor.c b/target/arm/monitor.c
> index ecdd5ee81742..c419c81612ed 100644
> --- a/target/arm/monitor.c
> +++ b/target/arm/monitor.c
> @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ static const char *cpu_model_advertised_features[] = {
>      "sve1408", "sve1536", "sve1664", "sve1792", "sve1920", "sve2048",
>      "kvm-no-adjvtime", "kvm-steal-time",
>      "pauth", "pauth-impdef",
> +    "mte",
>      NULL
>  };
>  
Thanks

Eric

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] arm/kvm: add support for MTE

[Cornelia Huck]

On Mon, Jan 23 2023, Eric Auger <eauger@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Connie,
> On 1/11/23 17:13, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> Introduce a new cpu feature flag to control MTE support. To preserve
>> backwards compatibility for tcg, MTE will continue to be enabled as
>> long as tag memory has been provided.
>> 
>> If MTE has been enabled, we need to disable migration, as we do not
> this only applies to KVM acceleration

"If MTE has been enabled with KVM," ...

>> yet have a way to migrate the tags as well. Therefore, MTE will stay
>> off with KVM unless requested explicitly.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst |  21 +++++
>>  hw/arm/virt.c                    |   2 +-
>>  target/arm/cpu.c                 |  18 ++---
>>  target/arm/cpu.h                 |   1 +
>>  target/arm/cpu64.c               | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  target/arm/internals.h           |   1 +
>>  target/arm/kvm64.c               |   5 ++
>>  target/arm/kvm_arm.h             |  12 +++
>>  target/arm/monitor.c             |   1 +
>>  9 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst b/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
>> index 00c444042ff5..e278650c837e 100644
>> --- a/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
>> +++ b/docs/system/arm/cpu-features.rst
>> @@ -443,3 +443,24 @@ As with ``sve-default-vector-length``, if the default length is larger
>>  than the maximum vector length enabled, the actual vector length will
>>  be reduced.  If this property is set to ``-1`` then the default vector
>>  length is set to the maximum possible length.
>> +
>> +MTE CPU Property
>> +================
>> +
>> +The ``mte`` property controls the Memory Tagging Extension. For TCG, it requires
>> +presence of tag memory (which can be turned on for the ``virt`` machine via
>> +``mte=on``). For KVM, it requires the ``KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE`` capability; until
>> +proper migration support is implemented, enabling MTE will install a migration
>> +blocker.
> maybe re-emphasize: when KVM is enabled

I think it's explicit enough, since it is in the "For KVM" phrase?

>> +
>> +If not specified explicitly via ``on`` or ``off``, MTE will be available
>> +according to the following rules:
>> +
>> +* When TCG is used, MTE will be available iff tag memory is available; i.e. it
> suggestion: is available at machine level

It's only configured at machine level, not sure if that clarifies
anything?

>> +  preserves the behaviour prior to introduction of the feature.
> s/prior to/prior to the ?

ok

>> +
>> +* When KVM is used, MTE will default to off, so that migration will not
>> +  unintentionally be blocked.
>> +
>> +* Other accelerators currently don't support MTE.
>> +
>> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
>> index ea2413a0bad7..42359e256ad0 100644
>> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
>> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
>> @@ -2136,7 +2136,7 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
>>  
>>      if (vms->mte && (kvm_enabled() || hvf_enabled())) {
>>          error_report("mach-virt: %s does not support providing "
>> -                     "MTE to the guest CPU",
>> +                     "emulated MTE to the guest CPU",
> each time I read this message I feel difficult to understand it. Why not
> replacing by
> "mach-virt does not support tag memory with %s acceleration" or
> something alike?

Hmm... well, it does not support tag memory with kvm/hvf, and the
consequence of this is that kvm/hvf cannot provide support for emulated
mte... what about

"mach-virt: tag memory not supported with %s, emulated MTE cannot be
provided to the guest CPU"

Might be a bit long, though.

>>                       kvm_enabled() ? "KVM" : "HVF");
>>          exit(1);
>>      }

(...)

>> +static void aarch64_cpu_set_mte(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
>> +                                void *opaque, Error **errp)
>> +{
>> +    ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
>> +
>> +    visit_type_OnOffAuto(v, name, &cpu->prop_mte, errp);
>> +
> nit: spare void line

will drop

>> +}
>> +
>> +static void aarch64_add_mte_properties(Object *obj)
>> +{
>> +    /*
>> +     * For tcg, "AUTO" means turn on mte if tag memory has been provided, and
>> +     * turn it off (without error) if not.
>> +     * For kvm, "AUTO" currently means mte off, as migration is not supported
>> +     * yet.
>> +     * For all others, "AUTO" means mte off.
>> +     */
>> +    object_property_add(obj, "mte", "OnOffAuto", aarch64_cpu_get_mte,
>> +                        aarch64_cpu_set_mte, NULL, NULL);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline bool arm_machine_has_tag_memory(void)
>> +{
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>> +    Object *obj = object_dynamic_cast(qdev_get_machine(), TYPE_VIRT_MACHINE);
>> +
>> +    /* so far, only the virt machine has support for tag memory */
>> +    if (obj) {
>> +        VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(obj);
>> +
>> +        return vms->mte;
>> +    }
>> +#endif
>> +    return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void arm_cpu_mte_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
>> +{
>> +    bool enable_mte;
>> +
>> +    switch (cpu->prop_mte) {
>> +    case ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF:
>> +        enable_mte = false;
>> +        break;
>> +    case ON_OFF_AUTO_ON:
>> +        if (!kvm_enabled()) {
>> +            if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mte, cpu)) {
>> +                if (!arm_machine_has_tag_memory()) {
>> +                    error_setg(errp, "mte=on requires tag memory");
>> +                    return;
>> +                }
>> +            } else {
>> +                error_setg(errp, "mte not provided");
> mte not supported by this CPU type?

yes, probably better

>> +                return;
>> +            }
>> +        }
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
>> +        if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_mte_supported()) {
> as you have stubs for both, is the #ifdef needed?

see prior discussion :) Doesn't look like it.

>> +            error_setg(errp, "mte not supported by kvm");
>> +            return;
>> +        }
>> +#endif
>> +        enable_mte = true;
>> +        break;
>> +    default: /* AUTO */
>> +        if (!kvm_enabled()) {
>> +            if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mte, cpu)) {
>> +                /*
>> +                 * Tie mte enablement to presence of tag memory, in order to
>> +                 * preserve pre-existing behaviour.
>> +                 */
>> +                enable_mte = arm_machine_has_tag_memory();
>> +            } else {
>> +                enable_mte = false;
>> +            }
>> +            break;
>> +        } else {
>> +            /*
>> +             * This cannot yet be
>> +             * enable_mte = kvm_arm_mte_supported();
>> +             * as we don't support migration yet.
>> +             */
>> +            enable_mte = false;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (!enable_mte) {
>> +        /* Disable MTE feature bits. */
>> +        cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr1 =
>> +            FIELD_DP64(cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr1, ID_AA64PFR1, MTE, 0);
>> +        return;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    /* accelerator-specific enablement */
>> +    if (kvm_enabled()) {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
>> +        if (kvm_vm_enable_cap(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE, 0)) {
>> +            error_setg(errp, "Failed to enable KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE");
> nit: return and remove the else?

I've reworked that anyway (no need to enable a vm cap for every cpu.)

>> +        } else {
>> +            /* TODO: add proper migration support with MTE enabled */
>> +            if (!mte_migration_blocker) {
>> +                error_setg(&mte_migration_blocker,
>> +                           "Live migration disabled due to MTE enabled");
>> +                if (migrate_add_blocker(mte_migration_blocker, NULL)) {
> Can't you pass the erro directly to migrate_add_blocker. Also  in
> arm_gicv3_its_kvm.c or virtio-gpu-pci, < 0 is checked. Maybe worth to
> double check the rationale.

I've rewritten that in the meanwhile as well :)

>> +                    error_setg(errp, "Failed to add MTE migration blocker");
>> +                    error_free(mte_migration_blocker);
>> +                    mte_migration_blocker = NULL;
>> +                }
>> +            }
>> +        }
>> +#endif
>> +    }
>> +}

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] arm/kvm: add support for MTE

[Cornelia Huck]

On Thu, Jan 26 2023, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 23 2023, Eric Auger <eauger@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Connie,
>> On 1/11/23 17:13, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>>      if (vms->mte && (kvm_enabled() || hvf_enabled())) {
>>>          error_report("mach-virt: %s does not support providing "
>>> -                     "MTE to the guest CPU",
>>> +                     "emulated MTE to the guest CPU",
>> each time I read this message I feel difficult to understand it. Why not
>> replacing by
>> "mach-virt does not support tag memory with %s acceleration" or
>> something alike?
>
> Hmm... well, it does not support tag memory with kvm/hvf, and the
> consequence of this is that kvm/hvf cannot provide support for emulated
> mte... what about
>
> "mach-virt: tag memory not supported with %s, emulated MTE cannot be
> provided to the guest CPU"
>
> Might be a bit long, though.

"mach-virt: %s does not support providing emulated MTE to the guest CPU
(tag memory not supported)" seems to align better with the other error
messages in that function.


>
>>>                       kvm_enabled() ? "KVM" : "HVF");
>>>          exit(1);
>>>      }

[PATCH v4 2/2] qtests/arm: add some mte tests

[Cornelia Huck]

Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
---
 tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c b/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c
index 5a145273860c..e264d2178a8b 100644
--- a/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c
+++ b/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 
 #define MACHINE     "-machine virt,gic-version=max -accel tcg "
 #define MACHINE_KVM "-machine virt,gic-version=max -accel kvm -accel tcg "
+#define MACHINE_MTE "-machine virt,gic-version=max,mte=on -accel tcg "
 #define QUERY_HEAD  "{ 'execute': 'query-cpu-model-expansion', " \
                     "  'arguments': { 'type': 'full', "
 #define QUERY_TAIL  "}}"
@@ -155,6 +156,18 @@ static bool resp_get_feature(QDict *resp, const char *feature)
     g_assert(qdict_get_bool(_props, feature) == (expected_value));     \
 })
 
+#define resp_assert_feature_str(resp, feature, expected_value)         \
+({                                                                     \
+    QDict *_props;                                                     \
+                                                                       \
+    g_assert(_resp);                                                   \
+    g_assert(resp_has_props(_resp));                                   \
+    _props = resp_get_props(_resp);                                    \
+    g_assert(qdict_get(_props, feature));                              \
+    g_assert_cmpstr(qdict_get_try_str(_props, feature), ==,            \
+                    expected_value);                                   \
+})
+
 #define assert_feature(qts, cpu_type, feature, expected_value)         \
 ({                                                                     \
     QDict *_resp;                                                      \
@@ -165,6 +178,16 @@ static bool resp_get_feature(QDict *resp, const char *feature)
     qobject_unref(_resp);                                              \
 })
 
+#define assert_feature_str(qts, cpu_type, feature, expected_value)     \
+({                                                                     \
+    QDict *_resp;                                                      \
+                                                                       \
+    _resp = do_query_no_props(qts, cpu_type);                          \
+    g_assert(_resp);                                                   \
+    resp_assert_feature_str(_resp, feature, expected_value);           \
+    qobject_unref(_resp);                                              \
+})
+
 #define assert_set_feature(qts, cpu_type, feature, value)              \
 ({                                                                     \
     const char *_fmt = (value) ? "{ %s: true }" : "{ %s: false }";     \
@@ -176,6 +199,16 @@ static bool resp_get_feature(QDict *resp, const char *feature)
     qobject_unref(_resp);                                              \
 })
 
+#define assert_set_feature_str(qts, cpu_type, feature, value, _fmt)    \
+({                                                                     \
+    QDict *_resp;                                                      \
+                                                                       \
+    _resp = do_query(qts, cpu_type, _fmt, feature);                    \
+    g_assert(_resp);                                                   \
+    resp_assert_feature_str(_resp, feature, value);                    \
+    qobject_unref(_resp);                                              \
+})
+
 #define assert_has_feature_enabled(qts, cpu_type, feature)             \
     assert_feature(qts, cpu_type, feature, true)
 
@@ -412,6 +445,24 @@ static void sve_tests_sve_off_kvm(const void *data)
     qtest_quit(qts);
 }
 
+static void mte_tests_tag_memory_on(const void *data)
+{
+    QTestState *qts;
+
+    qts = qtest_init(MACHINE_MTE "-cpu max");
+
+    /*
+     * With tag memory, "mte" should default to on, and explicitly specifying
+     * either on or off should be fine.
+     */
+    assert_has_feature(qts, "max", "mte");
+
+    assert_set_feature_str(qts, "max", "mte", "off", "{ 'mte': 'off' }");
+    assert_set_feature_str(qts, "max", "mte", "on", "{ 'mte': 'on' }");
+
+    qtest_quit(qts);
+}
+
 static void pauth_tests_default(QTestState *qts, const char *cpu_type)
 {
     assert_has_feature_enabled(qts, cpu_type, "pauth");
@@ -424,6 +475,21 @@ static void pauth_tests_default(QTestState *qts, const char *cpu_type)
                  "{ 'pauth': false, 'pauth-impdef': true }");
 }
 
+static void mte_tests_default(QTestState *qts, const char *cpu_type)
+{
+    assert_has_feature(qts, cpu_type, "mte");
+
+    /*
+     * Without tag memory, mte will be off under tcg.
+     * Explicitly enabling it yields an error.
+     */
+    assert_has_feature(qts, cpu_type, "mte");
+
+    assert_set_feature_str(qts, "max", "mte", "off", "{ 'mte': 'off' }");
+    assert_error(qts, cpu_type, "mte=on requires tag memory",
+                 "{ 'mte': 'on' }");
+}
+
 static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion(const void *data)
 {
     QTestState *qts;
@@ -473,6 +539,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion(const void *data)
 
         sve_tests_default(qts, "max");
         pauth_tests_default(qts, "max");
+        mte_tests_default(qts, "max");
 
         /* Test that features that depend on KVM generate errors without. */
         assert_error(qts, "max",
@@ -516,6 +583,13 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void *data)
         assert_set_feature(qts, "host", "pmu", false);
         assert_set_feature(qts, "host", "pmu", true);
 
+        /*
+         * Unfortunately, there's no easy way to test whether this instance
+         * of KVM supports MTE. So we can only assert that the feature
+         * is present, but not whether it can be toggled.
+         */
+        assert_has_feature(qts, "host", "mte");
+
         /*
          * Some features would be enabled by default, but they're disabled
          * because this instance of KVM doesn't support them. Test that the
@@ -630,6 +704,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
                             NULL, sve_tests_sve_off);
         qtest_add_data_func("/arm/kvm/query-cpu-model-expansion/sve-off",
                             NULL, sve_tests_sve_off_kvm);
+        qtest_add_data_func("/arm/max/query-cpu-model-expansion/tag-memory",
+                            NULL, mte_tests_tag_memory_on);
     }
 
     return g_test_run();
-- 
2.39.0

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] qtests/arm: add some mte tests

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé]

On 11/1/23 17:13, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> ---
>   tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] qtests/arm: add some mte tests

[Eric Auger]

Hi Connie,
On 1/11/23 17:13, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Maybe add some extra information about what tests are run. Also you
could add an example of test invocation so that any people interested in
can easily run those new tests?

> ---
>  tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c b/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c
> index 5a145273860c..e264d2178a8b 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>  
>  #define MACHINE     "-machine virt,gic-version=max -accel tcg "
>  #define MACHINE_KVM "-machine virt,gic-version=max -accel kvm -accel tcg "
> +#define MACHINE_MTE "-machine virt,gic-version=max,mte=on -accel tcg "
>  #define QUERY_HEAD  "{ 'execute': 'query-cpu-model-expansion', " \
>                      "  'arguments': { 'type': 'full', "
>  #define QUERY_TAIL  "}}"
> @@ -155,6 +156,18 @@ static bool resp_get_feature(QDict *resp, const char *feature)
>      g_assert(qdict_get_bool(_props, feature) == (expected_value));     \
>  })
>  
> +#define resp_assert_feature_str(resp, feature, expected_value)         \
> +({                                                                     \
> +    QDict *_props;                                                     \
> +                                                                       \
> +    g_assert(_resp);                                                   \
> +    g_assert(resp_has_props(_resp));                                   \
> +    _props = resp_get_props(_resp);                                    \
> +    g_assert(qdict_get(_props, feature));                              \
> +    g_assert_cmpstr(qdict_get_try_str(_props, feature), ==,            \
> +                    expected_value);                                   \
> +})
> +
>  #define assert_feature(qts, cpu_type, feature, expected_value)         \
>  ({                                                                     \
>      QDict *_resp;                                                      \
> @@ -165,6 +178,16 @@ static bool resp_get_feature(QDict *resp, const char *feature)
>      qobject_unref(_resp);                                              \
>  })
>  
> +#define assert_feature_str(qts, cpu_type, feature, expected_value)     \
> +({                                                                     \
> +    QDict *_resp;                                                      \
> +                                                                       \
> +    _resp = do_query_no_props(qts, cpu_type);                          \
> +    g_assert(_resp);                                                   \
> +    resp_assert_feature_str(_resp, feature, expected_value);           \
> +    qobject_unref(_resp);                                              \
> +})
> +
>  #define assert_set_feature(qts, cpu_type, feature, value)              \
>  ({                                                                     \
>      const char *_fmt = (value) ? "{ %s: true }" : "{ %s: false }";     \
> @@ -176,6 +199,16 @@ static bool resp_get_feature(QDict *resp, const char *feature)
>      qobject_unref(_resp);                                              \
>  })
>  
> +#define assert_set_feature_str(qts, cpu_type, feature, value, _fmt)    \
> +({                                                                     \
> +    QDict *_resp;                                                      \
> +                                                                       \
> +    _resp = do_query(qts, cpu_type, _fmt, feature);                    \
> +    g_assert(_resp);                                                   \
> +    resp_assert_feature_str(_resp, feature, value);                    \
> +    qobject_unref(_resp);                                              \
> +})
> +
>  #define assert_has_feature_enabled(qts, cpu_type, feature)             \
>      assert_feature(qts, cpu_type, feature, true)
>  
> @@ -412,6 +445,24 @@ static void sve_tests_sve_off_kvm(const void *data)
>      qtest_quit(qts);
>  }
>  
> +static void mte_tests_tag_memory_on(const void *data)
> +{
> +    QTestState *qts;
> +
> +    qts = qtest_init(MACHINE_MTE "-cpu max");
> +
> +    /*
> +     * With tag memory, "mte" should default to on, and explicitly specifying
> +     * either on or off should be fine.
> +     */
> +    assert_has_feature(qts, "max", "mte");
> +
> +    assert_set_feature_str(qts, "max", "mte", "off", "{ 'mte': 'off' }");
> +    assert_set_feature_str(qts, "max", "mte", "on", "{ 'mte': 'on' }");
> +
> +    qtest_quit(qts);
> +}
> +
>  static void pauth_tests_default(QTestState *qts, const char *cpu_type)
>  {
>      assert_has_feature_enabled(qts, cpu_type, "pauth");
> @@ -424,6 +475,21 @@ static void pauth_tests_default(QTestState *qts, const char *cpu_type)
>                   "{ 'pauth': false, 'pauth-impdef': true }");
>  }
>  
> +static void mte_tests_default(QTestState *qts, const char *cpu_type)
> +{
> +    assert_has_feature(qts, cpu_type, "mte");
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Without tag memory, mte will be off under tcg.
> +     * Explicitly enabling it yields an error.
> +     */
> +    assert_has_feature(qts, cpu_type, "mte");
called twice
> +
> +    assert_set_feature_str(qts, "max", "mte", "off", "{ 'mte': 'off' }");
> +    assert_error(qts, cpu_type, "mte=on requires tag memory",
> +                 "{ 'mte': 'on' }");
nit. with pauth_tests_default form: cannot enable mte without tag memory
> +}
> +
>  static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion(const void *data)
>  {
>      QTestState *qts;
> @@ -473,6 +539,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion(const void *data)
>  
>          sve_tests_default(qts, "max");
>          pauth_tests_default(qts, "max");
> +        mte_tests_default(qts, "max");
>  
>          /* Test that features that depend on KVM generate errors without. */
>          assert_error(qts, "max",
> @@ -516,6 +583,13 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void *data)
>          assert_set_feature(qts, "host", "pmu", false);
>          assert_set_feature(qts, "host", "pmu", true);
>  
> +        /*
> +         * Unfortunately, there's no easy way to test whether this instance
> +         * of KVM supports MTE. So we can only assert that the feature
> +         * is present, but not whether it can be toggled.
> +         */
> +        assert_has_feature(qts, "host", "mte");
why isn't it possible to implement something like
        kvm_supports_steal_time = resp_get_feature(resp, "kvm-steal-time");
Could you elaborate?

> +
>          /*
>           * Some features would be enabled by default, but they're disabled
>           * because this instance of KVM doesn't support them. Test that the
> @@ -630,6 +704,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>                              NULL, sve_tests_sve_off);
>          qtest_add_data_func("/arm/kvm/query-cpu-model-expansion/sve-off",
>                              NULL, sve_tests_sve_off_kvm);
> +        qtest_add_data_func("/arm/max/query-cpu-model-expansion/tag-memory",
> +                            NULL, mte_tests_tag_memory_on);
>      }
>  
>      return g_test_run();
Thanks

Eric

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] qtests/arm: add some mte tests

[Cornelia Huck]

On Mon, Jan 23 2023, Eric Auger <eauger@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Connie,
> On 1/11/23 17:13, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> Maybe add some extra information about what tests are run. Also you
> could add an example of test invocation so that any people interested in
> can easily run those new tests?

Hm, it's just a part of the normal, standard qtests -- not sure what I
should add there?

>
>> ---
>>  tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)

(...)

>> +static void mte_tests_default(QTestState *qts, const char *cpu_type)
>> +{
>> +    assert_has_feature(qts, cpu_type, "mte");
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * Without tag memory, mte will be off under tcg.
>> +     * Explicitly enabling it yields an error.
>> +     */
>> +    assert_has_feature(qts, cpu_type, "mte");
> called twice

Ok, that's probably some kind of rebase artifact.

>> +
>> +    assert_set_feature_str(qts, "max", "mte", "off", "{ 'mte': 'off' }");
>> +    assert_error(qts, cpu_type, "mte=on requires tag memory",
>> +                 "{ 'mte': 'on' }");
> nit. with pauth_tests_default form: cannot enable mte without tag memory

Not sure what you mean here?

>> +}
>> +
>>  static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion(const void *data)
>>  {
>>      QTestState *qts;
>> @@ -473,6 +539,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion(const void *data)
>>  
>>          sve_tests_default(qts, "max");
>>          pauth_tests_default(qts, "max");
>> +        mte_tests_default(qts, "max");
>>  
>>          /* Test that features that depend on KVM generate errors without. */
>>          assert_error(qts, "max",
>> @@ -516,6 +583,13 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void *data)
>>          assert_set_feature(qts, "host", "pmu", false);
>>          assert_set_feature(qts, "host", "pmu", true);
>>  
>> +        /*
>> +         * Unfortunately, there's no easy way to test whether this instance
>> +         * of KVM supports MTE. So we can only assert that the feature
>> +         * is present, but not whether it can be toggled.
>> +         */
>> +        assert_has_feature(qts, "host", "mte");
> why isn't it possible to implement something like
>         kvm_supports_steal_time = resp_get_feature(resp, "kvm-steal-time");
> Could you elaborate?

I really should have written that down in detail, but I _think_ that's
because of OnOffAuto... if the prop is not set explicitly, we don't know
what is supported. Unless someone has an idea how to work around that?