From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AE47C004D4 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 20:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pIbHG-0001GE-9s; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 15:12:50 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pIbHE-0001Fm-LG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 15:12:48 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pIbHC-0003gw-Ak for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 15:12:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1674159164; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RB1HoZWFdxBmsbPS/jfORKHF0nuZ+TFQkgGiFgVXw5g=; b=CS9wlXVzV6M52ViJMkVPZ4vA/+66KaLQ+1mF6+Bi+v9Cl5bibps+GIWdfzZOM5iOhGQ/4T xwipUWYPbTaJ+estNzxZbDfotQV43uNiHBi5Ygeu0kFr1slhNR4FWPDIwFcabJRiQgbFRw TMumgGjWwgXLH8rbcgv1kjwPoS5RNKE= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-635-JOLyOpVgPHOC2XFq0aCZ4g-1; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 15:12:41 -0500 X-MC-Unique: JOLyOpVgPHOC2XFq0aCZ4g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B8748533DB; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 20:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.39.194.126]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F13E492B03; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 20:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 21:12:38 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf To: Hanna Reitz Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Eric Blake , Markus Armbruster Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] qemu-img info: Show protocol-level information Message-ID: References: <20220620162704.80987-1-hreitz@redhat.com> <7c2c9623-c865-91a3-01b7-0e7f90fde278@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <7c2c9623-c865-91a3-01b7-0e7f90fde278@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.10 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=kwolf@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Am 08.12.2022 um 13:24 hat Hanna Reitz geschrieben: > On 20.06.22 18:26, Hanna Reitz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This series is a v2 to: > > > > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2022-05/msg00042.html > > Ping, it looks like this still applies (to the master branch and kevin’s > block-next branch at least). Not any more. :-) But the conflicts seemed obvious enough, so I rebased it (including changing the "Since: 7.1" occurrences to 8.0) and applied it to my block branch. Thanks! Kevin