qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>, "John Snow" <jsnow@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: no more pullreq processing til February
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 14:35:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9KPuOT3NEAjN740@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pmb1pfas.fsf@linaro.org>

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 01:57:02PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
> 
> Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> 
> > Hi; we've run out of gitlab CI pipeline minutes for this month.
> > This leaves us the choice of:
> >  (a) don't process any more pullreqs til we get more minutes in Feb
> >  (b) merge pullreqs blindly without CI testing
> >  (c) buy more minutes
> >
> > For the moment I propose to take option (a). My mail filter will
> > continue to track pullreqs that get sent to the list, but I won't
> > do anything with them.
> >
> > If anybody has a better suggestion feel free :-)
> 
> I've submitted a support request (#366644) to GitLab to see if they will
> give us more minutes for this month. Longer term ideas:
> 
>  * Reduce compile time by reducing number of identical object files we
>    build for specific_ss
>  * Move more tests over to custom runners (don't we have an x86 box
>    somewhere?)

NB, we don't want to sacrifice coverage for contributors fork CI.

The current private runners don't do that because they're testing
scenarios that were already impossible with shared runners.

>  * Carry out an audit of code coverage for different test sets and
>    rationalise our CI set

I'm confident we can rationalize our jobs, especially the cross
compilation ones.

For each non-x86 arch we've got two sets of jobs, one for system
emulators and one for user emulators.

IMHO the most interesting part of non-x86 testing is the TCG
host target. We don't need 2 jobs to cover that, either system
or user emulators would cover TCG build / test. Most of the rest
of code is not heavily host arch dependant.

So for cross compilation we could limit ourselves to

  - 1 job per TCG host target 
  - Some full coverage job(s) for a big endian arch
  - Some full coverage job(s) for a 32-bit arch

I expect that could eliminate quite a few cross arch jobs.


With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-26 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-26 13:22 no more pullreq processing til February Peter Maydell
2023-01-26 13:52 ` Eldon Stegall
2023-01-26 14:13   ` Alex Bennée
2023-01-26 14:27     ` Peter Maydell
2023-01-26 14:38     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-26 18:41       ` Eldon Stegall
2023-01-27  9:53         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-26 14:18   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-26 14:30     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-27  8:50       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-26 13:57 ` Alex Bennée
2023-01-26 14:07   ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2023-01-26 14:27     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-26 14:35   ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2023-01-26 14:41     ` Peter Maydell
2023-01-26 18:17       ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-26 20:49         ` Alex Bennée
2023-01-26 14:25 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-01-26 14:28   ` Peter Maydell
2023-01-27  7:36     ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-27 12:39     ` Kevin Wolf
2023-01-27 12:47       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-27 13:11       ` Peter Maydell
2023-01-27 13:12         ` Peter Maydell
2023-02-01 16:18       ` Peter Maydell
2023-01-27  9:30 ` Markus Armbruster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y9KPuOT3NEAjN740@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).