From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, rjones@redhat.com,
kwolf@redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFC: towards systemd socket activation in q-s-d
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 16:45:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9f0FNvmYwaDzyn1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y9fa+Zm5VLNoDDo0@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 02:58:01PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > I'm at a point where I can take a shot at implementing this, but want
> > some feedback on whether it is better to try to shoehorn a generic
> > solution into the existing @fd member of the SocketAddressType union,
> > or whether it would be better to add yet another union member
> > @systemd-fd or some similar name to make it explicit when a command
> > line parameter wants to refer to an fd being passed through systemd
> > socket activation LISTEN_FDS and friends.
>
> I don't think we should change SocketAddress at all, just use the
> @fd member that already exists, by fixing its semantics to always
> take an alphanumeric FD name and deprecate the use of pure numeric
> FD numbers.
>
> Currently the socket code has an annoying structural connection
> to the monitor code, because the monitor is tracking the passed
> in FDs.
>
> It would be nice to separate this by introducing some dedicated
> APIs for handling named FDs. The monitor can feed named FDs into
> this from getfd, and the CLI can feed named FDS into this from
> activation. The socket code can then use these named FD handling
> APIs and thus isolate/detach itself from the monitor.
Some worked examples of what I would like to see being possible.
First the bare minimum, allowing a zero-conf setup (ok not possible
today, but lets assume QEMU can configure machine hardware entirely
via QMP):
$ cat /etc/system/system/myvm.service
[Unit]
Description=My VM
[Service]
Exec=/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64
$ cat /etc/system/system/myvm-qmp.socket
[Unit]
Description=My VM QMP
[Socket]
ListenStream=/var/run/myvm-qmp.socket
FileDescriptorName=qmp
So in this example, /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 would be started
with no args, and LISTEN_FDS=1 and LISTEN_FDNAMES=qmp. QEMU will
have declared that 'qmp' is a reserved activation name that results
in creation of a QMP chardev.
This would be functionally equivalent to the following more explicit
syntax, which avoids the reserved name:
$ cat /etc/system/system/myvm.service
[Unit]
Description=My VM
[Service]
Exec=/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -chardev socket,fd=control,id=qmp0 -qmp chardev=qmp0
$ cat /etc/system/system/myvm-qmp.socket
[Unit]
Description=My VM QMP
[Socket]
ListenStream=/var/run/myvm-qmp.socket
FileDescriptorName=control
which is LISTEN_FDS=1, LISTEN_FDNAMES=control
A more advanced usage would be to pass many FDs for different
tasks:
$ cat /etc/system/system/myvm.service
[Unit]
Description=My VM
[Service]
Exec=/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 \
-chardev socket,fd=control,id=qmp0 -qmp chardev=qmp0 \
-vnc fd=vnc-listen
$ cat /etc/system/system/myvm-qmp.socket
[Unit]
Description=My VM QMP
[Socket]
ListenStream=/var/run/myvm-qmp.socket
FileDescriptorName=control
$ cat /etc/system/system/myvm-vnc.socket
[Unit]
Description=My VM VNC
[Socket]
ListenStream=0.0.0.0:5901
FileDescriptorName=vnc
which is LISTEN_FDS=2, LISTEN_FDNAMES=control,vnc
This can apply to q-s-d too with the -export flag taking a FD name.
eg here we use the implicit QMP socket, and the explicit NBD exports:
$ cat /etc/system/system/mydisks.service
[Unit]
Description=My DISKS
[Service]
Exec=/usr/bin/qemu-storage-daemon \
-blockdev id=pubdisk,.... \
-blockdev id=privdisk,.... \
-export type=nbd,id=nbdpub,node-name=pubdisk,addr.type=fd,addr.fd=nbd-public
-export type=nbd,id=nbdpub,node-name=privdisk,addr.type=fd,addr.fd=nbd-private
$ cat /etc/system/system/mydisks-qmp.socket
[Unit]
Description=My disks QMP
[Socket]
ListenStream=/var/run/mydisks-qmp.socket
FileDescriptorName=qmp
$ cat /etc/system/system/mydisks-nbd-public.socket
[Unit]
Description=My disks Public
[Socket]
ListenStream=0.0.0.0:9000
FileDescriptorName=nbd-public
$ cat /etc/system/system/mydisks-nbd-private.socket
[Unit]
Description=My disks private
[Socket]
ListenStream=/var/run/mydisks-nbd-private.sock
FileDescriptorName=nbd-private
which is LISTEN_FDS=3, LISTEN_FDNAMES=qmp,nbd-public,nbd-private, giving
you a QMP server on a UNIX socket, a private disk on a NBD UNIX socket
and a public disk on a NBD TCP socket.
The above system units are overly simplified for illustration, real
world ones would have more such as SocketMode for unit sockets and
dependencies, etc
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-30 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-27 21:26 RFC: towards systemd socket activation in q-s-d Eric Blake
2023-01-28 7:49 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2023-01-30 14:58 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-30 15:44 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2023-01-30 15:51 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-30 16:45 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2023-01-30 16:55 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2023-01-31 11:17 ` Kevin Wolf
2023-01-31 11:29 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y9f0FNvmYwaDzyn1@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rjones@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).