From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
Qemu-block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
hreitz@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, quintela@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] gitlab-ci.d/buildtest: Disintegrate the build-coroutine-sigaltstack job
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 13:08:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9z5TohXERGuQ6TS@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc5dba59-4993-ee66-a94b-a550bdced396@redhat.com>
Am 03.02.2023 um 12:23 hat Thomas Huth geschrieben:
> On 30/01/2023 11.58, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:44:46AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > We can get rid of the build-coroutine-sigaltstack job by moving
> > > the configure flags that should be tested here to other jobs:
> > > Move --with-coroutine=sigaltstack to the build-without-defaults job
> > > and --enable-trace-backends=ftrace to the cross-s390x-kvm-only job.
> >
> > The biggest user of coroutines is the block layer. So we probably
> > ought to have coroutines aligned with a job that triggers the
> > 'make check-block' for iotests. IIUC, the without-defaults
> > job won't do that. How about, arbitrarily, using either the
> > 'check-system-debian' or 'check-system-ubuntu' job. Those distros
> > are closely related, so getting sigaltstack vs ucontext coverage
> > between them is a good win, and they both trigger the block jobs
> > IIUC.
>
> I gave it a try with the ubuntu job, but this apparently trips up the iotests:
>
> https://gitlab.com/thuth/qemu/-/jobs/3705965062#L212
>
> Does anybody have a clue what could be going wrong here?
I'm not sure how changing the coroutine backend could cause it, but
primarily this looks like an assertion failure in migration code.
Dave, Juan, any ideas what this assertion checks and why it could be
failing?
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-03 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-30 10:44 [PATCH 0/6] Shorten the runtime of some gitlab-CI shared runner jobs Thomas Huth
2023-01-30 10:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] gitlab-ci.d/buildtest: Remove ppc-softmmu from the clang-system job Thomas Huth
2023-01-30 22:37 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-01-30 10:44 ` [PATCH 2/6] gitlab-ci.d/buildtest: Remove aarch64-softmmu from the build-system-ubuntu job Thomas Huth
2023-01-30 10:44 ` [PATCH 3/6] tests/qtest/display-vga-test: Add proper checks if a device is available Thomas Huth
2023-01-30 21:13 ` Richard Henderson
2023-01-30 10:44 ` [PATCH 4/6] gitlab-ci.d/buildtest: Merge the --without-default-* jobs Thomas Huth
2023-01-30 13:28 ` Fabiano Rosas
2023-01-31 8:02 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-30 17:45 ` Alex Bennée
2023-01-30 22:43 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-01-30 10:44 ` [PATCH 5/6] gitlab-ci.d/buildtest: Merge the two gprof-gcov jobs Thomas Huth
2023-01-30 17:42 ` Alex Bennée
2023-01-31 7:53 ` Thomas Huth
2023-01-30 10:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] gitlab-ci.d/buildtest: Disintegrate the build-coroutine-sigaltstack job Thomas Huth
2023-01-30 10:58 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-01-30 12:05 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-03 11:23 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-03 12:08 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2023-02-03 15:44 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-03 15:47 ` Peter Maydell
2023-02-03 21:14 ` Juan Quintela
2023-02-04 10:23 ` Peter Maydell
2023-02-06 9:36 ` Juan Quintela
2023-02-06 7:44 ` Thomas Huth
2023-02-06 8:46 ` Juan Quintela
2023-02-06 10:47 ` Peter Maydell
2023-02-03 21:10 ` Juan Quintela
2023-02-02 11:30 ` [PATCH 0/6] Shorten the runtime of some gitlab-CI shared runner jobs Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y9z5TohXERGuQ6TS@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).