qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk>
To: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/block/nvme: drain namespaces on sq deletion
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:07:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YCUd7IT28icjAV07@apples.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210211024902.GA24885@localhost.localdomain>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3086 bytes --]

On Feb 11 11:49, Minwoo Im wrote:
> On 21-01-27 14:15:05, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> > From: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
> > 
> > For most commands, when issuing an AIO, the BlockAIOCB is stored in the
> > NvmeRequest aiocb pointer when the AIO is issued. The purpose of storing
> > this is to allow the AIO to be cancelled when deleting submission
> > queues (it is currently not used for Abort).
> > 
> > Since the addition of the Dataset Management command and Zoned
> > Namespaces, NvmeRequests may involve more than one AIO and the AIOs are
> > issued without saving a reference to the BlockAIOCB. This is a problem
> > since nvme_del_sq will attempt to cancel outstanding AIOs, potentially
> > with an invalid BlockAIOCB.
> > 
> > Fix this by instead of explicitly cancelling the requests, just allow
> > the AIOs to complete by draining the namespace blockdevs.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/block/nvme.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c
> > index 316858fd8adf..91f6fb6da1e2 100644
> > --- a/hw/block/nvme.c
> > +++ b/hw/block/nvme.c
> > @@ -403,6 +403,7 @@ static void nvme_req_clear(NvmeRequest *req)
> >  {
> >      req->ns = NULL;
> >      req->opaque = NULL;
> > +    req->aiocb = NULL;
> >      memset(&req->cqe, 0x0, sizeof(req->cqe));
> >      req->status = NVME_SUCCESS;
> >  }
> > @@ -2396,6 +2397,7 @@ static uint16_t nvme_del_sq(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeRequest *req)
> >      NvmeSQueue *sq;
> >      NvmeCQueue *cq;
> >      uint16_t qid = le16_to_cpu(c->qid);
> > +    int i;
> >  
> >      if (unlikely(!qid || nvme_check_sqid(n, qid))) {
> >          trace_pci_nvme_err_invalid_del_sq(qid);
> > @@ -2404,12 +2406,18 @@ static uint16_t nvme_del_sq(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeRequest *req)
> >  
> >      trace_pci_nvme_del_sq(qid);
> >  
> > -    sq = n->sq[qid];
> > -    while (!QTAILQ_EMPTY(&sq->out_req_list)) {
> > -        r = QTAILQ_FIRST(&sq->out_req_list);
> > -        assert(r->aiocb);
> > -        blk_aio_cancel(r->aiocb);
> > +    for (i = 1; i <= n->num_namespaces; i++) {
> > +        NvmeNamespace *ns = nvme_ns(n, i);
> > +        if (!ns) {
> > +            continue;
> > +        }
> > +
> > +        nvme_ns_drain(ns);
> 
> If we just drain the entire namespaces here, commands which has nothing
> to do with the target sq to be deleted will be drained.  And this might
> be a burden for a single SQ deletion.
> 

That is true. But how often would you dynamically delete and create I/O
submission queues in the fast path?

> By the way, agree with the multiple AIOs references problem for newly added
> commands.  But, shouldn't we manage the inflight AIO request references for
> the newlly added commands with some other way and kill them all
> explicitly as it was?  Maybe some of list for AIOCBs?

I was hesitant to add more stuff to NvmeRequest (like a QTAILQ to track
this). Getting a steady-state with draining was an easy fix.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-11 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-27 13:15 [PATCH] hw/block/nvme: drain namespaces on sq deletion Klaus Jensen
2021-02-10 20:58 ` Klaus Jensen
2021-02-11  2:49 ` Minwoo Im
2021-02-11 12:07   ` Klaus Jensen [this message]
2021-02-11 13:49     ` Minwoo Im
2021-02-11 15:32       ` Klaus Jensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YCUd7IT28icjAV07@apples.localdomain \
    --to=its@irrelevant.dk \
    --cc=k.jensen@samsung.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=minwoo.im.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).