From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Cc: elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com, john.g.johnson@oracle.com,
jag.raman@oracle.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] multi-process: Initialize variables declared with g_auto*
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 10:17:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YD9iTgCNgrsbzWfx@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210303070639.1430-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com>
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 03:06:39PM +0800, Zenghui Yu wrote:
> Quote docs/devel/style.rst (section "Automatic memory deallocation"):
>
> * Variables declared with g_auto* MUST always be initialized,
> otherwise the cleanup function will use uninitialized stack memory
>
> Initialize @name properly to get rid of the compilation error:
>
> ../hw/remote/proxy.c: In function 'pci_proxy_dev_realize':
> /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/glib-autocleanups.h:28:3: error: 'name' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> g_free (*pp);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../hw/remote/proxy.c:350:30: note: 'name' was declared here
> g_autofree char *name;
> ^~~~
This is a bit wierd. There should only be risk of uninitialized
variable if there is a 'return' or 'goto' statement between the
variable declaration and and initialization, which is not the
case in either scenario here.
What OS distro and compiler + version are you seeing this with ?
Also we seem to be lacking any gitlab CI job to test with the
multiprocess feature enabled
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-03 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-03 7:06 [PATCH] multi-process: Initialize variables declared with g_auto* Zenghui Yu
2021-03-03 8:44 ` Jag Raman
2021-03-03 10:08 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-03-03 10:17 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2021-03-03 10:26 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-03-03 14:24 ` Jag Raman
2021-03-03 14:26 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-03-03 14:28 ` Jag Raman
2021-03-04 2:12 ` Zenghui Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YD9iTgCNgrsbzWfx@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com \
--cc=jag.raman@oracle.com \
--cc=john.g.johnson@oracle.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).