From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: eric.auger@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-iommu: Default to bypass during boot
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:13:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YDfatCDUZ3FISPJI@myrica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210221064211-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 06:45:18AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 11:59:30AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > Currently the virtio-iommu device must be programmed before it allows
> > DMA from any PCI device. This can make the VM entirely unusable when a
> > virtio-iommu driver isn't present, for example in a bootloader that
> > loads the OS from storage.
> >
> > Similarly to the other vIOMMU implementations, default to DMA bypassing
> > the IOMMU during boot. Add a "boot-bypass" option that lets users change
> > this behavior.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
>
> wouldn't this be a spec violation?
>
>
> When the device is reset, endpoints are not attached to any domain.
>
> If the VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS feature is negotiated, all accesses from
> unattached endpoints are allowed and translated by the IOMMU using the
> identity function. If the feature is not negotiated, any memory access
> from an unattached endpoint fails. Upon attaching an endpoint in
> bypass mode to a new domain, any memory access from the endpoint fails,
> since the domain does not contain any mapping.
Right, but the device behavior regarding BYPASS is specified as:
If the driver does not accept the VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS feature, the
device SHOULD NOT let endpoints access the guest-physical address space.
So I figured that the spec could be read as "before feature negotiation
it's undefined whether the IOMMU is bypassed or not" and so a device
implementation can choose either (previously discussed at [1]). But it's a
stretch, we should clarify this.
Also, the OS might want to know whether DMA was bypassing the IOMMU before
the device is initialized. If there are strong security requirements, then
boot-bypass means the system was vulnerable to DMA attacks during boot.
So I'd like to add a new feature bit for this, VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BOOT_BYPASS,
that tells whether DMA bypasses the IOMMU before feature negotiation. It's
only an indicator, accepting the feature doesn't change anything. I'll
send the spec change shortly.
Thanks,
Jean
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20200109104032.GA937123@myrica/
> Maybe it's not too late to change the spec here - want to try sending
> a spec patch?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-25 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-18 10:59 [PATCH] virtio-iommu: Default to bypass during boot Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-02-21 11:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-25 17:13 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker [this message]
2021-02-26 8:11 ` Tian, Kevin
2021-02-26 13:00 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-03-04 7:59 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YDfatCDUZ3FISPJI@myrica \
--to=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).