From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D140C433B4 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 03:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 945DA61077 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 03:08:55 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 945DA61077 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gibson.dropbear.id.au Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:54902 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYKHO-0007an-Ex for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 23:08:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44580) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYKGN-0006qs-RA; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 23:07:51 -0400 Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:58043 helo=ozlabs.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYKGL-00051d-Sn; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 23:07:51 -0400 Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 4FNsFD2tT7z9vFg; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:07:44 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gibson.dropbear.id.au; s=201602; t=1618801664; bh=d+Xa0ZclWhI9lnfInhVHvRiV4xBLA9Ar1Y3wOC532rE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FTi+zYkM1rcS4RMs8Zx8eG75AptBsXi5WaZ86dA3/0aw0N6ZmN/d46dv6C9YJee/j Qoj+ULg3pwRaWoLXpdNltpl3Osh7UlNUFFW9NF1b6pk6H95ZLgeIaCehJuSxDoqrdN Gj65j8S9wx0E+4mATptu3USem7DQNBAzhIf+KJ7k= Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 11:14:30 +1000 From: David Gibson To: "Matheus K. Ferst" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] tests/tcg/ppc64le: paddi tests Message-ID: References: <20210415214138.563795-1-matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br> <338d679e-6619-4f60-5620-24de3ed3bf6d@eldorado.org.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RxAfEhJzqKi5IYqc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <338d679e-6619-4f60-5620-24de3ed3bf6d@eldorado.org.br> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=203.11.71.1; envelope-from=dgibson@ozlabs.org; helo=ozlabs.org X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: thuth@redhat.com, gustavo.romero@protonmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, wainersm@redhat.com, f4bug@amsat.org, luis.pires@eldorado.org.br, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" --RxAfEhJzqKi5IYqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:13:48AM -0300, Matheus K. Ferst wrote: > On 16/04/2021 00:52, David Gibson wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 06:41:35PM -0300, matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br= wrote: > > > From: Matheus Ferst > > >=20 > > > Based-on: <20210413211129.457272-1-luis.pires@eldorado.org.br> > >=20 > > First things first: it's unclear to me if this is testing stuff that's > > already merged, or it's speculative tests for the in-progress prefixed > > instruction stuff. i.e. If these tests are applied right now, will > > they pass? >=20 > GCC-10 images can be used to test already merged Power10 instructions, su= ch > as brh/brw/brd, but I haven't writen tests for them (yet?). Both tests are > targeting paddi, whose implementation is in-progress, so applying them now > will fail. Maybe I should split the series? Patch 1 for now, and Patch 2 = and > 3 when paddi are merged? That sounds reasonable, as long as patch 1 does *something* visible now (e.g. running existing tests with the new compiler). >=20 > > > This series adds gcc-10 based images to enable the build of tests wit= h Power10 > > > instructions. Then two tests for paddi are added: > > > - The first one checks a weird behavior observed on POWER10 Functiona= l Simulator > > > 1.1.0, where the 34-bit immediate is treated as a 32-bits one; > > > - The second one exercises the R=3D1 path of paddi, where CIA is used= instead of RA. > > > The test is failing with the current implementation because we use= cpu_nip, > > > which is not updated all the time. Luis already has the fix, it sh= ould be > > > applied on the next version of his patch series. > > >=20 > > > The main reason to submit this patch as an RFC first is the docker pa= rt. I would > > > lie if I tell you that I understand half of what is going on there. > > > - 'make docker-test-tcg' fails, but apparently on unrelated things; > > > - 'make docker-run-test-tcg@debian-ppc64el-cross' passes, but it lo= oks > > > like the test is skipped? > > > - 'make check-tcg' runs the test and passes (with the fix in place = for the > > > second). > >=20 > > What sort of host was that on? Unfortunately 'make check-tcg' has > > been broken on a POWER host for some time, and I've never had time to > > look into it. > >=20 >=20 > I'm testing on amd64, but I can also try on ppc64le. >=20 > > >=20 > > > Finally, get_maintainer.pl found no maintainers for > > > tests/tcg/ppc64{,le}/Makefile.target. Would it be Mr. Gibson? > >=20 > > Uh... sorta? I also don't know much about what's going on here, but > > I'm probably maintainer by default. > >=20 >=20 > So, should I update MAINTAINERS in this series? >=20 --=20 David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson --RxAfEhJzqKi5IYqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEdfRlhq5hpmzETofcbDjKyiDZs5IFAmB82XUACgkQbDjKyiDZ s5JEWA//e+aylgEZGA4akUdiCkR4xt3O0nbntbZGsghCknsHU9/OSOd16VaBanPI uGUSQAPiwxk6sSOKcUm8+nsX2A5H4urCW8rDIXwyd2hSMrq7yd6fcmZaKLHI4yzl t5XUEbjDbFAzHe9UTNcLNn5OxkgKeVsPzw1zPLXkC2N12af+cUOGlgqoJ0AMW68A pk4bCeEUtZNjbwtExGInysH6AI0LVkkF2MGowr2WDEJlPkY4srUgZlR9LJAgM5mu yTKBjQ3qM6447W+I0ZTPsqA0oxXU55dprp2gnXXx+UEpMH+BcmvPx1LNmNjd3KLU BCJzLP3i5e38hlax0tucQPFTmKm+pgjVOD8qH79Ywciq5u9UNGCrD5QDGqxxdS12 y4MIq25xDPPPyJfxpnxo1XmOsGRamhMTZdIubvSqqoMaShGodzG6Bt+s0tj0sY4i a6uEVkDrZ8jhjmwtRYDSiut26R+COisNfU6hh2bnKLwI/gfodm+cmzPHK8zPGqnp CpFYCC3mk+0d+AqiNg+zJe10phgEMQwRA/vOdVodHJ73kkoXB7huJ4kftcI+uo9p n/5Y3o9jRGsZt+1MCtPRKCPnmi3nO/3x8aINakz9oGWwBQ6ieeZIbfgtY9LQKCVZ V0swrGm2gptpcKOY0BXMD1TDiFbaCp3zDDd+JCXpwmz1oJsDk5g= =IPTA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RxAfEhJzqKi5IYqc--