From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B54C433ED for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 17:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FDB561352 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 17:09:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6FDB561352 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:56144 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgVt5-0001CK-9N for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 11 May 2021 13:09:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54414) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgVqf-0006Wo-UI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 May 2021 13:07:10 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:55597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgVqd-0002Et-Jo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 May 2021 13:07:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1620752826; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=Q1bdOlwx5w6qOb0+8lnjQXaCMA4l4608fe+L3Z66HhI=; b=X43KtCyMLrFdNsqQ2SPey/xhdoRMNDwT2uVoVIRxqCvjTnuQl9VIxkVaMr3SZme7bhl3S9 8ey8CD4QOne/y6Wofcm+BG25ynOMKMdjotaKF6DJOlyrkA4R1BDi3uPCwU5Wi0niTwREVB nqqoxlZfMzT7nvyeKwJSocri2J4HRpU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-165-k7HpVUejPk-s5n_RZQ-GGg-1; Tue, 11 May 2021 13:07:04 -0400 X-MC-Unique: k7HpVUejPk-s5n_RZQ-GGg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89F57801817; Tue, 11 May 2021 17:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-115-93.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.115.93]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67B5610016FC; Tue, 11 May 2021 17:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 18:06:59 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PULL 30/33] migration: do not restart VM after successful snapshot-load Message-ID: References: <20210511081350.419428-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20210511081350.419428-31-pbonzini@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210511081350.419428-31-pbonzini@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.6 (2021-03-06) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=berrange@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -34 X-Spam_score: -3.5 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.699, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-stable@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 04:13:47AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > The HMP loadvm code is calling load_snapshot rather than > qmp_snapshot_load, in order to bypass the job infrastructure. The code > around it is almost the same, with one difference: hmp_loadvm is > restarting the VM if load_snapshot fails, qmp_snapshot_load is doing so > if load_snapshot succeeds. > > Fix the bug in QMP by moving the common code to load_snapshot. This doesn't appear to have actually fixed the HMP regression. Instead I think it is duplicated the HMP bug in the QMP code too. See the 068 iotest enhancement here that validates the expected state on success: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-05/msg03091.html Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|