From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] i386: use better matching family/model/stepping for generic CPUs
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 17:43:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YK56rnSly772QAxl@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210507133650.645526-1-berrange@redhat.com>
ping
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 02:36:48PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> This is in response to this bug report:
>
> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/191
>
> The generic 'qemu64' and 'max' CPUs currently defined to report a
> family/model/stepping that approximately corresponds to an AMD K7
> vintage architecture. The K7 series predates the introduction of
> 64-bit support by AMD in the K8 series. This has been reported to
> lead to LLVM complaints about generating 64-bit code for a 32-bit
> CPU target
>
> LLVM ERROR: 64-bit code requested on a subtarget that doesn't support it!
>
> The bug report is fairly limited, but it suggests LLVM looks at the
> family/model/stepping and decides it to be 32-bit, despite qemu64
> reporting it is 64-bit capable. I've not reproduced this myself,
> however, so I'm largely trusting the original reporter's diagnosis
>
> Of course interpreting the family/model/stepping only makes sense
> with scoped to the reported vendor ID. Under TCG, the vendor is
> honoured, but AFAICT, under KVM the vendor defined by the QEMU
> model model is ignored and the real host vendor passed through.
> This will make the chosen family/model/stepping non-sensical when
> run under KVM on an Intel host.
>
> None the less these patches change to report a CPUID with the
> family, model and stepping taken from a
>
> AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4000+
>
> which is one of the first 64-bit AMD CPUs. This is at least more
> accurate in terms of the static CPU model definition, even if it
> is still nonsense in the case where KVM overrides the vendor to
> be non-AMD.
>
> Daniel P. Berrangé (2):
> i386: use better matching family/model/stepping for 'qemu64' CPU
> i386: use better matching family/model/stepping for 'max' CPU
>
> hw/i386/pc.c | 6 +++++-
> target/i386/cpu.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-26 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-07 13:36 [PATCH 0/2] i386: use better matching family/model/stepping for generic CPUs Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-05-07 13:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] i386: use better matching family/model/stepping for 'qemu64' CPU Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-05-26 19:31 ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-05-07 13:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] i386: use better matching family/model/stepping for 'max' CPU Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-05-26 19:34 ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-05-26 16:43 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2021-05-26 19:38 ` [PATCH 0/2] i386: use better matching family/model/stepping for generic CPUs Eduardo Habkost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YK56rnSly772QAxl@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).